Gar O’Donnell is leaving his home in rural Ireland for a new life in Philadelphia. The play, over its three Acts or Episodes, takes place the evening and night before he goes. As we should expect from Brian Friel, the play is largely naturalistic, although with a number of formal adventures. Philadelphia, Here I Come! reminded me of the American coming of age films where the central character leaves their small town to head for college or the big city (e.g., American Graffiti, Lady Bird, etc), but the play doesn’t treat the childhood home and community with nostalgia. The play contains ‘flashbacks’, re-enactments of past occurrences, notably Gar’s failed romance with Kate – he is going forwards because there is little to hold him back. His friends from the pub drop around to say goodbye and it is difficult not to think he is doing well to leave them and their small town mentalities behind. But central to the play is Gar’s relationship with his father. Since the death of his mother Gar has been brought up by his father and Madge, the housekeeper, but Mr O’Donnell is a man who keeps his emotions hidden, moving through his life in a dull routine. I presumed the play was working up to the acknowledgment of emotion, father and son breaking through their reticence, but this doesn’t happen. Gar has a nostalgic childhood memory and I presumed it was going to be the catalyst that allowed the cathartic reconciliation, but when Gar finally mentions it his father has no recollection of the event: we are left to presume it was a projection of Gar’s yearning. And the future isn’t necessarily rosy. In a ‘flashback’ we see Gar meeting his Aunt Lizzy and her American husband: she seems slightly overwhelming in her emotions for her sister’s son. Emotionally Gar is caught between his need to escape and his uncertainty about the future. Friel’s most obvious formal experimentation is that Gar split into two characters: the outer Gar and the inner voice: the character is played by two actors, the inner or Private Gar only being heard or seen by the outer or Public Gar. The Inner Gar voices all the Public Gar’s disdain and bitterness at his surrounding, at his father and at Kate; he comically brags and cynically dismisses others; but it is the Private Gar who expresses the uncertainties and hidden emotions. Is this a successful way to show the way we hide our internal feelings and thoughts, keeping a public front when facing others? I think it succeeds here, but in many ways it is a bit cumbersome: it is probably just as well it didn’t catch on as a general dramatic method.