The autobiography of a revolutionary Leila Khaled. "The most obvious moral of this book is that violence always breeds more violence. The Nazis subjected the Jews to violence. The Jews treated the Palestinians with violence. The Palestinians see violence as the only means of recovering their country and their freedom. At the age of twenty, Leila Khaled wrote, "armed struggle is the way of salvation"....Yet this determined young woman did not call on her comrades to exterminate the Israelis or to drive them into the sea. When victory is won, she says, we will establish a democratic state in Palestine with Jews and native Palestinians on equal terms. The author's descriptions of her hijacking exploits are vividly written and exciting. We do not often have the opportunity to hear an account of such incidents written by the hijacker rather than by the victims.
Leila Khaled is a Palestinian refugee and member of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine. Khaled came to public attention for her role in the TWA Flight 840 hijacking in 1969 and one of the four simultaneous Dawson's Field hijackings the following year as part of the campaign of Black September in Jordan.
"As a Palestinian, I had to belive in the gun as an embodiment of my humanity and my determination to liberate myself and my fellow men. Every self-respecting Palestinian had to become a revolutionary.
Leila Khaled gives a thorough account of events that took place during her life filled occasionally with her own brand of humor. Overall, inspiring and deeply emotional. Definitely a must-read.
Yesterday, San Francisco State University had intended to hold a meeting with Leila Khaled. Zoom refused to host it. SFSU managed a 20 minute livestream on Youtube before it was also taken down. Since they spent those twenty minutes congratulating Khaled, she did not even have the time to speak. I found myself following all of this with so much curiosity (who needs sleep when you can follow political drama in the states?).
Leila Khaled is a terrorist. And not in a political slandering way. She literally hijacked two planes. And yet, organizations that claim to believe in non-violent resistance like BDS and JVP supported her. The organizers of the event claimed that the event was being targeted by extreme right wing Zionists, by racists and antisemitism, by people who want to silence Palestinian voices. It was bizarre to hear because opposing terrorism is a pretty mainstream position (and come on, it can't be antisemitism when no Jews are involved). None of us want to find ourselves in a hijacked plane, even if it's for Palestinian freedom.
The organizers of the event suggested that academic freedom also means letting Khaled speak and it is here that I agree with them. I genuinely can't think of a single person that I wouldn't be okay with hearing on Zoom. I understand why social media platforms shouldn't be a space for promoting violence but it's a shame that voices were silenced this way. The problem is that no sane organization should be supporting violence against civilians, especially the kind that doesn't yield any positive results (like, come on, what would a plane hijacking bring? more security on Israeli flights! that's it).
In any case, I cannot fathom the mental gymnastics one has to go through in order to end up claiming an actual plane hijacker is a hero and a symbol of feminism. I had hoped to go to the webinar in order to understand how you can possibly be a leftist who fights against racism and homophobia but is okay with attacking civilians. Since the webinar was cancelled, this book is perhaps the closest I'll get.
In thick and clumsy prose, Khaled (with the help of Hajjar) recounts her life. This was published in 1973 so it ends with Khaled as a 29 year old. In between anecdotes of her life and radicalization, she weaves in big chunks of heavily biased history. I mostly feel bad for her that she sees the world as if it is a battlefield between the West and the Arab world, as if the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is a global battle between imperialism and oppressed people.
The thing is, no matter how many Palestinians I hear, I still haven't heard a solid counter argument for the basic Israeli claim: Palestinians started the war in 1948 and they lost it. I realize that losing her home has brought much hardship and pain for Khaled and Palestinians in general but at the end of the day, they insisted on getting into military battles with Israel and then lost every single one (kind of, the Lebanon wars seem to be a loss for everyone and nothing was really achieved with the 2014 war).
The highlight of this book for me was hearing her description of the plane hijackings themselves. It's wild to hear her rationalize it to herself. She tries so hard to convince us that a plane hijacking is harmless, that it's a way to make her voice heard. She attempts to shrug away the terrorist label but it's just so unconvincing. Those people on that Amsterdam-New York flight didn't have anything to do with Palestine and it's wrong to put them in danger for any kind of ideal. That's really what terror is.
Khaled is pathetic in her desire to pretend her terrorist organization is an organized army. Saying that she's a commando, claiming that she's a prisoner of war when she's in prison for her deeds is just silly. As I see it, the difference between an army and a terrorist organization is that the army is limited by some sense of morals, by laws. An army is limited by its government (this is really why I did not continue with the army and instead chose to study politics). The PFLP aren't limited by anyone.
In general, reading this book in 2020 highlights exactly where Palestinian leadership went wrong. Palestinians are going to have to compromise. This Palestinian nostalgia of the past is going to leave Palestinians stuck. People like Leila Khaled simply do not want to compromise. They want everything and they're willing to do whatever it takes to get it. That just creates more military battles and well, in 2020 it's not a fair fight and Israel keeps winning. Is this progress?
It's hard to separate between Khaled's opinions about Palestine and her thoughts about a pan-Arab socialist country. I don't know if this is a generational thing or a me thing but I no longer feel excited by revolutionaries. We don't need people blowing stuff up. What we need is policy and community work. Those things aren't as glamourous but I really do believe slow and steady changes are lasting while revolutions often end in more bloodshed. What can Khaled bring to the table that isn't violent?
Khaled spends much time talking about "ending the Zionist regime" but doesn't bother discussing how the future state will actually function. Sure, she says that it'll be a democratic state with rights for Jews and Arabs but she doesn't clarify how socialism will work or how the heck it will function. Not to mention that you can't ignore that Jews have nationalist desires which won't be curbed by giving them minority rights. There are actual problems here that aren't going to be solved simply by toppling the Israeli government.
There's a part of me that regrets the webinar was cancelled because I have questions for Khaled now. If she excuses her own hijacking, does she excuse other acts of terror? Where does she stop? When does it stop being okay? How did she move to Jordan and why? Apparently she has kids now, did she tell them about this? What do they think? How have her opinions changed since writing this book? As a seventy year old now, what does she think will happen?
To conclude, this book isn't well written. It's interesting but my low rating comes because I think Khaled does not deserve our admiration. At its best, Khaled manages to describe her strong emotions but for the most part, this book is just not built very well and also supports terrorism (but doesn't even manage to grapple with the morals of it, I can admire and respect different moral arguments when they're well thought).
What I'm Taking With Me - I just finished a two hour Zoom call with my Palestinian and Israeli friends from the seminar and wow, there's such a difference. Like, hey Leila, a Palestinian from Bethlehem just invited us, a group of Zionists, to visit his home and promised he'd make us knafeh. - Let's take a moment to talk about that one person during the event who said "everyone keeps focusing on one moment from Leila's life" and I'm just here like, first of all, it was two moments. - You know, if anything, this book convinced me that Israeli security is important. Like, without those two air marshals on the El-Al flight, Khaled would have succeeded yet again. That's unfortunate because I really want to believe our security is overdone. - Khaled's best attempt at excusing her actions is that part when she says that the oppressors can't determine the morality of the oppressed. Say I accept that, who can? Does being oppressed grant you the right to behave in whatever way you want? -This book pinpoints why Israelis from my parents' generations believe peace is impossible. - Wow, feminism, first woman to hijack a plane. Really breaking barriers for women.
------------------------------- I just signed up for a uni course about Palestinian nationalism but looking at the way things are going this summer, I'll be really bored of learning about Palestinian things by the time I get to that course. Review to come!
“As a child of four, I found myself burdened by the adult problems of life and death, right and wrong. I, as a dreamer, living on the bare subsistence provided by a UN blue ration card, in a crowded room, on a side street in Sour, stand as a witness to Zionist inhumanity. I charge the world for its acquiescence in my destruction.”~Leila Khaled
I finally was able to read this book. It's difficult to find since it is no longer in publication and banned in many places across the world. Thankfully, there are digital copies in circulation online since any physical copy sells for upwards of $600 on eBay, meanwhile Hitler's autobiography can be found in any American bookshop in all formats including leather-bound collector's editions. Leila Khaled is primarily known for her role in the PFLP where she hijacked two planes, getting plastic surgery to reconstruct her face in between both events, without harming anyone in order to gain the world's attention. When we look at how in 2022 Palestinians are being shadow-banned and silenced in mainstream media and all social media platforms you cannot imagine how much harder it was to get Palestine on global radar in 1969. You cannot talk about decolonization, fighting oppression, apartheid, occupation, or genocide without also noting a people's right to armed struggle. You cannot criticize the actions of the oppressed without criticizing the oppressor, which is what many imperialists do when it comes to indigenous people fighting against their colonizers. You cannot support the violence of the colonizers and expect non-violence from the colonized. Until you note the violence, dehumanization, and horrors that an oppressed people are subjected to that led them to the desperation of needing to hijack a plan in order to get the media attention on the genocide and takeover of their country you should remain silent. No civilians were harmed. From Palestine to the First Nations of North and South America to the Khoisan of South Africa to the Irish of Northern Ireland all people have the right to armed resistance in the face of oppression, most especially in asymmetrical power dynamics. In many of the books I've read about the Irish Troubles the Irish of occupied Northern Ireland have always held solidarity with Palestinians and many looked up to Leila Khaled for partaking in armed struggle much like they did against the British army. However, as we have clearly seen within recent events unfolding in Ukraine imperialism deems armed struggle acceptable or noble only when those resisting occupation are the 'right kind of white' (i.e. applause for use of molotov cocktails, suicide bombing against the Russian army, support of Ukrainian paramilitary groups, etc). Leila Khaled was a child when the Nakba began and this is her story of becoming a refugee and what led to her role in the resistance of the Israeli occupation. It was interesting to read about the formation of the PFLP, PLO, and other Palestinian resistance groups. I really liked reading the parts about how she fought for her place in the resistance as a woman, much like how many women in the Black liberation movement fought against the underlying sexism from their comrades. It just goes to show that no movement of resistance against racial oppression is complete without also including sexism and classism. This book is an important read. I plan on reading Sarah Irving's biography on Leila which seems to have updated information about her life beyond the PLO and global infamy as an icon of Palestinian liberation.
This is a pretty cool book. I had added it to my "to read" list over a decade ago, and then, like so many other books I own, I put it on the back burner. Given recent events in Palestine, I decided to dust it off and finally check it out.
To start with the negative, the main thing that kind of irked me about the book was the overt Communist rhetoric. That might've been more appealing to me back when I first added the book to my list, but I've changed a lot since then. Back then, I was a practicing Muslim but also had some extreme Leftist beliefs. Nowadays, my political views come mainly from Islam rather than either extreme in modern secular politics. I don't claim to be the best Muslim, but I try not to follow anything that contradicts my religion.
That is really my only gripe with this book, and given the time period in which it was written, I can't be too upset about it. Leila Khaled was a brave warrior for the cause, and I have a lot of respect for her for that reason. Her verbal takedown of Israeli, American, and Arab governments are on-point and well-said, and I liked the fact that she went into the history of many modern political issues in the Middle East rather than solely her own life story. Given the fact that the book was published in 1973, however, a lot would change about the leadership of the region not long after.
I was a bit taken aback by the negative way she described the Syrian Ba'ath Party and then-future-President Hafez al-Assad, given that she now allegedly supports the continuation of that government through Assad's son Bashar. But, as my opinions have changed in the last decade, I'm sure hers have changed in the last 50 years.
I really just recommend this book for anyone trying to get into the mindset of a Palestinian resistance fighter from the late '60s and early '70s peak of revolutionary fighting against Israel. At time of writing, Ms. Khaled is still with us, so I'm just kind of disappointed that we don't have a Part 2.
this book doesn’t end definitively, it ends with a reminder that there is more. that people will keep fighting. the revolution will live on and the people will win. not just palestine but there will be a day when all colonized people will know total liberation. stories like hers are brilliant but let’s not fall into the mindset that they’re a one in a million tale, we CAN do it. perhaps not exactly in her steps but we can do SOMETHING!
“revolution and peace. greetings to all lovers of the oppressed!”
there really is such a deep sense of love in this book. love for the land the people and the comrades. it made me emotional at times. it perfectly illustrates che’s wonderful quote: “At the risk of seeming ridiculous, let me say that the true revolutionary is guided by a great feeling of love. It is impossible to think of a genuine revolutionary lacking this quality”!
this was so inspiring. leila khaled is truly an inspiration for every revolutionary and more people should know not only about her revolutionary work but also her dedication
leila khaled isn't a name that is new to me, i have come across her name and revolutionary work so many times and i can never stress how important her feats and dedication are, especially considering the many barriers she faced as a woman, an arab woman, and as an arab palestinian woman. the ferocity of her assertions and spirit is clear from the text and reflects what we see even today in so many palestinian journalists and individuals in general. she narrates the chronology of her life within the larger framework of all the important political developments within the arab world and imperial core, and is very useful if one would like a place to begin on when it comes to palestine and the place of women such as her in the liberation of palestine
La Leila ens fa un repàs social i històric que ens ajuda a entendre la situació a l'Orient Mitjà des de la seva visió com a dona. Va néixer a Haifa i amb quatre anys la seva família i ella es van veure obligats a abandonar Palestina i s'estableixen als camps de refugiats del Líban. Això la marca de per vida i adquireix des de ben petita un compromís amb el seu poble. Lluita per l'alliberament de Palestina i tot això la construeix com a militant i revolucionària. Coneguda internacionalment pel segrest de dos avions, els anys 1969 i 1970, el primer amb èxit i el segon acaba amb la mort del seu company nicaragüenc i el seu arrest.
Ens parla de l'autodeterminació, de la consciència política, de la resistència i de la construcció d'una societat socialista.
🍉 Que aquest 2025 sigui l'any que aturem el genocidi a Palestina!
Palestine, my love! for you I shall fight fight and open the road the road of return victorious return to all parents to all lovers. Today I am a volcano a revolutionary volcano the Front-Volcano the Front-revolution. Yes-the revolt of return (...) Yes, we have lost everything: we have lost life and its meaning; we have lost the humanity of man; we are a people that lost its land; and he who loses his land loses his life-for land is the source of life. My beloved, I shall return on the wings of eagles to you;
Leila Khaled is a revolutionary in the fullest sense of the word. This is a deeply important account in the ongoing fight for Palestinian liberation. Even before her political radicalization she makes the statement, “I was eleven years old and Israel was seven.” This was a meaningful reminder to me that contrary to the insistence of Zionists and their imperialist allies, Israel is a recent machination.
I enjoyed her discussion about halfway in, when she is prompted “to recognize and think about our obligations to our people…. We must act, not just talk and memorise the arguments against Zionism.” For the remainder of the memoir it becomes clear that she has taken up this task with serious conviction. She has a deep love for her people—and for all exploited, marginalized people—and has committed her life to fighting the forces that target these people. I feel fortunate to have read this book.
"How miserable can one become when one thinks only of oneself and no others. How despondent can one become when one imagines that one is the third pivot of the world; How insipid life becomes when one remembers that one's life is coming to an end. Oh my soul, how I hate your rebelliousness when all of me aches.Be merciful, my soul, for a moment. Have I not been your obedient slave? I feel a very strange feeling ... how childish! I long for love ... love ... love I shall resist this longing, but I am overcome I shall hearken to the voice of love. I shall embrace my beloved and sleep. I am in union with my humanity - with Palestine."
Δεν ήταν αυτό που περίμενα. Περίμενα ένα προσωπικό κείμενο και διάβασα πολιτικές διακηρύξεις και αναλύσεις. Δε θα σταθώ περισσότερο στο περιεχόμενο του βιβλίου, θα πω όμως ότι με κούρασε πολύ: υπερβολικά ξύλινη γλώσσα (για τα γούστα μου) στο μεγαλύτερο τμήμα, ενοχλητικό ύφος στα πιο προσωπικά κομμάτια και οριακά χαοτική αφήγηση με αλλεπάλληλα χρονικά μπρος πίσω.
If you want to understand the existential indignation, rage, passion and intellectual reasoning that pushes a dispossessed people into violent struggle against their oppressors (through a lens of socialist class warfare) this is a good place to start.
My feelings on this book (and many other things) are complicated, for reasons better explained to a therapist than here. Let's just say as a pacifist (coward?) who hates violence but longs for a free Palestine, in a world where diplomacy stalls time & again and violence against the oppressed is applauded while violence against the oppressors is condemned, I'm a mess of emotions and identity crises.
It's depressing and infuriating that, even though so much has changed, almost nothing at all has changed in 50 years. Imperialism and neo-colonialism still reigns and a true peaceful solution seems nowhere on the horizon.
«Our struggle will be long and arduous because the enemy is powerful, well-organised, and well sustained from abroad. We shall win because we represent the wave of the future, because we are the immense majority of the oppressed, because mankind is on our side, and above all because we are determined to achieve victory».
Leila Khaled debe ser un espejo en el que mirarnos. Qué persona tan integra, tan fuerte, tan inteligente y encima tan divertida. (Pequeño spoiler: ¿sentido de que después de tratar de secuestrar un avión y ser extraditada en un helicóptero militar le comente al piloto que ve más difícil secuestrar el helicóptero?).
He aprendido mucho con esta lectura, que es absolutamente inspiradora. Qué vida tan digna y qué valentía para hacerle frente a –literalmente– el mundo entero. por una causa tan noble. Palestina será libre desde el río hasta el mar. 🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸
A far-left progressive female revolutionary that fights for a secular state for both Arabs and Jews in Palestine, is unheard of in today’s media. And definitely not in the agenda.
Her methods I believe were not the most effective, and had irreparable backlash on the movement’s image. Though at the same time it reminds me of Nelson Mandela’s description of the impatience of the youth. She just wanted to take action somehow somewhere.
Similar to Shafiq Al-Hout’s story from inside the PLO, this story also sheds a light on the myriad of Palestinian movements that sprung up after 1948 in different refugee camps around historical Palestine, lead by people forcefully exiled from their homes. Even if all of them have a similar origin story, they don’t all agree on what methods should be used to achieve what.
It is important to know the methods of violence used and why - regardless of which side to support - to better understand the conflict. What one side paints as terrorism, is described as guerilla warfare by the other to take back stolen land. After all, how can a people “invade”the place were they grew up?
I read this thinking about Fanon's "On Violence" and this quote specifically stuck out to me:
“I do not see how my oppressor could sit in judgment on my response to his oppressive actions against me. He is in no position to render an impartial judgment or to accuse me of air piracy and hijacking when he has hijacked my home and hijacked me and my people out of our land. If the enemy defines morality and legality in his own terms and decides to apply his ethical and legal doctrines against me because he has the power as well as the means of communication to justify his inhumanity, I am under no moral obligation to listen, let alone obey his dictates. Indeed, I am under a moral obligation to resist and to fight to death the enemy’s moral corruption. My deed cannot be evaluated without examining the underlying causes” (pp. 126-127).
Probably the biggest difference here is Khaled writes as a direct member of the oppressed and as a revolutionary, rather than a scholar, meaning more lived experience than Fanon writing in the context of Algeria.
Bona aproximació ja no a la qüestió Palestina, sinó a la història recent d'Orient Mitjà. Un testimoni en primera persona d'uns anys en què tot encara pareixia possible. Potser se m'ha fet massa impostat el personatge. Jo hi anava cercant una autobiografia i això són més unes memòries polítiques, però entre soflames s'hi entreveu una personalitat exuberant i una passió romàntica per la revolució que vista des del cinisme millenial astora.
i can feel her deep love for her land. i'm in awe of her ferocity that is informed by her nuanced understanding of the dynamics and i never felt that she has a disregard for human life which seems to be the implication in the statements of people who critique her. the biography was very insightful to my understanding of the Palestinian struggle. it's always shocking how far the CIA spread its wings. too many people have betrayed the pure cause for a free palestine. i hope we are lucky enough to witness this phrase becoming a reality in our lifetime.
Una noia de 25 anys amb la seva kufiya i el seu AK-47 soviètic segrestant un vol amb destí a Tel Aviv als anys 60, moguda per una capacitat d’anàlisi marxista i d'emancipació feminista que res té a veure amb la propaganda que Occident vol vendre del món àrab i les seves dones.
A powerful exploration of what makes a revolutionary, this autobiography also encouraged a re-examination of the history I’ve learned and the opinions I’ve inherited about certain historical figures.
leila's work details a life lived for her people and a life spent fighting oppression. those critiquing this text and her as a person seem to have no understanding of the realities of settler-colonialism and how an apartheid state functions. i would suggest educating yourself before siding with colonizers- it's a bad look.
no sé què dir sense que soni un cliche, recomanadíssim, com a dona, com a persona a qui li interessa aquell tema com es deia? ah si els drets humans, etc. informatiu, emotiu. m'ha agradat com sempre apel·la a la col·lectivitat com a mitjà i com a objectiu, la simplicitat a l'hora de justificar la lluita armada, la seva capacitat per transmetre passió pertot.
I can’t imagine a better first person narrative of the Palestinian liberation movement. She also helped me understand Palestine in the greater context of Nasserism, Baathism and Pan Arabism. Most importantly she uses the lense of class analysis to understand the liberation struggle.
so incredible. like other radical autobiographies, it was really compelling reading the way Khaled politically grew throughout her early life, and made especially interesting since i'm not as familiar with the political context she grew up in. i knew about the Nakba and Zionism which are of course central, but i didn't know about pan-Arabism, Egyptian president Nasser and 'Nasserism,' and all these other ideologies that also had an impact on Khaled early in life.
she has some very sharp & valuable criticisms of state leadership, celebrity, traditional gender roles, and "revolutionism without ideology" on the left. it was also very interesting to read a bit about how Palestinians continued to organize even as most live in exile, scattered across various lands and hostile governments. her descriptions of her plane hijackings are vivid, stressful, and incredible. there are also long descriptions of her imprisonments post-hijacking that are so brutal to read, but her astonishing strength, intelligence, creativity, and humor somehow shines throughout everything.
in all, an inspiring book where Khaled narrates her growth into an ever-more formidable fighter for liberation from "national, social, sexual, and class oppression."
I love books that give you the intimate and personal experiences and motivations of revolutionary freedom fighters. Leila Khaled’s fiery personality and dedication to the revolution are apparent in her life’s story but she also touches on the geopolitics of the region that either helps or hinders the resistance. Ultimately during this time in her life the Palestinians were much abandoned to their struggle, as best summarized in the concluding chapter:
“Thus the present Arab ruling cliques returned to the positions held by their predecessors on the eve of 1948: Islamic funda-mentalism, class collaboration, anti-communism. It would seem that the Arab ruling classes would rather embrace Zionism, live under the yoke of American imperialism and retard the historic evolution of their societies, than submit to the will of the masses, abdicate power, or let other forces of progress lead the revolution.The petit bourgeoisie of the Arab world has become a spent historic force; it is incapable of coping with such crucial issues as oil, Israel, poverty.”
امرأة اجتمع عليها 4 أصناف من الاضطهاد: التمييز الطبقي، والقهر الاجتماعي، والإبادة العرقية، والتصنيف الجندري.. بينما تعاني أي امرأة غربية ذلك الوقت أقل من ذلك بكثير؛ اشمعنى؟!
لأنها امرأة، ولأنها فلسطينية 🇵🇸
ليلى خالد نموذج للنضال الشعبي الوطني المخلص ضد دخيل محتل دنس الأرض والعرض.
تقرأ هنا: - صورة للنضال الفلسطيني - تحول مواقف عربية من الدعم للتخاذل ثم إلى مقاومة النضال والإجهاز عليه! - موقف القوميين والناصريين داخل فلسطين من الناصرية بعد 67 وبعد بيع جمال للقضية علانية. - تحليل مختصر بعيون فلسطينية لمواقف أميركا والعرب والاتحاد السوفييتي من الاحتلال