This book puzzled me for quite a while. The author has chosen to shift the setting to Tasmania, and her knowledge of how the different animals and people live there certainly is interesting. I'd never heard of a quoll before, for example (and neither has spell check apparently). So on one level, it's an interesting "talking animal" book that includes lots of interesting scientific details. However, at the same time, the book is actually written at a very low reading level through much of it. I eventually cottoned on to the idea that Napoli was having Ugly narrate the story at his own level of observation, and as he grows up, his sentence structure does seem to grow more complicated and his world view less childish. However, the down side of this is the first few chapters are remarkably simplistic to the point where it was rather annoying and felt more like a Dick and Jane book at times. It was an interesting choice, and Napoli does love to play with POV if Zel is anything to go by, but it made me think she was aiming for a very young audience. But then there was the level of sheer horrific violence in this. The ducks don't just hate and bully Ugly; they literally try to murder him via drowning in one of the most disturbing scenes in a children's book I think I've ever read. The only reason he doesn't die is they think they've killed him and go away. Even Andersen didn't take it quite that far. His friends have their brains blown out, the Old Woman is planning to eat him, the Husband's children threaten to bake him or pull his teeth out, and on and on. This is grim enough to be, well, Grimm. She actually one-ups Andersen in the bleakness department, though I grant the happy ending is pleasant. I guess in some ways I'm still puzzled by the book, but it will definitely stay with me for a good long while.