What do you think?
Rate this book
عشرة أيام في السودان
يقول محمد حسين هيكل في مقدمة الكتاب:
ليس في هذا الكتاب شيء أكثر من مما يمكن أن يشتمله عنوانه، فهو مجموعة ملاحظات ومعلومات جمعتها أثناء رحلتنا القصيرة بالسودان
وهي قصيرة حقًا لأناه لم تتجاوز عشرة أيام، وعشرة أيام أمد قصير لا يستطيع الإنسان فيه أن يلم إلماما صحيحًا بكل ما يقع تحت نظره، كما لا يتسطيع تحقيق كل ما يصل إلى مسامعه، كلنها مع ذلك تمسح بالوقوف على كثير مما لم يكن للإنسان به علم، كما تسمح بتحقيق كثير مما كان الإنسان يتخيله تخيلا
ليس في هذا الكتاب شيء أكثر من مما يمكن أن يشتمله عنوانه، فهو مجموعة ملاحظات ومعلومات جمعتها أثناء رحلتنا القصيرة بالسودان
وهي قصيرة حقًا لأناه لم تتجاوز عشرة أيام، وعشرة أيام أمد قصير لا يستطيع الإنسان فيه أن يلم إلماما صحيحًا بكل ما يقع تحت نظره، كما لا يتسطيع تحقيق كل ما يصل إلى مسامعه، كلنها مع ذلك تمسح بالوقوف على كثير مما لم يكن للإنسان به علم، كما تسمح بتحقيق كثير مما كان الإنسان يتخيله تخيلا
137 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1927
4 people are currently reading
85 people want to read
About the author
Mohammed Hussein Heikal
46 books6 followersMohammed Hussein Heikal (Arabic: محمد حسين هيكل) was an Egyptian writer, journalist, politician. He held several cabinet posts, including minister of education.
Many critics have considered the novel Zeinab, written by Heikal 1913, as the 'first modern Egyptian novel. However, some scholars have debated this, with Elliot Colla reaching a conclusion that this label had more to do with "the needs of national institutions such as the cinema, the Parliament, or Cairo University, at moments of formation or reformation than it does with the texts themselves." Colla went on to conclude that Zaynab became recognized as part of the national literary tradition not at the moment of its initial production but in subsequent circumstances of reception and reproduction tied to other non-literary significances.
Many critics have considered the novel Zeinab, written by Heikal 1913, as the 'first modern Egyptian novel. However, some scholars have debated this, with Elliot Colla reaching a conclusion that this label had more to do with "the needs of national institutions such as the cinema, the Parliament, or Cairo University, at moments of formation or reformation than it does with the texts themselves." Colla went on to conclude that Zaynab became recognized as part of the national literary tradition not at the moment of its initial production but in subsequent circumstances of reception and reproduction tied to other non-literary significances.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
No one has reviewed this book yet.