GREAT concept, but, I'm sorry to say, awful execution. The entire thing reads like a high school report.
I assume the target audience of this book is fellow Asian-American women. The first few chapters are filled with basic experiences that are obvious to any Asian-American woman. Model minority myth? Yeah, we know what that is, and if you can provide a more in-depth and researched explanation of why it's problematic, that'd be great, but the discussion is shallow and basic.
The grammar sucks. "For a child, they had to obey their father. For married women, they had to obey their husbands." Bruh....
Instead of giving proper evidence and letting the reader think for themselves, Chan keeps interjecting with her own opinions: "This is just appalling." "It's unbelievable/horrifying that..."
It's simply not well-written. A segment on the untouchability of girls on their periods in India: "When an Indian woman gets her period for the first time, it was a celebration for her. They would prepare a big ceremony because it was a sign that she was ready to get married. This is why periods have been such a taboo to speak about in any culture. What is natural for a woman is considered to be dirty and impure." Besides the high-school-esque language, why would you refer to a girl (yes, girls usually get their first periods around the age of 12) as a "woman"? We really ought to choose our language carefully, and not refer to child marriage as marriage of "women". Besides, the first two sentence are have the opposite meaning of the last two. Just not well-thought out.
I had been really excited to read this book, because I really believe in the existence of a great book on this topic, but this is not it. With all due respect, go take a grammar class.