Re-reading “The Ambassadors” Is Strether a naive 55year old man who gets duped into believing his prospective son-in-law Chad has a “virtuous” attachment to the French Countess Marie de Vionnet, currently separated from her beast of a husband? Or is he a sensitive, imaginative’ young at heart detective who figures out what is really important in life? Is everyone he meets cleverly deceiving him? Or encouraging him?
Moved on to The Wings of the Dove:
James’s fictions are like detective stories or a very sophisticated game of Clue where the reader has to guess how much a given character knows, or what emotional crimes he or she may have committed. My own reading of the novel persuades me to admire the way that Maggie decides to exile Charlotte and Adam to American City, so that she Maggie can prevent her husband the Prince Amerigo from ever seeing Charlotte again. Maggie in effect sacrifices her father (whom she dearly loves) in order to save her husband (for herself). Maggie would rather never see her father again, than allow Charlotte to steal Amerigo away from her. Maggie’s decision is cruel, but it’s how she chooses to survive. In this “check mate” maneuver, Maggie gets the ultimate revenge on Charlotte. Amerigo, the straying husband, seems to be an easy-going guy, and I feel he’ll forget about Charlotte if he’s separated from her by the Atlantic Ocean. Adam Verver can continue collecting antiquities, but exile in America will be very difficult for his wife Charlotte.