It's been a few years since I read the last installment, and this one gave me such a different impression from the other two. It feels like it was written by someone else. Now, it could be that memory is hazy. But it would be hard to understand why I would be onto the third book if I felt this way about the previous ones.
I remember the first two being more vivid and tense and better plotted. A Tear in the Sky felt very simply narrated, a series of events that just kind of happen. Even though the plot doesn't jump around -- it's a pretty straightforward affair -- I felt like it skipped over a lot.
For instance, there's a hostage situation that drives the action for much of the book. It's set up as a window into the motivations of the bad guys. But nope, captor and hostage pop up a few times as goalposts, and then there they are at the end. We have no idea what they've been doing, pretty much.
Also, so many hanging threads!
Oh well, hope I like the next one better.