Well, it's a book. It gives some knowledge… not much I don't actually know… but it is still knowledge, kinda. It is simply written. Mayhap it was written without me in mind? Maybe the insolent book did not deign to target me as its veritable audience. This is utter bosh, I'm sure, yet there is still that prevailing suspicion. Anyway, it lies some. Terrible, gross, malignant renderings of distorted truth. And worse—IT GIVES YOU NO EVIDENCE FOR ANYTHING IT SAYS. It spouts out a falsehood and instead of giving something empirical or even just plain old logical, it just moves on to the next thing. Despicable, I say, despicable. IT DOESN'T EVEN GIVE YOU A CHART OF GOOD OLD DATA. Nor does it give out a nice discourse. So, it's not very scientific. And it had the audacity to have "how" and "why" in its subtitle. Bah. Books these days. (No offense to the author; since the erring beliefs are commonly held, it makes "sense" to put them into a book along with no evidence. Problems arise, however, because, if this book is going to have scientific theories and hypotheses in it, it ought to be scientific about it and not simply state them like fact.)