This book earns 3.5 stars rounded down to 3 from me. I just cannot confidently award it 4, but I do think that this book is worth a read for many accounts.
I will open with strengths and then go into growth opportunities. I will also make a case on how I do not think that Ed Wheat is a misogynist, but rather his error in writing this book was not applying biblical marriage roles with balance.
It is due to the title that made me believe that this book would only talk about sex and pleasure within the marriage relationship; one of this book's many strengths is that it delivers above what it promises. Readers get almost a fire hydrant like explosion of wisdom from this book that can be gulped. Ready to learn about STDs from a medical perspective and some Christian sprinkled in? Give chapter x and Y a read (the specific chapters evade me at the moment). Desire a chapter on contraception? Ed Wheat has you covered here as well! Want to learn about having sex still at 80? Yup. There's a chapter for that too! There is a lot in this book and goes well above expectations. Some may call this title misleading. I make it out to be over delivery. Riffraff. All over. Yet, I kind of liked the riffraff?????!?!?! !
Although I just ordered pizza, what I got upon delivery was pizza, salad, bread sticks, and a berry smoothie on the side. This is good, in theory, but there are some rotten nuggets in this book that should be addressed. First, I need to put my opinion on the table about how I do not think Ed Wheat is a mysogonist.
Reviewers on Goodreads have written about how they feel the author is mysogonistic at times in this book. I find myself respectfully disagreeing with this notion. Personally, I disagree that Ed Wheat is a mysogonistic writer; I just don't think that he sat down to write this book with that intention. There is a lot in this book that needs to be understood before we attach the word female hater to this book and the author. Ed Wheat does not hate females. He is also not prejudice against them, at least from what I understood in this book. I don't think Ed Wheat is attempting to harm women with the words in this book. To me, the above 3 sentences all capture what mysognony means. Mysognony, according to Webster's, is defined as the the following: hatred of, aversion to, or prejudice against women. My point is this: it can be easy to utilize terminology that may not be accurate. I do this all the time myself as well. My opinion here may be inaccurate too!
Ed Wheat strongly, strongly, strongly advocates for all married women to achieve orgasm to their maximum. He expects husbands to offer both clitoral and vaginal orgasms to ensure that a wife is always satisfied. Her pleasure, at least from my understanding of this book, is more important than the husbands. To me, this does not show any hate towards women at all. Ed Wheat also offers so much wisdom in this book on how Christian husbands can support and lead their wives to orgasm. His examples are almost too much. How does a medical doctor that has such a strong advocacy for wives to obtain orgasm underscore and support the idea that Ed Wheat is a mysogonistic writer? I don't see it, but, and this is a big BUT, I also think I understand why Ed Wheat got himself into a pickle and flamed for it. It was because of his imbalanced theology application.
Where I do think Ed Wheat does get a bit in a pickle is when he looks at Biblical submission and preaches on it from a male standpoint. I think Ed Wheat took Biblical submission and ran too far with it in this book and didn't offer a balance on how the husband is supposed to respond biblically. I think this is where some readers of this book could make the case that Ed Wheat is somewhat prejudiced against women, and I think here I may somewhat agree. However, I am more inclined to not say it is prejudice, but rather a theological issue that wasn't addressed in the versions of this book. Prejudice, again by Merriam Webster, is defined as the following: "injury or damage resulting from some judgment or action of another in disregard of one's rights." or " preconceived judgment or opinion" or "an adverse opinion or leaning formed without just grounds or before sufficient knowledge." The thing is this: Ed Wheat is using theological grounds to support his opinion of being a biblical wife in this book. His opinion is not baseless; it is grounded in theology. That doesn't necessarily mean that Ed Wheat's theology is sound. I do think there is an imbalance in this book that is not correctly applied for both the husband and wife. You cannot write extensively on how a female needs to submit without balancing the tables. Pastors know that if they preach a sermon all about Biblical submission, then eggs will start to fly from the sitters in the pews (and I would probably be one of those butts tossing a few eggs)! Even me, the soul that sits the pew and tries to learn, knows that a presentation on just biblical submission without talking about the husbands leadership and headship is not going to go over well and make teeth grind. However, this doesn't make what Ed Wheat is saying not true, what it does mean is that Ed Wheat needed to balance his approach; Ed Wheat isn't lying or telling mistruths (at least from my understanding of the Bible); Ed Wheat just doesn't write enough about what a male needs to do biblically and then this is what creates an imbalance, and also leads other readers to strongly assert that Ed Wheat is a mysogonistic writer! . Its a very easy way to get a "mysogony" target painted on the book if a writer just chooses to heavily address Biblical submission. Discussing submission is important, but men also have a roles to carry forth as well, and Ed Wheat needed to articulate this much more in his book.
This is where I minus one star, but also make my case where I do not think that Ed Wheat is a misogynist, but rather, had an imbalanced approach theologically in this book, that resulted in him coming off as a misogynist, but instead, he just needed to discuss more about Biblical headship, and how a husband leads.
The second issue I had with this book was Ed Wheats avoidance of certain topics that actually relate strongly to pleasure and sex in the marriage bed. Ed Wheat only address oral stimulation during the FAQ section of his book, and even offers an unsubstantiated opinion on why oral should not be done in the marriage bed. I am not convinced of this notion and I am not sure if medical data supports it. Ed Wheat provided no medical data. Just his single doctor opinion here. Third, he only writes a few sentences to address pornography, but offers no medical advice or support on how to overcome pornography addiction, discuss it with your spouse, seek wisdom on it, etc etc..
I had a lot of high expectations for this book-- it has been on my reading list for a long, long time. I wanted to read it before I married, but, that just didn't happen (my fault, I know). So I recognize that I am grading this book a bit harsher, because overall, it did let me down a little bit.
This book does overdeliver on topics that may not necessarily relate to pleasure and sex, but it falls flat on its face by under-delivering on its thesis statement. It is not (at least in my opinion) mysognoy, but it does have some imbalanced theology and can definitely make readers feel like egg throwing may be necessary.
Thus stated, this book will help any Christian married couple. I don't think I would suggest this book for anyone else that is not married, because I do think it will tempt couples prior to the marriage bed. There is wisdom here, but this book avoids too many important topics, and does not defend itself well with oral stimulation. It is not balanced with the biblical roles, causing it to lose 1.5 stars, which is rounded down, so a total loss of 2 stars!