This best-selling, mainstream American government text is both a comprehensive introduction and a complete program, with the print text and ancillaries carefully crafted to work together to benefit both instructor and student. The Ninth Edition maintains its highly acclaimed, non-ideological framework, exploring three themes: freedom, order, and equality as political values; the majoritarianism vs. pluralism debate; and globalization's effect on American politics. Extensively updated, this edition includes new examples, figures, and data and current discussions on such topics as the 2006 Congressional election, the Bush administration, campaign finance reform, Hurricane Katrina and FEMA, immigration policy, MEDICARE, and more.Continuing to offer leading-edge technology for teaching and learning, the program now offers course content in Eduspace, Blackboard, and WebCT formats. Additional media tools include the new In Our Own Words feature--downloadable chapter overviews in MP3 format narrated by the authors--and marginal references to the award-winning site, IDEAlog.org.
This was my textbook for American Government in college. It was actually pretty engaging as far as textbooks go and not overly dry! It was also pretty current and up to date, which I really appreciated.
Its not terrible in terms of the writing didn't make sense. But more that this book that one could easily tell is attempting to spread its agenda through definitions and wordings. We went over this in my AP government class and almost every single student could tell that these writers were attempting to invoke certain messages through their wordings and explanations. If you read this, then you'll know
This book is often described as "non-ideological" as though there were some totally objective, non-political way to discuss politics. When, quite simply, there isn't. Any choice a teacher makes in how to discuss an issue or present information is going to entail ideological choices, whether we choose to admit it or not.
What I think the non-ideological descriptor means here is that this book fits well within the dominant frames with which we discuss politics in the U.S. However, that is, in its own way, ideological. The authors present a very narrow view of what democratic politics could be. The discussion here focuses on majoritarianism v. pluralism and is firmly entrenched in a SMDP, two party way of thinking about politics. Even in their comparisons with "other" democratic systems, they choose to compare us to the UK (rather than comparing with a PR/MMP system). As a result, the authors miss an opportunity to illustrate to students that our way of doing democracy is not the only way, the best way, or even a very democratic way.
Since this book leaves other ways of doing democracy completely unexamined and assumes a kind of status quo position vis-a-vis American Politics, it appears "non-ideological" to many. But I couldn't help but feel as though this book was very ideological in that it doesn't offer students the opportunity to think about how we might do democracy differently and better.
I'm generally skeptical of civics textbooks, but this is decent. It covers topics relevant to the American government without falling into ideology or propaganda and is as good of a starting point as any.