Waldner's "State Building and Late Development" is a brilliant exploration of the linkages between critical variables in political economy via the comparative economic histories of Korea, Turkey and Syria.
Why does state building sometimes promote economic growth and in other cases impede it? The transformation from a mediated state that governs through social notables to an unmediated state that rules the mass of its subjects directly is a critical juncture in state-building. If inter-elite conflict is high at this juncture, elite elements will seek to mobilize mass support since the winning group will have to forge a cross-class coalition to defeat its rivals, which creates a wholly different political economy and institutional profile than elite unity in shaping state-society-business relations, macroeconomic structure, nature of bureaucracy and how economic interventions are done.
Although it is not what the author aimed for, Waldner kinda wrote the best Turkish EH book ever.
Its Korea and Syria parts are really good too but the depth he reached in Turkey is unprecedented, could say Korea and Syria are the bread to the delicious "Turkey" sandwich between them...
Waldner incorporates a vast amount of literature, basically everything good available at the time of his study, from structuralists to neoliberals. I consider myself well-versed in Turkish EH but still found many referential gems I haven't come across before.
Waldner's work also has special importance for the domestic debates in Turkey for lifting the veil over the political economy of ISI and providing the only book-length direct comparison between Turkey and Korea (which is an unhinged and frequently popped discourse in Turkey, the whole political spectrum blames the rest for blocking Turkey to match the economic successes of Korea)