What do you think?
Rate this book
Robert Cecil, 1st Earl of Salisbury, 1563-1612: Servant of Two Sovereigns
The first full-length study of the man who contrived the succession of James VI of Scotland to the English throne, following the death of Elizabeth I.
224 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1989
13 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 of 1 review
September 28, 2025
Alan Haynes biography of Robert Cecil is the second to have been written on this important Elizabethan diplomat and eventual secretary of state to James Vi. The first to have been written was done by a member of the cecil family itself and was in the early 1900s and was largely a hagiography.
In Haynes work, he pieces together all that is known of the earl of Salisbury and does a commendable job in doing so, examine his relationship with his father and brother, aswell as Elizabeth herself and eventually James VI. He offers a fairly balanced portrait of the man, but definitely approaches his biography as a pro-cecilian, rarely criticizing Cecil for any of his shortcomings and instead preferring to lavish the word genius, or brilliant on him on several occasions (which could have been warranted).
my only gripe with the book is that while it is a cradle to grave narrative as opposed to a categorical or thematic approach, the writing is definitely dated and the reading could be a bit turgid, and Haynes definitely writes as though you are to know most if not all of the names that Cecil collaborates or works around, which can get to be confusing if you aren't well versed or familiar with them already.
In Haynes work, he pieces together all that is known of the earl of Salisbury and does a commendable job in doing so, examine his relationship with his father and brother, aswell as Elizabeth herself and eventually James VI. He offers a fairly balanced portrait of the man, but definitely approaches his biography as a pro-cecilian, rarely criticizing Cecil for any of his shortcomings and instead preferring to lavish the word genius, or brilliant on him on several occasions (which could have been warranted).
my only gripe with the book is that while it is a cradle to grave narrative as opposed to a categorical or thematic approach, the writing is definitely dated and the reading could be a bit turgid, and Haynes definitely writes as though you are to know most if not all of the names that Cecil collaborates or works around, which can get to be confusing if you aren't well versed or familiar with them already.
Displaying 1 of 1 review