After Paul had spent eighteen months in Corinth, problems in the church there as well as questions from the church prompted Paul to write 1 Corinthians. What happened? Did Paul address these issues while he was there, or were changed circumstances involved? In this book, Dr. Winter proposes that cultural pressures, the Sitz im Leben, in Corinth were a significant contributor to some issues and that changing circumstances such as the establishment of a federal imperial cult in Corinth, the relocation of the Isthmian games to Isthmia and new policies regarding the status of Jews contributed to others.
Before I go any further in my review, I consider it necessary to note that I regret not knowing about this book several years ago when I led a Bible study on 1 Corinthians. My modern American worldview contributed to interpreting certain passages one way when greater awareness of how people thought in a first century Roman colony such as Corinth might have caused me to have somewhat different interpretations.
An example of a cultural pressure that Dr. Winter discusses in the book is the role of patronage and status. Although it may seem surprising to us, one source of conflict between Paul and the Corinthian church was his refusal to accept support from them. The granting of patronage was a type of social contract in which a benefactor gained status by providing financial support and the recipients of such patronage were obligated to advance the causes of the benefactor. Paul was wise to avoid such a can of worms that might cause him to appear to have loyalty other than just to Christ. Furthermore, Dr. Winter suggests that the conflicts Paul addresses in 1 Corinthians are indicative of status conflicts in that culture. For example, a benefactor may claim to operate under the banner of a higher authority, such as a Caesar or a member of the royal family. Dr. Winter interprets the division of the church between Paul, Apollos, Cephas and Christ, rebuked by Paul, as an example of such a status conflict between higher status church members.
The establishment of the federal imperial cult and the relocation of the Isthmian games after Paul’s departure introduced new pressures on the Corinthian church that Paul needed to address by written communication. The federal imperial cult featured an annual event celebrating the reigning emperor’s birthday, and the Isthmian games operated under the aegis of the cult every four years. Both of these events placed strong social pressure on Christians, especially those with higher status, to participate in events featuring pagan worship, including dining in temples and veneration of the emperor.
In the Roman world, the government managed markets, and an effort had been made to accommodate Jewish sensibilities by making meat available that had been processed in accordance with the Law of Moses. Furthermore, the Romans had made another concession to the Jews. As a security measure, private associations were limited to meeting no more than once a month, but synagogues were permitted to meet weekly, consistent with Jewish tradition. Without these rights, weekly meetings would have been considered subversive. When the Jews dragged Paul before proconsul Gallio in Acts 18, they were attempting to remove such concessions from Paul and the Christians, and Gallio’s refusal to act ensured that the Christians retained the protections and rights afforded the Jews. However, following Claudius’ expulsion of the Jews from Rome, Jewish rights experienced a nadir, and the availability of Kosher meat at the market was eliminated. As a result, if Jews or Christians wanted to eat any meat, they had to purchase meat that had been offered to idols, and Paul offered some guidance regarding how to manage this conflict in a way to avoid giving the impression that they honored pagan gods. Then, as now, Christians were faced with apparent no-win situations in their efforts to be lights of the world in their cultural context.
This review barely scratches the surface of Dr. Winter’s book. He is very thorough in his analysis and covers a lot of material. As a result of reading this book, I learned a lot about the interaction of 1 Corinthians and its historical context. But for the fact that the apparent target audience consists of Bible scholars and seminarians, I would highly recommend this book to anyone interested in a better understanding of 1 Corinthians. In his analysis, Dr. Winter draws heavily on Greek writers of that time period, and the book is liberally sprinkled with Greek. Although I am a layman, I taught myself Greek years ago and could follow Dr. Winter’s linguistic analyses. I fear that someone who lacks any background in Greek would get lost and give up without finding the pearls of knowledge scattered throughout the book.