Primitive Man As Philosopher.

by Paul Radin, John Dewey (Foreword)

Classic of anthropology explores belief systems of Winnebago, Oglala Sioux, Maori, Banda, Batak, Tahitian and Hawaiian, Zuni, and Ewe. Fascinating topics include purpose of life, marriage, freedom of thought, death, nature of reality, and other concepts. The author allows his subjects to speak for themselves by quoting extensively from interviews.

Genres: Philosophy, Anthropology, History, Nonfiction, Religion, Folklore, Theory

456 pages, Paperback

First published January 1, 1927

About the author

He was an American cultural anthropologist and folklorist.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Radin

Reviews

[Peter Crofts · Rating 3 out of 5]

A problematic text. Makes all kinds of sweeping generalizations about the modern western worldview and "primitive" cultures. It continually purports to prove various generalizations by reliance on a handful of translated sources from around the globe. I found as I read further in it was less and less convincing, even though some of the arguments are ones I am very partial to. There seems to be more than a bit of axe grinding going on as well, though about precisely what I'm not sure. I find it surprising that this is the work, albeit a relatively early work, of a noted anthropologist.

Perhaps some of the axe grinding is directed towards Social Darwinism since the book was first published in the 1920s. I don't think these days many would argue with the view that neolithic cultures are complicated and possess sophisticated worldviews. I find most any anthropological text I come across completely riveting. This isn't. It's actually rather dull.

[James Murphy · Rating 4 out of 5]

In this book from the 1920s, at the beginnings of anthropology, Paul Radin set out to show that the thought of primitive man is as intellectually sophisticated as that of modern, technologically advanced cultures. Their concerns are the same, I think: the structure of nature, the meaning of life and death, and the meaning of right versus the nature of evil. But primitive explanations are unrefined by comparison. He's right that the 2 groups think alike. It's just that the technologically advanced thought is more cultivated.

I didn't love this. One hundred year old social science is bound to show signs of wear. The book is a valuable and engaging source for examples of folklore across many different cultures.

[Rajiv Chopra · Rating 4 out of 5]

A century is a long passage of time in human terms. Many attitudes change in a century, yet nothing changes at all. In our age of political correctness, we would admonish Paul Radin for using the term ‘primitive man,’ even though it was common in his time. Yet, anyone reading about modern conflicts and how we treat others who differ from us – we ‘other’ them- often use derogatory language when referring to them. Nothing has changed since Paul Radin’s time except the language.
Therefore, I suggest we read Paul Radin’s book through modern eyes, always remembering that those we consider backward have their cultures, philosophy, poems, writing, religious attitudes, etc.
Paul Radin’s book portrays ‘primitive man’ sympathetically and illustrates his thesis systematically. After a few expository pages, he adopts one theme per chapter and illustrates his point with poems, hymns, and tales. ‘Primitive societies’ are astute and have deep connections with nature, a connection modern society has lost. He explored several themes in the book: the relationship of people in these societies with each other, with concepts like death, relationships, religion, nature, etc.
In doing so, he reveals the astonishing sophistication
Many will consider his writing dry and hard to read, but if you persist and read the book patiently, it will reward you and hopefully open your eyes to new perspectives.

[Angel 🦢]

DNF