David Underdown challenges both traditional Whig as well as some revisionist accounts of popular politics before, during, and after the English Revolution. Based largely in linguistic methods of analysis, Underdown masterfully analyzes primary sources—from ballads to libels to newspapers— to support his persuasive argument that, contrary to both traditional and revisionist interpretations, there was actually much continuity and interaction in the popular politics of both the gentry and “lower orders” of society during this period. The most convincing part of Underdown’s argument is simply how he frames and understands popular politics which he understands as being expressed through a commonly held “political language” grounded in commonly held understandings of patriarchal authority and the “Ancient Constitution” of England. Overall, although written almost 30 years ago, a fantastic work— can’t wait to read more of Underdown’s work