In this 85-page book, Rev. Erik Walker Wikstrom argues that by shifting one's mindset, lay leaders in congregations can view what many see as necessary (even mundane) service on church committees as spiritual practice instead. That is, as a way toward personal growth and enrichment.
As he sees it, all committee work is an opportunity to examine and recognize one's own strengths and weaknesses, appreciate the strengths of others, show gentle compassion for the weaknesses of others, and grow in your own ability to put religious community values to work. Like love, patience, and understanding. Along with an appreciation for the fact that, when evaluated together, it's by combining very different abilities and foibles that the best kind of work results. Because each person is playing to their strengths and allowing others to do the work they themselves are not good at. It's a lovely approach.
However, to me, it feels like success would require "buy-in" from everyone. Alternatively, the single person approaching committee work this way will require super-human commitment and patience -- laboring alongside people who still want to do work they may not be good at, who may not share an equal level of commitment to the work, or whose primary goal is NOT this cooperative model of work. So, (again to me) the practical application of what Wikstrom suggests seems extremely difficult to ever attain.
In his defense, Wikstrom likely feels that even a single person adopting this approach and working toward these goals is enough to advance that person's spiritual growth -- regardless of what others do. But I don't see what he is describing as something I personally would be able to maintain. (So, I guess that means I already know a lot about my own limitations.)