What do you think?
Rate this book


504 pages, Hardcover
First published November 30, 1989
In my review of the previous volume in Christopher Tolkien's History Of Middle-Earth, I said that it was a quicker, easier read than some of the earlier books in the series. One of the main reasons for this is that the four books that make up The History of the Lord of the Rings--the series-within-a-series--lead to an actual published endpoint. There is a final, definitive Lord of the Rings, and so it's enjoyable to see the early ideas and drafts heading toward the familiar story.
The second volume of The History of the Lord of the Rings, The Treason of Isengard, is, however, a slightly more tedious read than The Return of the Shadow. One reason is that the first 189 pages are rewrites of material that was covered in The Return of the Shadow. The developments and changes are more slight--as of course they must be when it's existing material being revised, rather than new writing coming out of nothing. But once the drafts push on beyond the end of The Fellowship of the Ring, it is remarkable how quickly many of the major elements in the final story fall into place. I was especially interested to learn in what order Tolkien wrote the story once the Fellowship breaks apart.
Throughout the drafting of what would become The Two Towers, as well as some parts of The Return of the King, the names continue to evolve, though most are well set by this point in the writing. Details are reimagined or reconfigured. And some major elements--such as Arwen--are yet to be devised. It was Tolkien's perspective that he was recording history "as it actually happened," and many times he saw many things fully formed in the initial drafts.
Christopher Tolkien is highly intrigued by a couple of areas that don't engage my interest very much, and both areas appear repeatedly in The Treason of Isengard. The first is an interest in the minute details of timing and chronology. Christopher spends a great deal of endnote discussion time figuring out the precise details of which days the events took place. I just don't really care about those details. The other area that Christopher often writes about in the History series is geography. It wasn't a big part of The Return of the Shadow, but in The Treason of Isengard there is an entire chapter on the early maps of Middle-Earth; and though I am interested in Middle-Earth maps, I found myself skimming this chapter and not gleaning much from it.
None of this is a problem with the book; just a difference in what fascinates me. The book continues to be an amazing tour of the creation of The Lord of the Rings, and I look forward to getting into the next volume.
My reviews of the other volumes in The History of the Lord of the Rings series:
χρόνος ανάγνωσης κριτικής: 25 δευτερόλεπτα
Όπως και με τον προηγούμενο τόμο έτσι και αυτός ι έχει να κάνει με την
Τρίτη Εποχή και πιο συγκεκριμένα την ιστορία του
Άρχοντα των Δαχτυλιδιών, το αγαπημένο μου βιβλίο.
Αφηγείται τη διαδικασία δημιουργίας του, από τις πρώτες ιδέες μέχρι τα
τελευταία προσχέδια.
Η διαφορά με το προηγούμενο είναι ότι άρχισαν πλέον να
αυξάνονται οι επαναλήψεις
και οι συχνές διακοπές της αφήγησης
από τον Κρίστοφερ για να κάνει σχολιασμό.
Και η αλήθεια είναι ότι άρχισα κάπως να βαριέμαι αυτή την εξονυχιστική
ανάλυση για το πόσες διακλαδώσεις έχει ο τάδε ποταμός, τη μέρα έπεφτε
πανσέληνος, και πόσες γενιές διαφορά έχει ο ένας βασιλιάς από τον άλλο
στο πρώτο και στο δεύτερο προσχέδιο.