Robert Christgau, usually referred to nowadays as the "Dean of American Rock Critics" (or music journalists, or whatever) is, in fact, a legend of music journalism. The essays collected in this book were written over the course of nearly three decades, though they were updated, edited and otherwise "tweaked" as the author felt necessary during the preparation of the book. I have not ever been a regular reader of his work, even when I was myself a young music journalist during the early 1990s- I don't think I'd ever seen a copy of the 'Village Voice' in those days. Notwithstanding that fact, though, even I have been aware for many years that Mr. Christgau enjoyed a very good reputation as a writer, and had been one of those individuals who first established the accepted form of coverage for popular music after the advent and rise of rock'n'roll. In terms of style, technique and erudition there was nothing in this book which would tend to belie that reputation. That does not mean, however, that I agreed with everything he wrote here.
While my own tastes in music are not dissimilar, particularly in terms of breadth and scope, I found that in many cases this apparent basic commonality began to unravel, and to reveal quite serious differences of opinion as the focus was tightened down to one band, musician or recording. Obviously, there is nothing wrong with that- it is only to be expected. Unlike Mr. Christgau, I was never successful enough as a journalist to make my living at it. In addition, he is nearly thirty years my senior, which obviously has an effect on taste, perspective etc. However, during my own life I have played, studied, thought about and written about music more than enough to be every bit as sure of my views as is Mr. Christgau of his. Most of those differences of opinion (one of them can be seen in the note that I posted while roughly half-way through the book*) can probably be ascribed to the fact that I am a musician who briefly dabbled in music journalism, while Mr. Christgau is a professional music critic. Of course, I agreed with what he wrote in many cases as well, and either way these essays made interesting reading. Frequently exhausting, but interesting. I'm not used to having to work so hard while reading about music, which is probably why it took so long for me to finish this book...
During my extremely short (roughly six years) career in music journalism, one thing that invariably provided a great deal of amusement for not only myself but also various colleagues was the frequently hilarious over-the-top compulsion of many if not most music writers to show off their (sometimes quite impressive) vocabularies and levels of erudition, no matter how short the piece they were writing. I was at least as guilty as most others in that regard, but I suspect that Robert Christgau may be the all-time champion...
*[On p. 193, Christgau states that rock'n'roll (or possibly punk rock; he's talking about the New York Dolls, so it isn't entirely clear) "was supposed to be a definitively white style"(!). Say fucking what? That's got to be one of the stupidest things ever written by someone who should damned well know better...]