What do you think?
Rate this book


120 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1987
To NorlineWhen I was younger and seemingly stuck on a far less appropriate path, I tended towards psyching myself out with lists of classics, prize winners, 'difficult' reads, and other literary establishments leaving their snail trails through my instinctive evaluations of what has to be good, personal evaluation aside. I've been making up for it in recent days with far too many painful revisitings of popularly, and previously personally, lauded figures, ridding myself of ivory tower fetish by demanding each text prove itself without any aid from the status quo chorus. Derek Walcott is one of many with whom my initial engagement is suspect, and so when this less GR-friend evaluated text crossed my path, I picked it up to see whether all my talk about Omeros was, simply, talk. What an unexpected pleasure, then, to find that not only do I still have a taste for poetry, but also that I'd kill for another person in the line of Walcott to win this year's Nobel Prize for Lit. I've found many a person who fits the profile, so now all that's left is for the stodgy pop music inundated gits to humor me a little.
This beach will remain empty
for more slate-coloured dawns
of lines the surf continually
erases with its sponge,
and someone else will come
from the still-sleeping house,
a coffee mug warming his palm
as my body once cupped yours,
to memorize this passage
of a salt-sipping tern,
like when some line on a page
is loved, and it's hard to turn.
There was never any peaceThere's a particular popular piece of modern poetry that I've been planning to read whose top reviews preen in their abbreviated variations on the theme of 'this isn't poetry', which is so fucking boring that I have to imagine how these people made their way out of elementary school. The whole history of poetry has been nothing more and nothing less than a dramatic series of fuck yous to the previous iterations of such, so to conceptualize poetry as anything other than a responsive crystallization to conscientious antagonism is to further extend Christo-centric creationism into the secular realm. One could say that the poetry is boring or full of itself or isn't too one's aesthetic taste, but to say poetry isn't poetry is to undermine the very point of what constitutes as little more than a physical manifestation of a thought exercise, so if one wants to knock one poet, one better prepare to give up their Wordsworth and Shakespeare and Keats. The fact that Walcott pricks the sensibilities less merely means he's more subtle about his subversion, not less. Folks may compare him to an Elizabethan, but no white person could have ever written "The Arkansas Testament", for no white person will ever give up their whiteness.
in the spokes of parasols,
for peace only exists
in the leaf-shadowed prose
of the imaginary republic, its
Impressionist canvases.
Our myths are ignorance, theirs are literature.I'll be picking up more of Walcott, but his history of sexual assault will moderate the intake accordingly.
- White Magic, for Leo St. Helene, pg. 38-39
- Elsewhere, for Stephen Spender, pg. 66-67
- Pentecost, pg. 90