What do you think?
Rate this book


206 pages, Hardcover
First published January 1, 1943
I had an opportunity to fly around the world in the middle of this war, to see and talk to hundreds of people in more than a dozen nations, and to talk intimately with many of the world’s leaders.It is a fascinating glimpse into the time and the man, considered by many as one of the most interesting and promising US Presidential candidates, a Democrat who ran on the Republican ticket, a clear-sighted defender of human rights who argued passionately about freedom, independence, economic advancement and the end of colonialism:
...the world is awake, at last, to the knowledge that the rule of people by other people is not freedom, and not what we must fight to preserve […] For the peoples of the world intend to be free not only for their political satisfaction, but also for their economic satisfaction.Even more interestingly, he includes a chapter against Our imperialisms at home:
...we have practiced within our own boundaries something that amounts to race imperialism. The attitude of the white citizens of this country towards the Negroes has undeniably had some of the unlovely characteristics of an alien, imperialism -a smug racial superiority, a willingness to exploit an unprotected people. We have justified it by telling ourselves that its end is benevolent. And sometimes it has been. But so sometimes have been the ends of imperialism. And the moral atmosphere in which it has existed is identical to that in which men -well-meaning men- talk of the “white man’s burden”But I am getting ahead of myself. The first part of the book is about the trip, Wilkie visited Cairo and El Alamein where he spoke with Montgomery, Tedder, Godfroy -the French admiral in charge of the interned French naval forces in Alexandria, and King Farouk just as the tide on the North African war front was turning; he visited Jerusalem where he met both Zionists and Palestinian arabs, Beirut where he spoke with Charles de Gaulle, Bagdad and Teheran in the Middle East to learn at first-hand about the political intricacies and the pressing needs for public health and public education. He visited and was struck by the young Turkish republic:
But that atmosphere is changing. Today it is becoming increasingly apparent to thoughtful Americans that we cannot fight the forces and ideas of imperialism abroad and maintain any form of imperialism at home.
[…]
When we talk of freedom and opportunity for all nations, the mocking paradoxes in our own society become so clear they can no longer be ignored. If we want to talk about freedom, we must mean freedom for others as well as for ourselves, and we must mean freedom for everyone inside our frontiers as well as outside.
For the Republic of Turkey has in one generation offered a possible prototype for what is happening to all the vast area that used to be the Ottoman Empire,In the Soviet Union he talked to Stalin, in China to Chiang Kai-Shek and, curiously enough in a brief period of truce between the Nationalists and the Communists, with Chou En Lai. He went as close to the front lines as his hosts allowed him, he toured factories and talked to foreign ministers, finance and other ministers, military commanders, factory managers, governors, and, of course, embassy officials, but he also talked to many ordinary people. This eyewitness glimpse into life behind the front lines in China and in the Yakutsk republic of the URSS is just as fascinating in its own way as John Gunther’s Inside Europe in the 1930s or William Shirer’s The Nightmare Years.
The re-creation of the small countries of Europe as political units, yes; their re-creation as economic and military units, no, if we really hope to bring stabilization to western Europe both for its own benefit and for the peace and economic security of the world.His hopes for a better relationship with URSS and his reading of China were not borne out and neither was his optimism about the role of science.