Jewish beliefs clearly trying to work their way into Christian material. Clearly don't believe in and respect Christian intelligence. Absolute no, especially as the state of Israel is dependent on a largely Christian United States military budget. Absolute no to insidiously use the money to hurt Christians. That said, not ok for lack of Christian unity, "I'm the pro-Semitic Christian, unlike blah blah blah". Narcissistic comparative, also an absolute no. Jewish court precedent based traditions trying to take shots at abolition. Absolute 0 comprehension of abolition where you derive the factors that lead to the crime, usually neuroscientific as well as economic first and foremost every time, and then social-cultural or social sickness features that some unconsciousnesses learn and pick up on faster than others the usual suspects. I'm struck also by the striking lack of scientific analysis in old Nazi "character" based eugenics journals about students from different types of classes. There's great record keeping of behavior, but the explanations are just "the dog ate my governance homework" level just saying it's just who they are with literally 0 analysis of the different economic factors, cultures and backgrounds like an actual scientist would do. It blows my mind when someone keeps records that suggest a scientific mind, but then the actual macrosystem analytical work is just "feed the police dog the homework and say it's their fundamental character". They just come off miserable and like bad parents without the oxytocin required. Instead they're just like "NOPE, round em up with 0 intelligence" without even basically chipping at a lasting solution to where that crime came from in the first place. Police dogs eating their governance homework again because it's "too hard" as usual. Just an absolute flunk there. Isn't it funny? Actual, confirmed Nazi material and Jewish anti-abolition material flunk on this point in the exact same way. That is just hilarious. Don't take shots at abolition which is probably as radical Christian as it gets. There's nothing wrong with trying to integrate, but not insidiously and disrespectfully of Christian intelligence. Outside of the disrespect of that, where Face to Face doesn't show disrespect but considers the problems on their own terms without trying to insidiously corrupt them disrespectfully from the inside. That said, this shows very strong comprehension how being as good as your word is critical and that paying in full is an act of courage and commitment which I think is true and we should challenge ourselves to that, within reason of macrosystem competence that requires more forgiveness than not because nobody is intelligent enough to predict and capture all these features and only a narcissist would even attempt to manipulate these huge geosystems without a care to potential irreparable damage. However in the end I'm with Kierkegaard that I think there is an infinite supply of excuses to be a coward and reasons to be brave at any point, ultimately it is the difference between the faithless and the faithful. There will always be an endless supply of material backing either act of faith, in the end it's about your character. Sometimes it's really not possible but that's less often than those weak of will make it sound, and that's on their unattractive character. That shouldn't be enabled, and that shows a strong comprehension of that. However, there are reasons, such as homicide attempts, financial abuse, trafficking, etc., which often have been happening in increasingly faithless increasing religious wars. Even Canada, once the bastion of social medicine that acknowledged war as cancerous (most cancer prone genes have an excessive history of war; war is cancerous, if not cancer itself in the long run) is now easily falling into anger, rage, narcissism and war. That's a real downgrade, and it's concerning, because Nord Stream 2 showed a similar downgrade happening in Germany as well relying on extracting of natural resources and other people's generativity in a parasitic way; both of these were previously considered first world, which is like the adult of economics suddenly downgrading to the teenager of economics. In either case, this material shows a strong comprehension of trust as credit building in being as good as your word. However there is clearly a eugenics element where spirit is being conflated with genes because that's how they experience the world and they don't realize other people are treated very differently and it's not spiritual at all. Not their fault, but they do need to be illuminated. Definitely stank of Jewish crap trying to find a Christian rationalization for trafficking at several points, I have literally heard Zionists say "it's fine to treat Christians however, to make money on them, they're goyem" like they're cattle or something. It's not fine. It's not ok, literally at all. It's just rationalization. For example like "if my friend suddenly forgave all my credit card debt". Was it possible for her to pay for it herself? Nope, that's isolating yourself from God never to be heard from again to pay your own way. Absolute no on cutting a woman off from her community for paying her own way avoiding men who want to potentially traffick her. It's written by a man but it's very incompetent to women's issues how abusers try to work their way in with these kind of things like "gift baskets won't forgive your debt". There are people that will see someone cares, get attracted to them, put them in debt, and essentially commit sexual battery saying it's to get them out of debt just because when they saw how sweet the person was they wanted to and planned an illegal way to have sex with them. This stinks with the rationalization of all that, especially the line that "God decides how you will pay your debt" and it seems that this is from men. This is just straight up gaslighting. Then saying if she pays her own way without men swinging in to pay manufactured legal issues, which is essentially r*pe, then God will cut her off. That just sounds like a trafficker isolating their victim. Stunk really hard of all that, but I think the author was in earnest and someone had been chipping at them at a long time to gaslight them. Not their fault, it's the gaslighter's fault for not respecting their religion and intelligence.