Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Believe Not Every Spirit: Possession, Mysticism, & Discernment in Early Modern Catholicism

Rate this book
From 1400 through 1700, the number of reports of demonic possessions among European women was extraordinarily high. During the same period, a new type of mysticism—popular with women—emerged that greatly affected the risk of possession and, as a result, the practice of exorcism. Many feared that in moments of rapture, women, who had surrendered their souls to divine love, were not experiencing the work of angels, but rather the ravages of demons in disguise. So how then, asks Moshe Sluhovsky, were practitioners of exorcism to distinguish demonic from divine possessions?

Drawing on unexplored accounts of mystical schools and spiritual techniques, testimonies of the possessed, and exorcism manuals, Believe Not Every Spirit examines how early modern Europeans dealt with this dilemma. The personal experiences of practitioners, Sluhovsky shows, trumped theological knowledge. Worried that this could lead to a rejection of Catholic rituals, the church reshaped the meaning and practices of exorcism, transforming this healing rite into a means of spiritual interrogation. In its efforts to distinguish between good and evil, the church developed important new explanatory frameworks for the relations between body and soul, interiority and exteriority, and the natural and supernatural.

384 pages, Hardcover

First published May 1, 2007

5 people are currently reading
50 people want to read

About the author

Moshe Sluhovsky

10 books1 follower

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
2 (11%)
4 stars
8 (47%)
3 stars
6 (35%)
2 stars
1 (5%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 of 1 review
Profile Image for Lauren Albert.
1,835 reviews195 followers
October 27, 2014
The book felt a bit repetitive to me. Maybe it would have made a better long journal piece? Sluhovsky's seemed to me to be re-complicating what had been oversimplified. And that's almost always a good thing.
Displaying 1 of 1 review

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.