Roman Catholic priest, member of Society of Saint-Sulpice and a prominent biblical scholar, esteemed by not only his colleagues of the same confession. One of the first Roman Catholic scholars to apply historical-critical analysis to the Bible.
Brown never tells you his conclusion without first extensively weighing every possible interpretive option. For the deep reader, that's good. For the weekly preacher, challenging. Once you learn how to sift Brown, his insights are helpful. His conclusions often rest on assumptions many classically orthodox Christians will struggle with but his close work on the text remains helpful.
Raymond Brown does in the AYB commentary what every good commentary should do. He names his interpretive framework while simultaneously dealing with introductory matter. He takes the text as we receive it, only offering emendations or comments about redaction in clearly marked parenthetical comments. And he asks the difficult and minute questions often glossed over that unearth the unique meaning of the text (not just our assumptions about it).
In my Lenten series on 1, 2, 3 Jn, this volume has been a constant guide.
I feel like commentaries such as this one are indispensable for a Christian. What the early community of faith grasped and lived out is what also we can grasp and live out, like for like. I truly feel indebted to Raymond Brown for making things so clear