Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

The bible as good reading

Rate this book
This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.

This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.

As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.

93 pages, Nook

First published September 27, 2015

Loading...
Loading...

About the author

Albert J. Beveridge

160 books3 followers
Albert Jeremiah Beveridge (October 6, 1862 – April 27, 1927) was an American historian and United States Senator from Indiana. He was an intellectual leader of the Progressive Era, and a biographer of justice John Marshall and President Abraham Lincoln.

(wikipedia)

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
0 (0%)
4 stars
1 (50%)
3 stars
0 (0%)
2 stars
1 (50%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 - 1 of 1 review
Profile Image for Stephen Russell.
140 reviews1 follower
August 17, 2026
Well, it started out really strong but devolved rather quickly. Beveridge is reading the Bible very much through early twentieth-century Western eyes, and so many of the assumptions and tropes of that era come out in the way he interprets the stories he relates.

That made much of the book frustrating, but it was at least interesting for another reason. I have encountered descriptions of this particular way of thinking in several other works, and here I got to see it operating firsthand. In that sense, the book became an interesting artifact of its own time even when I found its treatment of the Bible less convincing.
Displaying 1 - 1 of 1 review