If the epilogue had been the introduction of this vindictive, gossip-laden book, I would have never picked it up in the first place.
Most readers will hope that the release of this book will bring newly released information on Ana Montes from the FBI, as well as Ana's family, Ana's friends, perhaps even Ana herself -
objective
information that will allow the reader to come to their own conclusion on why Ana did what she did, whether they believe she did it for the right reasons, just how "dangerous" she was, and whether the punishment she received was fair.
Unfortunately, you're getting the complete opposite of an objective, well-balanced story from this (unbelievably) Yale educated journalist. He has a bone to pick with her, which would obviously turn most readers off immediately, because, well... bias.
I really have an excellent review prepared for this utterly ridiculous story which does not deliver on its promises whatsoever (you literally get no real information or quotes from Ana's true friends nor Ana herself) but rather is clearly a vendetta against Montes for criticizing Popkin's Washington Post article on her in 2013 - however, I can't really think straight right now because, well... someone is snoring on the couch where I'm trying to type this and yeah. It's distracting. :(
I promise I'll finish it tomorrow because it's mostly all written out and I have a bit more to say, because it's insane the grudge that Popkin holds against Montes for such a silly reason (when I think he would have done well to have taken the advice she gave on his article and used it for his book).
The further I got into the book, the more I realized I wasn't going to be able to walk away with my own opinion of Ana Montes, as I continued to wonder what in the world Ana had done to this journalist to make his view of her so one-sided, even going so far as to state that on January 8, 2023, Ana is scheduled to walk free - "She will have spent twenty-one years, three months, and nineteen days behind bars. That's a generous reduction of her twenty-five year sentence, nearly four years off for good behavior."
What the hell?! Is he actually insane? Just two chapters prior to mentioning this, he calls the prison she is in "a psychological hell", talks about how many pending lawsuits it has against it for abuse and rape of inmates, explains how only the worst offenders are housed in the unit Ana spent over two decades in. And he believes that over twenty years wasn't quite enough?! No, a "generous reduction" would be like, four years off a seven-year sentence.
Really, don't buy this book and expect to learn anything new. It basically states she spied for Cuba, here's how the investigation played out, she totally betrayed her family (I don't really see how, she just didn't have any relationship with them) - and that the reasons WHY she spied isn't important, but that "illegal is illegal and wrong is wrong." I purchased this book to decide for myself what I thought of Ana and her espionage, not to be given a morality lesson by an author who was clearly angry that Ana critiqued his article ten years ago. I had no idea that illegal and wrong were always so black and white. I was hoping for a bit of gray area, but Popkin makes it pretty clear he sees none.
For God's sake, he even sent a Swedish journalist to harass her former college friend in Sweden (the one that had recruited her as a spy for the Cubans). The friend in question is also now 65, has immunity from prosecution, and has never once been bothered by the press about this - until he sent the reporter in Sweden after her, asking, "If you could say anything to Ana Montes right now, what would you say?!" It seriously sounds like a question you'd hear from a paparazzi hack following a reality star in Los Angeles.
I'm hoping the publication of this book helped to relieve a bit of his anger and bitterness toward Ana, because it honestly reads as obsessed and unhinged. You absolutely should not be an investigative journalist if you're going to have such thin skin - especially when it comes to what your subject says about you. And what she said wasn't even that horrible!
Again, I promise I'll clean this review up tomorrow and make it better. Ugh.