What do you think?
Rate this book


356 pages, Hardcover
First published January 1, 1979
As one might expect from a book by an author born in 1906, much of the characters’ behavior is quite messed up in many ways. I can’t tell you most of them because the effed-up stuff mostly advances the plot but I can say that this book, like many other Victoria Holt novels, contains inappropriate age-gap relationships, multiple acts of r@pe (marital and otherwise) spun to actually be a good thing (WTF Vickeigh??), Asian/Indian people viewed paternalistically / patronizingly, abusive acts by a spouse, and of course, lots and lots of misogyny.
Some of the misogyny comes with the territory of reading books set in the 1800’s but there is a little extra sprinkle of “women as property” and “women are perpetually in need of protection and guidance from men” in this book as compared to other books by Vickeigh.
Is it still entertaining? Yes. Vickeigh is a good writer and will keep you guessing until the very end. However, this book has more clichéd phrases / plot devices than Vickeigh’s other books and I found myself rolling my eyes at the attempts at building drama / suspense because the support for some of the attempts at building anxiety wasn’t there.
For example, the protagonist describes feeling “threatened” by the locals but said locals haven’t done even one thing that was suspicious! Instead of building the suspense, it just comes off as paranoid and ignorant: scared of people just because they come from a different culture.
This is more of an annoyance than a WTF but the kid in the book is six years old but is unable to converse normally with anyone. He is lost in a fantasy world and seems incapable of setting the imaginary aside and living in reality. Like if he were to tag along with his dad for part of the day and when he comes home they want to know when he last ate I fully believe that they would never be able to get that information out of him.
I’m sure this character was intentionally set up this way because his inability to distinguish his memories from his imagination serves as a plot device on a few occasions, but I swear to g0d if I were his mom I would have sent him to bed without dinner (or whatever they did back then) every night until he could learn to answer a simple question with a straight answer!! It’s not endearing like with Anne of Green Gables—it just makes you want to reach into the book and slap every single person there.
Bottom line: not a horrible read. There are better books out there but there are also ones that are a lot worse (Danielle Steele books, for example) so if you can suspend your aggravation this book will hold your attention for a few hours. The twist(ish) ending is still fun.