Since its first publication in 1965, this edition has been widely hailed as the best available text of Blake's poetry and prose. Now revised, it includes up-to-date work on variants, chronology of the poems, and critical commentary by Harold Bloom. An "Approved Edition" of the Center for Scholarly Editions of the Modern Language Association.
William Blake was an English poet, painter, and printmaker. Largely unrecognised during his lifetime, Blake's work is today considered seminal and significant in the history of both poetry and the visual arts.
Blake's prophetic poetry has been said to form "what is in proportion to its merits the least read body of poetry in the language". His visual artistry has led one modern critic to proclaim him "far and away the greatest artist Britain has ever produced." Although he only once travelled any further than a day's walk outside London over the course of his life, his creative vision engendered a diverse and symbolically rich corpus, which embraced 'imagination' as "the body of God", or "Human existence itself".
Once considered mad for his idiosyncratic views, Blake is highly regarded today for his expressiveness and creativity, and the philosophical and mystical currents that underlie his work. His work has been characterized as part of the Romantic movement, or even "Pre-Romantic", for its largely having appeared in the 18th century. Reverent of the Bible but hostile to the established Church, Blake was influenced by the ideals and ambitions of the French and American revolutions, as well as by such thinkers as Emanuel Swedenborg.
Despite these known influences, the originality and singularity of Blake's work make it difficult to classify. One 19th century scholar characterised Blake as a "glorious luminary", "a man not forestalled by predecessors, nor to be classed with contemporaries, nor to be replaced by known or readily surmisable successors."
William Blake is one of the greatest poets of the English language. I'd recommend this book to anyone interested in the mysteries of life. A great concept that William Blake shared was how the individual ought to draw his or hers own conclusions and find their personalized ways, otherwise, they'll become a slave to someone else's thoughts the rest of their lives. Very well worth the read. Furthermore, anyone who's interested in republicanism and democracy should put this great book on their shelf. I thoroughly enjoyed both the poetry and prose in it. Highly recommended.
Ladies and gentlemen, make way for the BLOWOUT! scholarly edition of the man who kept me focused on the inherently fated and apocalyptic nature of modern life for a few weeks. I've been a fan ever since high school, and felt the need to clean house and read the complete works, including the really boring, ephemeral letters. With this, you get a complete picture of Blake's worldview, and the bizarre mythological systems he dreamt up to convey his vision of life in England around the turn of the 19th Century, dark Satanic mills and all.
How is it possible that Blake was able to articulate the full enormity of his vision while keeping up with the complex mythological narrative he invented? Through much of his longer poetical works he so effortlessly associates his mammoth cosmic figures with a riveting and impassioned philosophical discourse. One wonders whether the man was even human. And yet it is precisely this disbelief he and, a bit later and with more severity, Nietzsche preached against.
For Blake, the human imagination is the gateway to eternity, and anyone is capable of it. Yet even this vote of confidence in man falls short of Nietzsche's often misunderstood optimism when he asserts that artistic achievement has nothing to do with the "muse" and is wholly within the boundaries of human ability. For Nietzsche, man alone responsible for his great works, and to credit anything else with their sublimity is to undermine human potential. But Blake, a man of profound faith, contends that "When I am commanded by the spirits, then I write; and the moment I have written, I see the words fly about the room in all directions." Yet how telling it is that even this humble explaining-away of his powers is fraught with poetry.
But whether or not Blake credited himself with his evident genius, the works speak for themselves. And for "The Complete Poetry and Prose," two of the most competent Blake scholars join forces to offer a clear, extensive and informed presentation of Blake's output. Astonishing in scope and scholarship, this Erdman/Bloom edition is as indispensable for Blake's work as it is for their notes and commentary. My only complaint is the inconsistency of Bloom's commentary. He skips entire sections of Blake's worth here, whereas he covers every last word of it in his own book, "Blake's Apocalypse." Hmm . . . Harold wouldn't, by any chance, be trying to get us to, um, SPEND a little more, you think? Naaahhh.
But no commentary -- no matter how illuminating -- will ever approach the radiance of Blake's own words. From the plainspoken awe of the early masterpieces, "Ahania" and "The Book of Thel," to the astonishing epics "The Four Zoas" and "Jerusalem" and right down to "The Mental Traveler," that late fruition of Blake's bitingly ironical voice, "The Complete Poems and Prose" reads like a Bible in its own right. Routinely taking on such lofty subjects as the fall of man, love and jealousy, desire and reason, good and evil, a reading of Blake's work all together yields just as much beauty, mystery and genius.
Equally as riveting are the many letters with which the primary portion of the book concludes. Rife with the fierce inquisitiveness and confidence that characterizes the famous "Proverbs of Hell," Blake's letters rank with those of Keats and Hopkins as some of the most stirring autobiographical sketches ever produced by a master poet.
Erdman's "Prophet Against Empire" and Bloom's aforementioned "Blake's Apocalypse" make for great companion pieces, as does Frye's "Fearful Symmetry." But I think the best way for new readers to take on Blake's work is by diving blindly into its initially cold waters, and only calling in Erdman, Bloom and Frye to turn up the heat later on.
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
While frequently described as "pre-Romantic," Blake wrote on many themes typically associated with Romanticism, including nature, imagination and the experiences of childhood. One significant way in which Blake differs from the Romantic poets, however, is in his use of myth. While poets like Keats or Shelley might make reference to a recognized character from classical myth (even basing a longer work on such a character, as in the case of Shelley's verse drama Prometheus Unbound), Blake's mythical references are to such obscure beings as Urizen, Luvah and Tharmas, and to mysterious entities such as spectres and emanations. These characters are not from any earlier mythic tradition, but were invented by Blake in his major “prophetic” works, including The Four Zoas, Milton and Jerusalem. In the context of his constructing an original mythology, I think my favorite quote by Blake has to be "I must Create a System or be enslav'd by another Mans; I will not Reason & Compare: my business is to Create." As a mythopoeic artist, if Blake is to be compared to anyone, perhaps it should be to writers like J.R. Tolkien or H P Lovecraft.
(For me, Blake's major prophetic works rank up there along with Finnegans Wake with regard to the amount of intellectual effort one must make in order to make sense of what is going on at any point in the work. I have found Northrop Frye’s Fearful Symmetry: A Study of William Blake useful in its commentary on the general outlines of Blake's mythological system).
Other works like An Island in the Moon and The Marriage of Heaven and Hell do not require familiarity with Blake's mythology. For its paradoxicality, and particularly for its "Proverbs of Hell," which reminds me other aphoristic writers like Friedrich Nietzsche and Heraclitus, The Marriage is a particular favorite of mine.
William Blake became one of the most highly regarded writers and painters during his time--after his death. He was opinionated and luckily he was afforded the opportunity to express views that others were persecuted for expressing during that time in history. To fully understand his work, study his life and the societal norms of the day. Otherwise you can't fully appreciate the beauty of his ideas.
Blake was a printer and published his own poems—many illustrated. In fact scholars debate which pantheon to place him: artist or poet. Because of the labor intensive and time consuming manner in which type was set my hand, Blake’s poetry is extremely economic. It is this conservation of words expressing such an abundance of ideas that makes his writing profoundly simple. That combined with the fact he had visions and was probably insane makes for great poetry.
"Hear the voice of the Bard! Who Present, Past, & Future sees Whose ears have heard The Holy Word, That walk’d among the ancient trees.
Calling the lapsed Soul And weeping in the evening dew; That might controll. The starry pole; And fallen fallen light renew!
O Earth O Earth return! Arise from out the dewy grass; Night is worn, And the morn Rises from the slumbrous mass.
Turn away no more: Why wilt thou turn away The starry floor The watery shore Is given thee till the break of day."
Blake has very varied expressions based on what he wished to achieve, though the language itself usually stays simple and lyrical on the surface. If we ignore his rhyming, the language also resembles the language of religious works. Not exactly surprising considering many of his works are very religious and spiritual. On the superficial level, many of his poems seem like simple praises and descriptions but with analysis, they reveal many different levels of interpretation. He also used many different techniques during his career ranging from free form with no rhymes to poems resembling children's rhymes to metrical quatrains. He also uses symbolism and allusions. Much of his subjects revolve around the human condition. Our vices and virtues. It's wonderful to see all of this in one book.
Erdman's edition of the complete poetry and prose is now the standard edition of Blake's complete works and is the edition referenced by the Blake concordance online (as well as being available online, but Bloom's commentary is not). It is superior editorially to Keynes's edition, but the organization of Keynes's edition always made more sense to me, being more strictly chronological. Furthermore, the Erdman edition heavily edits The Four Zoas to make it a coherent text, so I recommend direct study of the manuscript of FZ to those serious about it, making reference to Erdman's version of FZ as one reading of the poem rather than the poem itself.
I borrowed The Complete Poetry & Prose of William Blake through the Arrowhead interlibrary loan system, which serves northeast Minnesota. I must return it by Feb 4, 2013. Literally, it is a very heavy book in paperback. You could prop up an end of a bookshelf with it, or use it as a doorstop.
I like it so much, I may buy a copy. I knew Blake composed beautiful work. I knew little about how radical he was for his time. He created most of his work during the period from 1784 until his death in 1827. He challenges whatever you believe, whether traditional Christian or Humanist, and often writes his own opposing opinions back-to-back. He challenged the translations of Greek and Roman mythology, from Chaucer, Marlowe, and Milton. He has little good to say about the Church of England, or Rome. I thought he was a follower of Swedenborg, but he is an antagonist, and rewrites the doctrines.
The Commentary by Harold Bloom, 80 pages of it at the back of the book, is an interesting companion to the text. You do not have to read the book in sequence. At least read "The Visions of the Daughters of Albion" (the hymn to free love), and "The Book of Urizen", a creation story that never ends.
"Tell me what is day or night to one o'erflowd with woe? Tell me what is a thought? & of what substance is it made? Tell me what is joy? & in what garden do joys grow? And in what river swim the sorrows? and upon what mountains Wave shadows of discontent? and in what houses dwell the wretched Drunken with woe forgotten, and shut up from cold despair.
Tell me where dwell the thoughts forgotten till thou call them forth Tell me where dwell the joys of old! & where the ancient loves? And when will they renew again & the night of oblivion past? ..." pp. 47-8
"I cry, Love! Love! Love! happy happy Love! free as the mountain wind!" p. 50
the apocalypse, from The Four Zoas: Night the Ninth:
"... rivn link from link the bursting Universe explodes "All things reversed flew from their centers rattling bones "To bones Join, shaking convulsd the shivering clay breathes "Each speck of dust to the Earths center nestles round & round "In pangs of an Eternal Birth in torment & awe & fear "All spirits deceasd let loose from reptile prisons come in shoals "Wild furies from the tygers brain & from the lions Eyes "And from the ox & ass come moping terrors. from the Eagle "And raven numerous as the leaves of Autumn every species "Flock to the trumpet muttring over the sides of the grave & crying "In the fierce wind round heaving rocks & mountains filld with groans "On rifted rocks suspended in the air by inward fires "Many a woful company & many on clouds & waters "Fathers & friends Mothers & Infants Kings & Warriors "Priests & chaind Captives met together in a horrible fear "And every one of the dead appears as he had livd before "And all the marks remain of the Slaves scourge & tyrants Crown "And of the Priests oergorged Abdomen & of the merchants thin "Sinewy deception & of the warriors outbraving and thoughtlessness "In lineaments too extended & in bones too strait & long "They shew their wounds they accuse they sieze the opressor howlings began ".... "One Planet calls to another & one star enquires of another "What flames are these coming from the South what noise what dreadful rout "As of a battle in the heavens hark heard you not the trumpet "As of fierce battle while they spoke the flames come on intense roaring"
“The Marriage of Heaven and Hell” […] If the doors of perception were cleansed, every thing would appear to man as it is: infinite. For man has closed himself up, till he sees all things thro' narrow chinks of his cavern.
[autograph:] William Blake: one who is very much delighted with being in good company. Born 28 Nov 1757 in London & has died several times since.
“Auguries of Innocence” […] Every Night & every Morn Some to Misery are Born Every Morn & every Night Some are Born to sweet delight Some are Born to sweet delight Some are Born to Endless Night
[Letter to Mr. Butts, Felpham, August 16, 1803] O, why was I born with a different face? Why was I not born like the rest of my race? When I look, each one starts; when I speak, I offend; Then I'm silent & pensive, & I lose every Friend.
Then my verse I dishonour, My pictures despise; My person degrade, & my temper chastise; And the pen is my terror, the pencil my shame; All my talents I bury, and dead is my Fame.
I am either too low, or too highly priz'd; When Elate I'm Envy'd, When Meek I'm despis'd.
I am sympathetic to Blake’s attacks on organized religion and moralism, but not his attempts to tar enlightenment reason with the same brush. I share his respect for the imagination, but not his mysticism.
N.B. If you are a Blake novice (as I was), I do not recommend the Erdman edition. The poems are out of chronological order and it lacks an introduction. Bloom’s commentary is excellent but assumes prior knowledge of Blake’s mythology and symbolic language.
For many of the longer works, I didn't necessarily love the "story" that Blake was telling, but his use of language is just so good that it virtually always outweighed that. If you like seeing what creative and talented people can do with the English language, this is definitely something to read.
Also, this book is incredibly thorough, so there are incomplete works here and inclusions like the marginalia may not be of interest to all but the most hard-core Blake fans.
Blake was one of the first poets I ever read and have come across time and time again and is also one of the only poets I've ever studied whose works I've thoroughly enjoyed reading. Thought provoking and full of interesting discourses - a sobering but refreshing step back from the typical 18th Century Gothic or Austen novel.
I absolutely adore William Blake. I am completely against any edition that has the poems without the illustrations (dunno about that one, picked it at random). It's literally a crime against the man's art to publish the text without the drawings.
The metaphors and personifcation William Blake uses throughout his poetry were enjoyable to read. I liked how even though he was a poet from the Romantic Period his verse wasn't as strict about keeping to the exact meter which paved the way for free verse poets.
I will never finish this book. I will never part from this book. I have lots of books like that. Flip to a page and start reading. Eternal wisdom in her, and the eternal child. Lots of stuff I haven’t read also. I find him exceptionally difficult to read once he continues a poem for more than a few pages.
Well, I did it. Sort of. I skimmed a lot of the letters but it still counts. What a read. What a mind. What a lot of inspiration. The man sure had some opinions on Art and Life. The world-building is second to none.
oh my, this shit rocks. shakespeare dethroned and now the inferior william of english lit. songs of innocence and experience been rocking my world since 2019
Difficult to digest but a wonderful experience, I suspect when I re-read this one in 3-5 years I'm gonna have a different interpretation of Blake's works.
Periodically flipping through the shorter verse of "Songs of Innocence and of Experience" and the longer poems or visions, especially the Marriage of Heaven and Hell, is a thrilling experience. Blake is a deceptively simple poet. It is not hard to decipher the literal meaning in a number of his shorter lyrics like "The Sick Rose" or "A Poison Tree," but with these shorter works there always seems to lurk something deeper and infinitely more frightening. That feeling of something radical is only compounded in the "visions" like America and the Marriage of Heaven and Hell. An off-hand answer from me regarding who is my favorite Romantic poet will probably always be Keats. But to Blake's credit he very well may be the only poet to make me feel a sort of nervous excitement.
I reconnect on so many levels when I read Blake. Let me quote from the Song of Los: Times rolled o'er all the sons of Har, time after time Orc on Mount Atlas howld, chain'd down with the Chain of Jealousy Then Oothon hovered over Judah & Jerusalem And Jesus heard her voice (a man of sorrows) he received A Gospel from wretched Theotormon."
All things change, decay, and are reborn. That is only a part of Blake's message. Highly Recomended!
Growing up I hated poetry, but Blake was the one that changed that. I found Blake's rhymes pleasing to the ear and I could understand how poetry could convey more than simple prose alone. What I enjoy most about Blake's poetry is when he creates poems in opposition to each other, such as in the Songs of Innocence and Songs of Experience.