This book really upset me, but not at all in the way most of those who wrote reviews here were upset by the book.
What upset me was the attitude of 'entitlement' that permeates the entire book. The idea that someone who has an almost perfect life for 30 years, but who then has it a little bit tough for a short period of time is hard done by... just left me really shocked.
It made me wonder if the author has any idea that for a huge percentage of the world's population...well, they would give anything to have had 30 years of such a perfect life; wonderful education, beauty, intelligence, caring family and friends, born into a wealthy country, basic safety and security, a job that pays well and is respected.....
Even with what happened to her, she is still, what, better off and far more lucky than probably 80 - 90% of people around the world!? (She would STILL be one of the luckiest people I know!)
The assumption underlying this book seemed to be that 'rich upper-middle class Americans' (and maybe rich people from other countries??) are owed a perfect life and have a right to feel very hard done by if anything bad ever happens to them.
Was it just me, but was Nat's journey through cancer...ummm, not very brave or amazing at all? I thought she was really selfish and negative and well, it was all very average. Sure she could have coped with it worse, but there was nothing at all remarkable with what she did either. (She was very hard to like I thought, she didn't cope at all well or remarkably.)
There was just no sense of gratitude at ALL for what she has already been given that I could see. That seemed to be what she saw as just her due, never mind that the vast majority of people are nowhere near so lucky. Never mind that some people are far far more ill and that this illness lasts for DECADES at a time.....
I did cry in this book.... I cried with envy at what she could still do and how not-ill she was at the worst of her illness. Like many people with serious chronic illnesses, I would give anything to have even a day being only as 'ill' as she was... On one of her worst days, (which was meant to make you feel so sorry for her) she made some phone calls and left the house.....
Many of us can only DREAM of such luxuries, and it has been YEARS since we experienced them... Many of us could only dream too of getting even 10% of the quality of medical care and support from friends and family she received or being 10% as able to do things as she was. (Sure she has a 50% chance of death, but she also had a 50% chance of having a perfectly normal life! Something many of us have no chance of at all.)
I cried when she was so mad she had to use a wheelchair for a few days too when so many people I know are bedbound/housebound and far too ill to use a wheelchair, but would give anything to HAVE even a few days in one... to leave the house even occasionally.. to see a doctor even occasionally...
I think Nat was lucky. Not brave, not hard done by, not amazing, not at all inspirational, but very, very LUCKY. I wonder does the author know what is happening in the world today? That not everyone in the world is living such a charmed and perfect existence as the wealthy and privelleged characters in this book. If so, why is there not even a short acknowledgement of this? The book seems to assume we are all living such charmed lives... I found this quite offensive and...ignorant.
Yes, not everyone is in my situation... but so many people are dealing with all sort of horrible things all their lives; kids with serious disabilites that they have to care for for decades, being subject to severe abuse and neglect in childhood, having a severe mental illness, having your life put at risk for being gay in the wrong country, living in extreme poverty and fearing your children will die every day, and so on and so on. All much worse than this mild but scary illness...and a charmed first 30 years of life!
If you have had any real problems in life or have a serious chronic illness, do not buy this book, it will likely only upset you as it did me. The writing was fine, quite good even, but the underlying social attitudes etc. left a lot to be desired. Perhaps her future books will be better though!