AN ARGUMENT BY TWO PROGRESSIVE CHRISTIANS SUPPORTING ALL MARRIAGE
Authors David G. Myers and Letha Dawson Scanzoni wrote in the ‘Personal Letter to Our Readers’ of this 2005 book, “This is a book about marriage. We believe in marriage. We want to see it strengthened. Knowing that strong, healthy, loving relationships are beneficial to the individuals involved and to any children they might have, we want to see couples flourish. We also believe that society, by supporting marriage, benefits as well. The ceremony tells us that marriage is a holy estate … From this time forward, they will be united in life’s closest relationship… Ideally, this is what it means to be joined together by God in marriage. And yet some who have yearned for such public commitment have been denied it… The burning question in our day is whether persons of the same sex should be prevented from sealing their love commitment in socially recognized marriage… [Some] suggest that permitting persons of the same sex to marry will destroy the institution. We think not. We believe that opening marriage for gay and lesbian people could actually strengthen the institution for all people. In this book we will show why we believe that.”
In the first chapter, they explain, “we aim to show why pro-marriage voices are right. Massive evidence reveals that children, adults, and communities thrive where marriage abounds. Liberals need to appreciate that conservatives such as [James] Dobson have good reason for worrying that ‘the implications for children in a world of decaying families are profound.’ … we need to step back and ask how we might create a more marriage-supporting social ecology---and, with it, happier and happier healthier people are flourishing neighborhoods. Second, we aim to show why we marriage supporters at the same time comfortably join many other heterosexual Christians in supporting the aspirations of gay and lesbian person… this book doesn’t advocate a special type of marriage---‘gay marriage’; it advocates strengthening MARRIAGE, and extending it as an option for another 3 percent of so of the population. By so doing we hope to offer a bridge across the divide.” (Pg. 4)
They explain, “Even today’s more tolerant and accepting environment seems not to have altered rates of sexual orientation (despite fears about the influence of gay role models such as Ellen DeGeneres and Elton John). Nor has being reared in a straight, conservative home predetermined sexual orientation, as the gay or lesbian children of Vice President Dick Chene… conservative activist Phyllis Schlafly, and of Pete Knight, a California state senator and the sponsor of California’s anti-gay-marriage Proposition 22, could testify. Moreover, children reared by gay parents, like children reared by straight persons, usually grow up to be heterosexual.” (Pg. 59)
About Christian ministries that argue that ‘reorientation of same-sex attraction is possible,’ they note, “What troubles skeptics is that time and time again such powerful testimonials turn out to have been false, self-deceptive, or from people who never were generally homosexual. More than a dozen such organizations have, after touting successes, been abandoned by their own founders, who are now ‘EX-ex-gays.’ Jeff Ford, a former executive director of a Minnesota ex-gay program and a former ‘national speaker for Exodus,’ acknowledges that, despite his claims of being ‘healed’ of homosexuality and of helping others to be ‘healed,’ he actually ‘did not see that happen in my work with other three hundred gay and lesbian people.’” (Pg. 75)
They conclude, “Today’s marriage war is a clash of those rightly concerned about marriage and the well-being of children versus those eager to encourage committed bonds and associated rights for gays and lesbians. Might it be possible to say that BOTH are right, and thus for conservatives to get their juice and liberals their peel?... Might we then come together in honest, honest, open dialogue? In small groups, might we engage one another in the spirit of Christ?” (Pg. 135)
Marriage equality is now the law of the land, of course; but this book will still interest those studying the issue retroactively.