I first heard about this book in a course on comparative international educational studies last autumn. The name stuck with me and a few weeks ago I happened to come across it at an English-language library here in Quito. I decided to write a short review in order to better retain key information from the book.
The book was written in 1995 and is considered to be a classic dissection of the history of public education reform in the United States. It was written by two heavyweight professors in educational research, David Tyack and Larry Cuban, who seek to explain why public education in the US has always been the target of vehement criticism yet its core practices have endured for more than 150 years.
The authors argue that in the US, public education has historically been seen as one of, if not THE primary solution to societal crises. There has rarely been a time when politicians did not see something amiss in education, some social malady or lingering ineffectiveness requiring swift diagnosis and solution. After public education was first introduced in the early 19th century, religious reformers wanted to change it to produce a body of literate, moral citizens that would transform the United States into God's country. After massive amounts of immigrants from all over the world began arriving to the US in the second half of the 19th century, the millenarian goals of reformers were supplanted by the desire to assimilate people from vastly diverse backgrounds into the political body. Time and again, public education has been painted by worried reformers as a panacea to social anxieties, extending all the way to the landmark Brown vs. Board of Education decision from 1954, which started the desegregation of public schooling in the US, granting Blacks civil rights long overdue. Since then, the pace of reform has only increased, as pressure to limit public spending or improve national competitiveness have served as animus for reform.
Judging from this history, what can we make out as the defining function of US public education? Tyack & Cuban argue that one of the core dialectics in American culture is between the two forces of capitalistic market forces and democratic politics. On one hand, public education is an arena of social competition where youth are selected for adult roles based on performance. Let’s call this the “opportunity function”, predicated on deeply-ingrained cultural notions of the centrality of individual liberty and merit in pursuing the American dream. At the same time, the purpose of public education has also been to expand access to schooling for students from different backgrounds and develop the basis for participatory politics. Let’s call this the “equality function”. Struggles over the future of public schooling have tended to take place between these two opposites.
Tyack & Cuban argue that the reason so many educational reforms have fizzled and faded is because they have been forced on the school by top-down reformers who fail to understand the “grammar of schooling”. Reformers have a tendency to treat schools as clean-slates, ignoring the fact that their institutional cultures are built on layers upon layers of previous reforms and innovations. There is no way to de-couple today’s education from its historical development. The grammar of schooling that is embedded in US public education has been remarkably consistent and continues to define (and delimit) what actually happens in the classroom between teachers and students. Although reforms are meant to change schools, the authors note that schools in fact change reforms. Teachers adopt that which they find useful and look for ways to bury that which fails to contribute to their professional practice. It is for this reason that policy talk around reforms tend to be loud and hyperbolic while policy action and implementation is painstakingly slow, if indeed it even takes place. Tyack & Cuban provide many examples of progress-preaching reformers (and swindlers) proclaiming the Next Big Thing in education, only to find their plans slowly dissipating through the cracks between the floorboards. The teacher and the school have bested many challengers.
Overall, I found that the book struck an excellent balance between the ideals of truth, justice and beauty. It presented a large-scale historical overview of the challenges faced by reformers and also shed light on the particular nature of the US public education system. It also made clear how ideals of justice and equality have historically occupied a central role in public education, despite obvious egregious inequalities and deficiencies. As an educational researcher from Finland focusing on vocational education, I found there to be many identifiable and useful explanations regarding schooling and reforms. The book is well-written and accessible, which I find inspiring, since educational writing tends to be dry and intended for a small audience of researchers. Maybe it’s too easy to take our education system for granted and not engage a broader audience in conversations about the nature and philosophy of schooling. Tyack & Cuban show that this is not only possible but essential.
I highly recommend this book to anyone who wants to better understand why things work the way they do in public education.