What do you think?


Possible Worlds of Fiction and History: The Postmodern Stage
With Possible Worlds of Fiction and History, Lubomír Doležel reexamines the claim—made first by Roland Barthes and then popularized by Hayden White—that "there is no fundamental distinction between fiction and history."
Doležel rejects this assertion and demonstrates how literary and discourse theory can help the historian to restate the difference between fiction and history. He challenges scholars to reassess the postmodern viewpoint by reintroducing the idea of possible worlds. Possible-worlds semantics reveals that possible worlds of fiction and possible worlds of history differ in their origins, cultural functions, and structural and semantic features. Doležel’s book is the first systematic application of this idea to the theory and philosophy of history.
Possible Worlds of Fiction and History is the crowning work of one of literary theory’s most engaged thinkers.
Doležel rejects this assertion and demonstrates how literary and discourse theory can help the historian to restate the difference between fiction and history. He challenges scholars to reassess the postmodern viewpoint by reintroducing the idea of possible worlds. Possible-worlds semantics reveals that possible worlds of fiction and possible worlds of history differ in their origins, cultural functions, and structural and semantic features. Doležel’s book is the first systematic application of this idea to the theory and philosophy of history.
Possible Worlds of Fiction and History is the crowning work of one of literary theory’s most engaged thinkers.
- GenresNonfiction
184 pages, Hardcover
First published January 1, 1998
About the author
Lubomír Doležel
24 books2 followersLubomír Doležel (b. 1922) is a literary theorist and one of the founders of the "fictional worlds" theory. He received his Ph.D. in Slavic Philology from the Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences. He studied under several members of the Prague School, an influential centre of inter-war structuralist and semiotic thought.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews
July 8, 2021
I’m unimpressed - partly because I disagree, but his big example for historical writing is Schama? Really? Badly done, sir. Very badly done.
December 23, 2024
Comprehensible and useful, aside from that weird chapter fangirling over Shama.
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews



