Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Progress and Poverty: An Economic and Social History of Britain 1700-1850

Rate this book
Previous textbooks on 18th and 19th century Britain have tended to be written either from a social and political standpoint, or about economics in the abstract, as if the history could be reduced to statistical analysis. The aim of this book is to incorporate the revisionist work on British economic growth, which deals impersonally in broad national aggregates, with the work of social and political historians. It stresses the connections between the economy and debates over public policy, and examines the regional variations in agriculture and industry, with particular attention to the differences between England and Scotland. Much revisionist work concerns the operation of assumed national markets; the aim of the book is to show how these markets were formed, and how a national economy was created. The British economy underwent major strucrual change over the period from 1700 to 1850, as population moved from agriculture and rural life to industry and towns.

Martin Danton gives a clear and balanced picture of the continuity and change in the early development of the world's first industrial nation. His book will become prescribed reading for all students of 18th and 19th century British history, and for economists studying the industrial revolution.

638 pages, Paperback

First published August 24, 1995

2 people are currently reading
87 people want to read

About the author

Martin Daunton

22 books12 followers
Martin James Daunton is Professor of Economic History at the University of Cambridge.

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
4 (20%)
4 stars
8 (40%)
3 stars
6 (30%)
2 stars
2 (10%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 of 1 review
Profile Image for Ed.
333 reviews43 followers
April 19, 2019
The most thorough account of the British Industrial and Agricultural Revolutions I have read. Based firmly on geographical specificity it really changed how I saw the process: more gradual, more differentiated, more partial and also throws incredible light on subsequent British economic weakness: the country never really has connected technical education to much of its productive efforts. And the elite have never been that interested in manufacturing. The class system remains an obstacle to prosperity and the talent that goes into non value add activity started back then.
Displaying 1 of 1 review

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.