If There Be Thorns gives us a peek into the life of Malcolm, the haunting figure who's omnipresent throughout the Dollanganger books but only seen once, and then from afar. Bart Jr. reads Malcolm's old diary and through that, we learn about Malcolm's womanizing ways, and a bit more of the family history.
Why the existence of this book, then, after all has been said and done already? The purpose is to experience through Olivia's eyes all that's happened from her marriage to the night she first locks the door behind which conceals those four doomed children. This book opens with a forenote from Olivia's will, bidding us to "judge her if we dare" once we learn the full story, which implies that her re-telling is supposed to engender pity for whom we've come to know as "the evil grandmother".
Yes, at the core, Olivia's circumstances were pitiable. It seems her hard looks--something she couldn't change no matter how much she tried--led her into her dark fate. She's not considered marriageable because of them, and it's assumed she'll be a spinster for the rest of her life (need I say that in those days, a woman was considered a failure unless she could secure a marriage?) until Malcolm comes along. She can't believe the miracle of a handsome, charming, and wealthy man being interested in someone like her...and she shouldn't have believed it. Malcolm basically hired her for the job of being a wife, rather than marry her because he loved her. The first time he meets her is more like a job interview, in his eyes, and Malcolm treats her like he does any servant in his house because like the servants, Olivia has duties he expects her to complete: keep the house in order and give him children. He never gives her tenderness. The only times they share a bed together are when he rapes her for hope of impregnating her, and when the doctor says it'd be dangerous for Olivia to have any more children, Malcolm takes it out on her as if it was her choice to be unable to give birth anymore.
It's not hard to imagine a woman treated so terribly would turn coldhearted. But what she went through does NOT excuse her cruel actions...it just serves to make us understand how she became that way.
The book starts with what came to be the usual V.C. Andrews cliche talk about rose-colored hopes and dollhouse dreams. I guess Olivia had to be depicted as a hopeful girl just like any other, because that makes Malcolm's deception all the more unforgiveable, but showing Olivia to be this way at the beginning made me skeptical. The grandmother's severity in the first book was such that I assumed Olivia would have to have had some cruel tendencies earlier on in her life, but that wasn't so. Making this character, so full of dreams and wishes for love at the beginning, turn malicious by the end...I had to wonder if the author would be able to carry out that transformation believably.
There was one moment in the book where Olivia does something cruel, but it seemed inconsistent with her behavior before. Olivia was motivated by jealousy but there was nothing beforehand to insinuate that Olivia was capable of such cruelty, especially after just admitting that the person she was jealous of also happened to inspire happy feelings in Olivia at the same time. And besides that one random moment, there's no other instance of cruelty in Olivia. In fact, even right to the last page of the book, Olivia says she feels love in her heart for Corinne and even Corinne's grandchildren! This doesn't mesh well with the idea perpetuated that Olivia only loved her sons, and disliked Corinne. In the first book, Corinne even implies to the children that Olivia never was capable of loving Corinne, but in this book, Olivia is very doting on Corinne. None of it adds up, despite the author using religious fervor as the only motivator for Olivia's cruelty (John Amos having brainwashed Olivia into believing it's her religious duty to punish the grandchildren for having been born out of incest).
Garden of Shadows also has the disadvantage of being a story we already know at its foundation...mostly. For example, when Malcolm's new stepmother arrives with his father at the house, we already know what's going to happen because he talks about it in the diary from the third book. Readers might get bored at times like that. But~ there's a whole new twist added to the family history that we never knew about, and it makes the whole Foxworth saga all the more disturbing. Let's just say Christopher and Cathy had more in common with their parents than we even imagined. (Although I see from the first review on this book's page that someone delighted in spoiling that surprise so by the time anyone's gotten to THIS review, she or he may already have that ruined for them. Sigh, regardless...)
I'm not sure at this point whether V.C. Andrews herself wrote most of this, or none of this, and it doesn't really matter. Even the third book in the series already seemed exactly like those of the ghostwriter's in style, and I know V.C. Andrews would've written the whole of that book, so. Characterization isn't good and cliches abound so I was pretty bored with this one.
There's one aspect to the book that I do find interesting. Beneath the trashy surface, there's a lot to be observed in the human character. Malcolm was abandoned by his mother when he was a child, which is what lead to him having such a distorted view on women in the future. It's an example of just how deeply our parents affect us, how someone who's not ready for that responsibility can really ruin a child. His own mother left him, so Malcolm had no reason to assume other women wouldn't hurt him in the future. He develops an Oedipus complex, and uses women for sex as a form of revenge and as a way to make sure they're under his control so he can't be hurt again. Ironically, the type of women he proclaims to hate are the ones he actually cares about, but they all end up hurting him, too, as if in divine punishment for his treatment of other women. Even though he is the one who seeks to control women, in actuality the women have power over him, because he's so consumed with his love/hate for the female gender that it's taken over his entire being. It also shows a conflict over what is "right" and how religion can be distorted into something the opposite of what it stands for. Olivia and John Amos wanted to play God themselves, handing out redemption for what they saw as wrong, but it's up to God to do that as He sees fit. So while they thought they were being pious, they were true sinners.
That's what keeps me going back to the V.C. Andrews books. They don't shy away from those aspects to human character that we all try to cover up. There's thousands of books about terrible killings and monsters, but barely few that showcase the kind of secrets that V.C. Andrews books do, even though the latter are more prevalent than we can probably guess. Show all the murders you can come up with and we can handle that no problem, but we'll collectively balk at certain topics like those that come up in V.C.A. books. That shows what's more disturbing to the public at large...