Jean Baudrillard is one of the most controversial theorists of our time, famous for his claim that the Gulf War never happened and for his provocative writing on terrorism, specifically 9/11. This new and fully updated second edition
an introduction to Baudrillard’s key works and theories such as simulation and hyperreality coverage of Baudrillard’s later work on the question of postmodernism a new chapter on Baudrillard and terrorism engagement with architecture and urbanism through the Utopie group a look at the most recent applications of Baudrillard’s ideas.
Richard J. Lane offers a comprehensive introduction to this complex and fascinating theorist, also examining the impact that Baudrillard has had on literary studies, media and cultural studies, sociology, philosophy and postmodernism.
I think Lane delivers a no-nosense introduction to a mind that many critics think is nothing but nonsense. L. gives the reader a balance of published criticism and praise for Baudrillard and tries to keep enough extracts from the actual text to construct a sturdy contextual next in order to cast as fair a picture as possible. I do have to say, this is not an updated text so you don't get a complete over-arch of JB's timeline, but still a pretty good little book.
This work actually made Baudrillard accessible to me, so I think it's probably a pretty good book (although I have nothing to compare it to, so I'm not 100% sure nothing in it is wrong!). I was completely unable to get into him before, so this is definitely a book that achieves its goal of introducing him to people unfamiliar with him.
I'm not exactly sure how I feel about Baudrillard himself. On one hand I do love the postmodern update to the Frankfurt School thinkers (he seems to be heavily informed by Marcuse in particular); on the other I fundamentally disagree with his ontology of a lost Real and an unsure where to situate the idea of hyperreality if not on a line on progress (or rather anti-progress). it still seems beholden to that which it seeks to critique.
At the end of the day Baudrillard may be more useful as a thinker who generates tools we can use, pick and choose the parts of his theory that are most radical and leave the rest behind. In that case, a general introduction like this is probably the best.
Baudrillard is one of those thinkers that you either love or hate. I lean towards the latter. This introduction still shows most of his ideas in an accessible light. At least, as accessible as you can get with Baudrillard. There is a good diagram of the differences between modernism and postmodernism. Know some Marxism before going in, but overall, I heard there's better introductions to his thought.
I really enjoyed this book. It was fairly easy to understand, and the author clearly explained many of Baudrillard's theories in a very coherent way. I'd recommended this to anyone interested in Baudrillard's works.