Is it me, or does that picture look like a really huge nipple next to her face? I still can't figure out what it's supposed to be after reading the book. The professor in this book is a "Harvey Weinstein" character but much handsomer.
Sidenote: if H.W. had been an over-the-top, handsome, hunk of a man, would all of the women he molested have willingly gone along with his play for sex, like all the "men-in-authority" genres ( billionaires, bosses, professors, step-daddies, step-brothers, alien princes/generals, rough bikers/construction/cowboys, alpha shifters, or alpha any guys) we all read? Do we really want to be dominated? Or is it the hot, hard, sweaty sex we're after? Would a nerdy guy (weak, skinny, scraggly) be able to give us the same satisfaction, so long as he knew how lap pussy, had a big enough dong, and knew how to use it?
These are questions I ask myself when reading dark stories or really bad stories.
Anyway... my review is longer than the book. Does anyone read these low level reviews besides me? Back to topic - He uses a poorly written, plagarized, paper the freshman, 18 year old student hands in to manipulate her into having sex. That is NOT okay with me. A female writer should know better than to write that kind of junk. That's actually little better than statutory rape, as many 18 year old girls are not sophisticated enough to stand up to an authority figure. Even in this day and age. Girls who consider themselves "good" don't buck their bosses.