I really like the idea of the book- a theme of individuality and accepting your personal differences and learning to love yourself but the way the book came off left me disappointed. First, I don't quite get where the name Eula is coming from (end user license agreement?), especially as the other two cats have mundane names- Patsy and Maude. The best line in the book is certainly the one about mouse holes- "they are impossible for all cats, round or square," although I can't really figure out why "round" is in red text and "square" is in green. The whole text colouring thing doesn't really make sense throughout the book- maybe the book designer was trying to make a boring book more interesting? My biggest concern is with the lack of expression the illustrator achieves on the faces of the cats. Patsy and Maude especially seem to always have the exact same expression and because its shared between two characters they consequentially have no personality. I do like the outside shape of the cats, especially on Eula the square cat, who has been drafted with a straightedge and triangle rather than drawn. this can be seen in the way the corners sometimes over lap and sometimes don't meet. This is technically sloppy drafting, but in a children's book I like allowing some freedom, as the messiness adds whimsy. The watercolor infill is also working for me, as it doesn't quite come up to the line of the outside shape, emphasizing the outside line. On the other hand, the composition is pretty boring- the figure(s) of one to three cats are always plopped in the middle of a white page. I also strongly object to the many symmetrical two page spreads- they're boring and static and don't make sense in a picture book where the reader is moving left to right across the page rather than staring at a single composition. So, over all, the idea is nice, the narrative could be reworked a little to flow better and be alright, and the illustrations should be discarded and done over from scratch.