Can sinners really be justified before God by faith alone? If so, can they go on to live as they please? Robert Traill suffered persecution, exile and prison for faithfulness to the gospel. He shows here, with rare clarity and grace, that only justification by faith alone, shows sinners the way to a holy God, makes them a holy and obedient people, gives them joyful assurance of acceptance with God.
Robert Traill's work stands the test of time. Though it would seem dated (written in the early-mid 19th century), it still speaks to the polarized views non-reformed Christians have when it comes to the doctrine of justification.
From the Scriptures, he forcefully shows that while the Reformed view of the doctrine of justification is clearly Biblical contra the view that Arminians held (hold), it also does not in the slightest give license to Christians for antinomianism (something for which some Arminians of his time would charge).
Rather, the Reformed view of the doctrine of justification naturally leads to piety lived out in a life filled with love for God and man from the peace of Jesus Christ because of the justification they've experienced and the grace they experience on a daily basis.
This is a surprisingly well written and relevant short book. Robert Traill was a Scot who started his ministry after the Restoration. He was a wanted man in Scotland so exercised his calling in presbyterian churches England. He was a doughty defender of the doctrine of justification by faith as expressed in the Westminster Confession and defended it against errors of his day.
These errors were twofold. Some had republished works of Tobias Crisp, an antinomian whose views suggested that once we were justified we could live as we wanted since God had forgiven us. Others, who were the stronger party, followed Richard Baxter's neonomian views that were were justified by gospel obedience. That party regarded, falsely, the preaching of Traill and others like him as antinomian since justification was based solely upon the free grace of God.
Traill strongly defends the true doctrine from the charge of lawlessness, showing this charge was also raised against Wycliffe and Tyndale, but that holiness was stressed by them and Traill.
The key issues are understanding the nature of the imputed righteousness of Christ, differentiating the direct act of faith which justifies from the reflex act of faith which sees the effect of belief, that faith is not a work but a hand that receives a gift, and that Christ is truly the second Adam.
He follows with the advantages of the true doctrine. It is the delight of the saved, the only way to deal with our sin and it is our only hope in death.
It has disadvantages too. It is spiritual mystery. Working for life natural man understands. Believing for life, he understands not. It is opposed by most of the world (and the visible church), the ignorant, formalists, proud sinners, those zealous in natural religion. Many churches who once held it have declined from it.
Traill goes on to show why the charge of antinomianism is false before briefly expounding the doctrine as found in the Westminster Standards an concludes showing why the doctrine is vitally important.
What are we to believe? Not that we is in Christ, that our sins are pardoned and we are justified; but we are to believe God's record concerning Christ, and this record is that God gives (offers) to us eternal life in his Son Jesus Christ, and that all that with the heart believe this report, and rest their souls on these glad tidings, shall be saved. And that we are to believe that we may be justified.
I have Traill's works in my library and I look forward to reading more of him.
ok, this book was hard. hard bc i wasn't sure which side he was on... hard bc it seemed he was not on the same side as some that he mentions.... but after a long break (and some other books) getting back to it was not only easier, but my head was more after the wonderful comfort and hope that justification affords <3
Absolutely brutal. Although I've thought the things that Traill wrote about concerning Arminians and Antinomians, I would never have the courage to say it. Traill takes them both to task and leaves no prisoners. Biblical front to back and nails in place the Doctrine of Justification.
A look at the importance and truth of the doctrine of Justification by faith alone. While written for its time and addressing many of the issues of that day, it still is a great overview of the doctrine as well as a good encouragement for us today.
Another classic of the Puritan age on the defending the crucial doctrine of the reformation, justification by faith alone. Very faithful to God's Word and a great challenge to read to help minister better to this current church age.
Does the doctrine of justification of faith alone lead to being anti-law? Robert Trail does a great job of demonstrating the right understanding we should have when it comes to this biblical truth.
A nice primer with a few excellent short quotes. Though at times I wished he defined the definitions he was opposing with more precision, as a positive defense of the doctrine, it was quite good.
This little tract at 70 odd pages is easily readable Justification is the heart of the gospel and our belief system falls or stands on our view of justification in many ways. This book, along with Walter Marhsall's gospel mystery of Sanctification, are both good works on tthis subject, and I have read Marshall's book also. Another one highly recommend by Traill is Dr. Owen's wok on justification.
We cannot afford to over look this doctrine, because it is to critical to the whole of our belief system. It's like the house of cards, you pull one down, the rest will fall, and the doctrine of justification really is the centre of the gospel, which is why it was the battle cry that started the protestant reformation.
Contention over the doctrine of justification has been (and remains) a central issue among Christians. A right understanding of it is necessary in order to have assurance of salvation and proper motivation in holy living. Traill tackles this issue with the usual Puritan blend of precision and practicality, addressing concerns against false doctrines and reinforcing the validity of justification by faith in Christ alone. The language is archaic at times but the content is thoroughly relevant.
Short, sweet, sound and to the point. Traill defends the "old Protestant doctrine" of justification against charges of Antinomianism common in his day, as well as distinguishing it from the growing prevalence of Arminianism. He is gracious, passionate, full of Puritan fervor (and I mean that in the most laudable fashion) and he has teeth when it comes to defending the gospel truths he holds dear.
Short work on the Reformed view of justification. Expect the doctrinal devotional flavor that one would expect of Puritan work. The book is largely an attempt to defend against the charge that the Protestant doctrine of justification will lead to antinominalism. This works shows that this is not the necessary implication of Reformed soteriology.