What do you think?
Rate this book
A Dictionary of Modern Legal Usage
With double the length and coverage of the original, this new edition of A Dictionary of Modern Legal Usage ( DMLU ) thoroughly marshals and analyzes modern legal vocabulary. Since the first edition, Bryan A. Garner has drawn on his unrivaled experience as a legal editor to refine his positions
on legal usage and to add a wealth of new material. Here's how Garner's revision makes DMLU , Second Edition
-- Updates every existing entry, making this a second edition in the fullest sense;
-- Adds hundreds of new entries;
-- Adds hundreds of new sections within existing entries;
-- Adds over 3,000 new illustrative quotations from judicial opinions and leading lawbooks by prominent legal commentators;
-- Reconsiders previously held positions, now saying, for example, that contractions are sometimes permissible in legal writing;
-- Fully elaborates ideas only mentioned in the first edition;
-- Takes into account numerous comments received from first edition users;
-- Expands and updates cross-references to guide readers quickly and easily.
Influential writers and editors rely on DMLU daily. Charles Alan Wright, for example, says, "I consult Garner regularly. He offers authoritative guidance on many matters of usage that are unique to legal writing....Garner is almost always pithy; he is often witty. Any lawyer, no matter how expert
on words and language, is sure to learn from Garner's fine book." And the editors of Harvard Law Review have found it "In a work worthy of comparison to Fowler's Dictionary of Modern English Usage , Mr. Garner...sets forth an authoritative guide to American legal usage and style. All legal
writers will find it an invaluable help; many law review editors will find it a source of delight. Don't confront your editor without it."
-- Functions both as a style guide and as a law dictionary
-- Guides writers to distinguish between true terms of law and mere jargon
-- Illustrates recommended forms of expression as well as common blunders with thousands of quotations and citations
-- Explains the origins of expressions lawyers regularly use, such as Know all men by these presents , or party of the first part
-- Records and evaluates more than 100 twentieth-century neologisms, from conclusory to farminor , from Mirandize to representee
-- Distinguishes American from British usage and refers to current practice among Australian, Canadian, and Scottish legal writers
-- Solves editorial problems by dealing with practical writing issues
-- Offers wit and erudition reminiscent of H.W. Fowler, author of the first so-called usage dictionary.
In short, in its Second Edition DMLU remains, as one reviewer hailed it in 1987, "truly unique in the literature of law." It is an essential resource for practicing lawyers, scholars of the law, and libraries of all sizes and types.
on legal usage and to add a wealth of new material. Here's how Garner's revision makes DMLU , Second Edition
-- Updates every existing entry, making this a second edition in the fullest sense;
-- Adds hundreds of new entries;
-- Adds hundreds of new sections within existing entries;
-- Adds over 3,000 new illustrative quotations from judicial opinions and leading lawbooks by prominent legal commentators;
-- Reconsiders previously held positions, now saying, for example, that contractions are sometimes permissible in legal writing;
-- Fully elaborates ideas only mentioned in the first edition;
-- Takes into account numerous comments received from first edition users;
-- Expands and updates cross-references to guide readers quickly and easily.
Influential writers and editors rely on DMLU daily. Charles Alan Wright, for example, says, "I consult Garner regularly. He offers authoritative guidance on many matters of usage that are unique to legal writing....Garner is almost always pithy; he is often witty. Any lawyer, no matter how expert
on words and language, is sure to learn from Garner's fine book." And the editors of Harvard Law Review have found it "In a work worthy of comparison to Fowler's Dictionary of Modern English Usage , Mr. Garner...sets forth an authoritative guide to American legal usage and style. All legal
writers will find it an invaluable help; many law review editors will find it a source of delight. Don't confront your editor without it."
-- Functions both as a style guide and as a law dictionary
-- Guides writers to distinguish between true terms of law and mere jargon
-- Illustrates recommended forms of expression as well as common blunders with thousands of quotations and citations
-- Explains the origins of expressions lawyers regularly use, such as Know all men by these presents , or party of the first part
-- Records and evaluates more than 100 twentieth-century neologisms, from conclusory to farminor , from Mirandize to representee
-- Distinguishes American from British usage and refers to current practice among Australian, Canadian, and Scottish legal writers
-- Solves editorial problems by dealing with practical writing issues
-- Offers wit and erudition reminiscent of H.W. Fowler, author of the first so-called usage dictionary.
In short, in its Second Edition DMLU remains, as one reviewer hailed it in 1987, "truly unique in the literature of law." It is an essential resource for practicing lawyers, scholars of the law, and libraries of all sizes and types.
984 pages, Hardcover
First published December 3, 1987
7 people are currently reading
160 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4 reviews
February 13, 2024
Absolute must have for anyone who must read any legal document that uses legalese to try and confuse them
February 14, 2024
A trove of linguistic treasures. Gardner's prose is clean, elegant, and practical. I have acquired many delicious words. "Afflatus" alone was worth every penny.
August 18, 2012
A must-have for all legal writers and journalists. Garner's latest edition, his 3rd, recently published in 2011--retitled Garner's Dictionary of Legal Usage--improves on an already-valuable resource.
August 11, 2013
Great book. Boring for non-lawyers.
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4 reviews