Was heißt es, eine Frau oder ein Mann, schwarz oder weiß zu sein? Hierauf geben feministische und antirassistische Theorien scheinbar widerstreitende Antworten: Während die einen diese Kategorien als sozial konstruiert begreifen, sofern unter sie zu fallen bedeutet, in bestimmten sozialen Beziehungen der Unterordnung zu stehen, denken andere sie als objektiv, sofern unter sie zu fallen für Menschen reale Konsequenzen zeitigt, denen sie sich schwer entziehen können. In dieser Sammlung bahnbrechender Aufsätze entwickelt die Philosophin Sally Haslanger eine sozialkonstruktionistische Theorie sozialer Arten, die diesen beiden Erfordernissen gleichermaßen Rechnung trägt.
finally finished this. it's too long by half. very repetitive: the papers should be read individually, the book should not be read as a book. the length allows haslanger to cover over every subject it possesses in billowy good sense, persistently and unobtrusively. this makes it hard to endorse or critique. i was mainly interested because it contains some of the loci classici of conceptual engineering, so this material was my favourite. it is less revisionary as some of the lore about it has suggested: it treats ameliorative definitions as basically for the most part descriptively accurate. this renders the amelioration far more plausible, though it leaves the social constructionist proposals open to empirical critique, as for instance about folk race concepts (or conceptions, or whatever). i also quite liked the supremely personal section on interracial adoption, somehow. there's a persisting tone of sobriety and openness combined with a slightly embarrassing, sort of teacherly wokeness which i associate with analytic feminist philosophy. this has it in buckets; it's quite comforting after a while, really
This book thoroughly unpacks an overused concept, social construction, especially as it pertains to gender and race. I would say it is a necessary read if you want to be confident in your use of the term in an academic context. It is, however, a collection of separately published papers on similar themes. So if you read it front to back like I did, you might find it repetitive at times.