Authoritative dismissal of a book you cannot remember at all
Gattling-Fenn was a master of this ploy, and his method deserves careful study. Rather than admit total ignorance, he would invariably sidestep into talking about a different book, while somehow conveying the impression that the first one was too unimportant to be worth discussing. If pressed, he could comfortably repeat the move two or even three times. Here is a particularly striking example:
MAN AT PARTY: So what do you think of Supermanship, Gattling?
GATTLING-FENN: Ah, those Stephen Potter books are marvelous, aren't they? I virtually know Gamesmanship by heart. Thanks to the Potter Gambit, several people now believe I am an expert chess player...
MAN AT PARTY: But is Supermanship any good?
GATTLING-FENN: I think Lifemanship is just as accomplished as its predecessor. His advice on wine - brilliant, isn't it? "Red wine is red, white wine is yellow." And that phrase "boldly meaningless". He really captures something there...
MAN AT PARTY: Very well, but what about Supermanship?
GATTLING-FENN: Needless to say, it was impossible to keep it going for ever. All the same, Oneupmanship has its moments, don't you agree? "Giving embarrassing presents" - quite wonderful. And I can never leave a train without recalling his classification of the different types of passenger...
WIFE OF MAN AT PARTY: I'm afraid we need to be making our goodbyes, dear.
GATTLING-FENN: Oh, what a pity. Your husband and I have just discovered our shared admiration for Stephen Potter. We'll have to talk about Supermanship next time. There are a couple of thoughts I absolutely must share with you...