Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Psychoanalysis and Cinema: The Play of Shadows

Rate this book
Lebeau examines the long and uneven history of developments in modern art, science, and technology that brought pychoanalysis and the cinema together towards the end of the nineteenth century. She explores the subsequent encounters between the the seductions of psychoanalysis and cinema as converging, though distinct, ways of talking about dream and desire, image and illusion, shock, and sexuality. Beginning with Freud's encounter with the spectacle of hysteria on display in fin-de-siècle Paris, this study offers a detailed reading of the texts and concepts which generated the field of psychoanalytic film theory.

144 pages, Paperback

First published February 15, 2001

2 people are currently reading
59 people want to read

About the author

Vicky Lebeau

5 books

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
4 (13%)
4 stars
9 (31%)
3 stars
13 (44%)
2 stars
2 (6%)
1 star
1 (3%)
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4 reviews
Profile Image for Rebecca Martin.
201 reviews16 followers
January 26, 2013
This book is a useful introduction to Freudian theories that have been so significant in the analysis of film at least since the 1970s. It's a good place to start to learn about the early development of Freud's theories, particularly regarding hysteria. My disappointment comes, though, from the fact that the balance of the book is very much toward psychoanalysis and there is not enough application of those theories to films. The only one that gets any kind of prolonged treatment is The Birds. An entire chapter (of five) is devoted to The Freud Scenario as "one of the most powerful reflections on the origins of psychoanalysis" that "comes through cinema" (61). While the chapter is interesting because of what it reveals about the display of Freudian theory in the "scenario" originally prepared by Sartre for John Huston's Freud (1962) (but not used by the director), it doesn't tell us much about films or how Freudian theory has generally been reflected in a wide range of films in the current and previous century. This is a good example of the imbalance of the book; hence, my dissatisfaction.
Profile Image for Anna.
93 reviews31 followers
February 8, 2017
Very informative but was more focused on the history of psychoanalysis (with a bit cinematic history thrown in at the beginning). While it was still interesting, I found it somewhat lacking as I expected something that was more of how the two worked together (which there was more of in the last two chapters) and less history.
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4 reviews

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.