This is one of the stupidest books I have ever read. Why? It reads like one of those dietary books that tells you all other dietary methods are useless and only the author’s teaching processes will achieve literary success.
I first entered the classroom as a student teacher in 1972. I started my career as an English as a Second Language teacher. I worked in numerous positions in the field of education. Gained a bachelor’s and master’s degrees in education, became a principal and the after my retirement returned to the role of an ESL teacher, teaching Afghan refugees. I did casual teaching in classes K – 12 for two and a half years during COVID. I now live in Asia and tutor students in English.
The absurdity of this book is the idea that if you teach students her thirty-five rules there will be immediate success in literary achievement: It doesn’t happen.
Denise Eide makes claims about a literacy crisis exists (She is relating this data to USA but many believe it exists throughout the English speaking world) then quotes unsourced figures, “34% of fourth graders cannot read.” “69% of our eighth graders are below grade average” (I ask how can you have 69% below average, wouldn’t 50% be below and 50% above) I always wonder where these expected performance figures came from? Was there a golden age when all children read, wrote and spelt brilliantly? There wasn’t. For over 50 years I have heard this tired mantra about falling literacy standards.
There are 35 rules she says that young readers must follow. Some young readers have difficulty remember 35 words!
I argue that the greatest inhibitor to learning literary skills is engagement, the willingness and the sustainability of a student to want to learn and the continued engagement in the learning process. The most successful learner is the one who actively engages with the teacher and the resource materials to acquire the skills and knowledge being presented.
Why there is such a disparity in engagement should be the focus of study, not some list of grammar and spelling rules.
The teacher’s role is to create the most engaging environment so that a maximum number of students are participating in the learning process. Good teachers are those who engage with their students.
You would not find a teacher in any K – 2 faculty that doesn’t see the need to teach phonics, the issue is for how long does a teacher’s teaching program focus purely on phonics and how does the teacher meet the various needs of their students? For many readers phonics is the key to starting the learning of reading. For most students the use of phonics in the skill of reading evaporates as they develop a wide range of sight words and then as they gain meaning they start to read groups of words. I have taught Year 1 students who are capable of writing several paragraphs of syntax sensible sentences.
This author never discusses the essence of reading, gaining meaning.
Like swimming, running, cycling once you have acquired the basics you improve by training by applying different strategies to the basic movements. It is much the same in reading.
If you want to be a good reader, then choose your parents carefully. If you come from a literate family where there are much reading material available, where the child has adult readers who act as models, where speaking and listening are valued, then the chances are you will develop the skill, and maybe more importantly, the love of reading.
Eide addresses none of these, rather she devotes page after page of rules and examples.
Acquiring the ability to read is not the same as acquiring the ability to speak. There are neurological disorders that can prohibit the development of speech; Childhood Apraxia of Speech (CAS) and Cri Du Chat syndrome. Some autistic children are mute. Generally, the vast majority of humans learn to speak without the need for specific instruction. Speaking has been part of human ability for tens of thousands of years. Reading for the majority has been around for a few centuries.
Reading appears to be a far more complex learning process than speaking. Very few children learn to read without pedological assistance.
The author argues that English is a logical language, yet she states that it is an extremely complex language. If it is so logical, why does it have so many rules with exceptions. I wonder if she knows any other language. There is no proof that acquiring a first language is more difficult no matter what language.
Unfortunately, there are too many language messiahs claiming that they have the answer to reading acquisition. Sadly, there are too many governments, usually right-wing governments who see teachers as being incapable of designing appropriate learning programs and phonic based programs as the panacea for improved literacy outcomes. Eide’s book adds little to the discussion of how to teach children the literary skills necessary to survive and thrive in our changing world.