Definitive study of the strange symbolism through which Blake undertook a literary campaign against the political tyranny of his time. Third edition includes updated material, over 30 illustrations, a Chronology, more. "For our sense of Blake in his own times we are indebted to David Erdman more than anyone else."—Times Literary Supplement. Prefaces. Explanation of Notes. 32 black-and-white illus. Index.
This book constitutes what may be the definitive argument in favor of the thesis that much of William Blake's work had a political purpose and that his symbolism was substantially intended to refer, on the one hand, to events in his own time and, on the other, to historical events archetypically related to them. As such, it is a vital resource for Blake scholars and for readers seriously concerned about authorial intent. As such, it deserves highest regard--five stars in the Goodreads universe.
Sadly, I am neither a Blake scholar nor so well versed in his work as to be able to appreciate author Erdman's detailed arguments. I finished this book with general impressions which will serve to help me read Blake in the future, but the process was tedious and much of the discussion was over my head.
Although an argument, an argument often pointedly opposed to the interpretations of others, the book follows Blake's life and the political history of the period chronologically. This material I could appreciate, learning thereby more about the class struggle of the time and of Blake's association with progressive ideas and movements.
A detailed, nearly line by line contextualizing of the prophetic poems, like the Four Zoas. I couldn’t follow those poems really when I read them, so I learned a lot from this book. Blake flips the script often, angels for devils and vice versa plus characters he meant to be good guys, like Orc, were connected to historical events that didn’t play out happily so sometimes his good guys turn bad. Hunt, the editor who had a lot to do with Byron and Shelley, pops up here to destroy Blake’s exhibition and catalog. There’s some grounds for ‘what if’ type thinking. Most of that boils down to what if Blake had been wealthy like Hunt’s other Romantic poet pals? He might’ve been able to be more public and open about his politics and then Hunt would’ve understood better. I like Blake’s more humble roots, I think it’s part of what lends his work a more inspired, outsider feel compared to other famous British poets and artists of the period. But it’s hard rooting for a guy who isn’t going to get the recognition he deserves until it’s way too late.
One of those works of scholarship that stands out & also stands the test of time. Even though some of the detail of Blake's life is understandably not as expansive as say in a biography like Peter Ackroyd's (the episode where Blake is charged with sedition for example could have done with more detail in relation to the repressive atmosphere of the time),Erdman places the poetry - especially the early "prophecies"- firmly in their historical context.