It took me several months to figure out what to write about this book, but I think I know what to say now.
This book does not feature the Holy Spirit, the Third Person of the Holy Trinity. Yes, this book contains accounts of seemingly miraculous things, but just because something is spiritual in origin, that does not mean it is from God.
The first red flag was raised by the pages of endorsements. It read like a rogues gallery of false teachers and wolves in sheeps’ clothing. From Bill Johnson, reviver of heresies for the modern day, to Mike Bickle, expositor of failed Latter Rain ideologies and wannabe cult leader, these are not trustworthy people. Mixed up in them is Eric Metaxas, a writer for whom I held respect, and whom I believe ought to know better.
The second red flag comes from the introduction, which immediately begins with an undescribed supernatural encounter in high school, the content of which is unshared (I know Fish is a prolific podcast guest and creator, so I don’t know if any account across that body is given) which proceeds after a description from childhood where young Fish describes reading about the supernatural acts of God and exclaiming “I want to do that!” before being told by his grandparents those things don’t happen anymore. While I believe Fish is using this to build his apparent thesis statement that God still performs miracles today (a statement with which no Christian should disagree), the manner it is presented also, I believe, presents the foundational problem of this book: It is about power, not about the Gospel. Yes, Jesus is mentioned 146 times in the book and the Holy Spirit 100 times, but as we know from church history “On that day many will say to me, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and cast out demons in your name, and do many mighty works in your name?’ And then will I declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from me, you workers of lawlessness.’” [Matthew 7:22-23]. The focus of this book is as a presentation of power, with the understanding being that you, the reader, could have this power too. The Gospel takes a backseat to this, and as such is lost, so that instead we must hearken to St. Paul’s warning “But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to the one we preached to you, let him be accursed. As we have said before, so now I say again: If anyone is preaching to you a gospel contrary to the one you received, let him be accursed.” [Galatians 1:8-9].
So then what comes of this is that the following miraculous accounts are a bludgeon of “lived experience” that do not correspond to proof that Ken Fish comes to us with a message from Jesus, or that this is proof that the Holy Spirit walks with him [Deuteronomy 13:1-3]. But this is not necessarily a surprising method, given that Fish claims John Wimber as his mentor— who famously espoused experiences as the lead for interpreting God’s Word.
The third flag comes in the “theological” (and I use the adjective loosely) segments before each ream of accounts. In his intro, Fish says he sees these pillars as part of the matrix by which one may do miraculous works. Yet in the reading I failed to understand how his topics connect, much less how anything discussed actually related to the stated topic. The best segment was on purity, and that is because it adhered most to orthodox Christian teaching. Unfortunately it is poisoned by the messenger as Fish still claims the prophecies and miracles of those like the Kansas City Prophets while such men were in active sinful lifestyles during their ministries. The first bad fruit to notice is false teaching, and if that one is ignored, then the bad fruit of an evil way of life will almost always come next. Through all of these, and also the stories which succeed them, the Scriptures are used in what to me seems like post hoc justification. But what can you expect when God’s Word needs to be made to fit what you’ve interpreted your experience to mean?
The stories themselves blend together after a while. What is clear, however, is that if experiences like this truly happened with Fish, he is not interpreting them through a Biblical worldview. He appears to be animistic, what with his mentions of water spirits, spider spirits, and the broader Dominion theology which pervades any discussion of casting out evil spirits. Though, it should be noted, I believe a great deal of this is just misinterpreting nervousness and inducing vomiting given his starting account of casting 600 devils out of a poor kid who read manga. How you host 600 demons and not go even slightly mad as the Garosene demoniac of the Gospels I can’t fathom. Generally, Fish pushes the false teaching that demons can indwell a believer who is baptized, but I attribute this to his belief in the unbiblical teaching that there is a separate “baptism of the holy spirit” (which if you pay money and go to his conferences, you can learn how to access this power, I’m sure).
Ultimately, this book is targeting three groups of people. The first group are the true believers who will uncritically read this and accept it despite the contradictions with the Bible because it’s exactly what they’ve heard all of their lives. The second are the emotionally vulnerable who have experienced tragedy and are looking for something that will ultimately grant them control over illness or whatever ails them. The third are those who grew up in a church that either failed to catechize them in the traditional orthodox understandings of spirituality or grew up in a tradition that had vacated the spiritual Christian perspective. These know there is more to the world and the role of the Holy Spirit than they were taught, but are ignorant of how the church has taught these things. They hear charismatics claim that “holy laughter” or being “slain in the spirit” and “speaking in tongues” are how the Holy Spirit manifests himself and is ultimately powerless to refute these due to that gap in knowledge.
All three groups are ultimately victims of deception, because it is framed for them thusly: “If you deny that these things are real, then you are just a cessationist who is dead in your faith and you have a small view of God.” The reality is that Ken Fish and those in his circles continue the revival of the Montanist heresy in America. Montanus was an early 2nd century man who was formerly a priest of Apollo who, after his conversion, claimed the Holy Spirit gave him direct revelation concerning the end of days with an exact date and location for Jesus’ return. According to Eusebius, he did not prophesy in the manner of the orthodox Christians. St. Irenaeus confronts the Montanists of his time in Against Heresies, specifically in the person of Marcus the Magician. A distinction is drawn between these “prophecies” and “signs” and the true gifts of the Holy Spirit seen in his congregation at Lyons.
This is not a book which proclaims the Gospel. Rather it is a Trojan horse for heresy and occult practices for the church (ironic given Fish’s insistence that Christians avoid syncretistic practices). But Christians were warned about this. “For then there will be great tribulation, such as has not been from the beginning of the world until now, no, and never will be. And if those days had not been cut short, no human being would be saved. But for the sake of the elect those days will be cut short. Then if anyone says to you, ‘Look, here is the Christ!’ or ‘There he is!’ do not believe it. For false christs and false prophets will arise and perform great signs and wonders, so as to lead astray, if possible, even the elect.” [Matthew 24:21-24]