What do you think?
Rate this book
Shadows of the Crown #4
The Tudor Rose
One woman holds the key to England's most glorious empire in this intimate retelling of the launch of the Tudor dynasty A magnificent portrait of Elizabeth of York, set against the dramatic background of fifteenth century England. Elizabeth, the only living descendant of Edward IV, has the most valuable possession in all of England-a legitimate claim to the crown. Two princes battle to win Britain's most rightful heiress for a bride and her kingdom for his own. On one side is her uncle Richard,the last Plantagenet King, whom she fears is the murderer of her two brothers,the would-be kings. On the other side is Henry Tudor, the exiled knight. Can he save her from a horrifying marriage to a cut-throat soldier? Thrust into the intrigue and drama of the War of the Roses, Elizabeth has a country within her grasp?if she can find the strength to unite a kingdom torn apart by a thirst for power. A richly drawn tale of the woman who launched one of the most dramatic dynasties England has ever seen, The Tudor Rose is a vibrant, imaginative look at the power of a queen.
336 pages, Kindle Edition
First published January 1, 1953
195 people are currently reading
6229 people want to read
About the author
Margaret Campbell Barnes
36 books174 followersMargaret Campbell Wood was born on 17 February 1891 in Rotherfield, Sussex, England, UK. She was the youngest of ten children, who had a happy childhood in the Sussex country side. She was eventually educated at small private schools in Paris and London.
She married Peter Barnes in 1917,( a furniture salesman), and the couple had two sons, Michael and John. Michael, a Royal Armoured Corps Lieutenant, was killed during WW II.
She died on 1 April 1962 in Yarmouth, Isle of Wight.
Her books are historical novels, called Shadows of the Crown, that follow the history of the English Crown. The majority of her books were written between the 1940's and 1950's. Her last and posthumous novel Lady on the Coin was finished by the novelist Hebe Elsna
Over two million copies of Margaret's historical novels have been sold worldwide.
She married Peter Barnes in 1917,( a furniture salesman), and the couple had two sons, Michael and John. Michael, a Royal Armoured Corps Lieutenant, was killed during WW II.
She died on 1 April 1962 in Yarmouth, Isle of Wight.
Her books are historical novels, called Shadows of the Crown, that follow the history of the English Crown. The majority of her books were written between the 1940's and 1950's. Her last and posthumous novel Lady on the Coin was finished by the novelist Hebe Elsna
Over two million copies of Margaret's historical novels have been sold worldwide.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 160 reviews
May 18, 2015
Frankly, I went into this book not expecting to like it. When I got interested in the Tudor books, the owner of our second hand bookstore told me that I should read Margaret Campbell Barnes who she regarded as the best Tudor author. Being a book published in 1953, I expected it to be old fashioned with a lot of over descriptive waffle and wasn't really keen to look for it. However recently a copy came my way and I read it last month.
I really enjoyed it! It was not old fashioned or over descriptive. In fact it had a much more modern feel to it like Philippa Gregory, with less description of every piece of clothing or building, which I found quite refreshing! Our heroine here is Elizabeth of York, oldest daughter of King Edward IV, who becomes a pawn for control of England between Henry Tudor and King Richard III. I loved Elizabeth, who is constantly fearing for the safety of her brothers-The Princes in the Tower, fearing what her uncle Richard III has in store for her and unwilling to marry a rebel from the house of Lancaster. However, when she hears the story of her brothers being murdered, she is determined to join the rebellion on the side of Henry Tudor and bring down Richard III.
The Tudors fascinate me because you could not make up a story as juicy as what they really got up to! The book is full of backstabbing, betrayal, intrigue, murder, dangerous obsessions, plotting, war, rebellion and child murder. Seriously, why wouldn't you want to read it! There is a lot of detail about the wretched life that Elizabeth's family endured in sanctuary while her brothers were sent to the Tower, which a lot of books gloss over. This book also goes into Richard III incestuous interest in his niece and her confused reactions to his interest. What I liked here is that Richard isn't painted as just being a bad guy-he has a lot more depth to him which is explored in his devotion to his wife Anne and their son. Richard has always been a character that fascinated me and part of that was his enduring love for Anne Neville. It was nice to see those flashes of his nature in amongst the story of the murdered Princes. There was some good tension with Elizabeth getting involved in the rebellion plots and a wonderful scene where she becomes convinced of her uncle's guilt.
The second half of the book focuses on Elizabeth's life when she becomes the Queen of King Henry VII, stuck in a loveless relationship with a husband who shows little interest in her. Her children become her solace and you can't help feeling sorry for her. The relationship with Richard would have been incest but it was based on genuine affection and you can see why she thinks back to whether she picked the right side.
The most fascinating part of this book is the arrival of Perkin Warbeck, claiming to be the presumed dead Duke of York, Elizabeth's youngest brother. The story leads us to believe in Henry that the man is a wicked imposter but Elizabeth wants to meet him herself to be convinced that her brother is truly dead. This part of the story was brilliant. The meeting between the two was so well written and I was on the edge of my seat trying to decide if he was an imposter or not! Even when Perkin has been executed, it is not the end of the matter and Elizabeth discovers a few startling things about her husband. I was riveted by this storyline and I loved the way the author chose to end it. In amongst this drama we have her own son Arthur and his ill fated wedding to Catherine of Aragon and his sudden death. How much more drama can you have in one book?
This was an excellent Tudor novel and without doubt it is the best of the War of the Roses era books that I've read. I hardly put the book down in two days and I recommend it to everyone who is fascinated by this period of history.
I really enjoyed it! It was not old fashioned or over descriptive. In fact it had a much more modern feel to it like Philippa Gregory, with less description of every piece of clothing or building, which I found quite refreshing! Our heroine here is Elizabeth of York, oldest daughter of King Edward IV, who becomes a pawn for control of England between Henry Tudor and King Richard III. I loved Elizabeth, who is constantly fearing for the safety of her brothers-The Princes in the Tower, fearing what her uncle Richard III has in store for her and unwilling to marry a rebel from the house of Lancaster. However, when she hears the story of her brothers being murdered, she is determined to join the rebellion on the side of Henry Tudor and bring down Richard III.
The Tudors fascinate me because you could not make up a story as juicy as what they really got up to! The book is full of backstabbing, betrayal, intrigue, murder, dangerous obsessions, plotting, war, rebellion and child murder. Seriously, why wouldn't you want to read it! There is a lot of detail about the wretched life that Elizabeth's family endured in sanctuary while her brothers were sent to the Tower, which a lot of books gloss over. This book also goes into Richard III incestuous interest in his niece and her confused reactions to his interest. What I liked here is that Richard isn't painted as just being a bad guy-he has a lot more depth to him which is explored in his devotion to his wife Anne and their son. Richard has always been a character that fascinated me and part of that was his enduring love for Anne Neville. It was nice to see those flashes of his nature in amongst the story of the murdered Princes. There was some good tension with Elizabeth getting involved in the rebellion plots and a wonderful scene where she becomes convinced of her uncle's guilt.
The second half of the book focuses on Elizabeth's life when she becomes the Queen of King Henry VII, stuck in a loveless relationship with a husband who shows little interest in her. Her children become her solace and you can't help feeling sorry for her. The relationship with Richard would have been incest but it was based on genuine affection and you can see why she thinks back to whether she picked the right side.
The most fascinating part of this book is the arrival of Perkin Warbeck, claiming to be the presumed dead Duke of York, Elizabeth's youngest brother. The story leads us to believe in Henry that the man is a wicked imposter but Elizabeth wants to meet him herself to be convinced that her brother is truly dead. This part of the story was brilliant. The meeting between the two was so well written and I was on the edge of my seat trying to decide if he was an imposter or not! Even when Perkin has been executed, it is not the end of the matter and Elizabeth discovers a few startling things about her husband. I was riveted by this storyline and I loved the way the author chose to end it. In amongst this drama we have her own son Arthur and his ill fated wedding to Catherine of Aragon and his sudden death. How much more drama can you have in one book?
This was an excellent Tudor novel and without doubt it is the best of the War of the Roses era books that I've read. I hardly put the book down in two days and I recommend it to everyone who is fascinated by this period of history.
November 11, 2011
I know I need to try to read books without getting my hackles up about the general hatred of Richard, but REALLY?!?! Where is there any historic evidence he was trying to hook up with his niece? Nowhere, that's where.
January 2, 2012
It takes two to start a dynasty. In regards to the Tudors, it took Henry VII and Elizabeth of York. Sadly, not much is known about (or at least not as discussed) of Elizabeth of York. A young, enigmatic woman with Plantagenet blood in her veins; Elizabeth is a woman of courage and strength. Margaret Campbell Barnes attempts to bring Elizabeth alive in The Tudor Rose. Although it is certainly an attempt; it isn’t a bad one.
The Tudor Rose has somewhat of a slow start. Not the pace of the story per se; but the actual plot itself. This did pick up as the novel progressed but the kick-start didn’t begin until approximately page 40. Although the novel’s claim main character is Elizabeth of York, she hardly appears to have a voice in the beginning events and is weak in her presentation. Margaret Campbell Barnes fails to enclose the reader with Elizabeth’s rapport or insight into her deepest thoughts. Simply, the other characters are much stronger than Elizabeth, leaving something to be desired in her character development. Speaking of characters, Elizabeth’s siblings are portrayed as weaklings and almost immature children while her mother (Elizabeth Woodville) is depicted as the “Wicked Witch of the West” to use a description we know well. The roles are much too stereotypical and lack much depth.
The first few chapters of The Tudor Rose are each from a varying character’s viewpoint of the events during Richard III’s reign (such as the princes in the tower) which lead up to the Battle of Bosworth. This strategy certainly keeps the story fresh but adds to the missing aspect of the novel truly being about Elizabeth of York. However, Elizabeth’s personal emotional debate and struggle regarding her Uncle Richard III’s affections and possible marriage proposal was portrayed with passion and sentiment. Her difficulties with balancing her love for her brothers (possibly murdered in the tower) and her mother and father; while searching for love to replace these empty voids is strong, engaging, and one which many female readers can relate to. Elizabeth’s depth in the novel increased at this point double fold. In fact, as the novel progressed, it became more singularly about Elizabeth, although it still told more of her reactions to events versus an in-depth character study.
The novel would, at times, skip sections and opportunities for value-adding descriptions. Meaning, Barnes would describe an event forthcoming and then skip to its outcome. For example, Elizabeth would be complaining of the lack of her wedding ceremonies to Henry VII and then suddenly the wedding ceremony was taking place in the next sentence. This would temporarily throw off the pace.
On the upside, for the knowledgeable reader, Barnes doesn’t engage in over-tedious descriptions of who characters are and their relations, nor over-analyzes events. This is positive for the reader who knows the topics well, as it increases the pace; but could be confusing for the average reader. Although some of the pages were filled with pure fiction (Elizabeth dressing as a boy, Elizabeth’s pity for heir pretender Lambert Simnel); they are not over-used and the novel is rather historically accurate.
I couldn’t decide whether I was annoyed or enthralled by the storyline of Henry’s loveless (but not hateful) marriage to Elizabeth. Regardless, it made for a dramatic reading. I also didn’t feel on-par with the relationship between Elizabeth and Margaret Beaufort which depicted Beaufort as the “awesome” (so to speak) mother-in-law (when she is usually over-zealous in her piety and overbearing) while Elizabeth viewed her own mother in the novel with pity, annoyance, and some contempt.
As a grammarian, I found annoying faults with Barnes’s extensive habit of beginning sentences with, “And…” This occurred several times throughout and begs for an editor. Another bothersome aspect? Elizabeth used the term, “Wars of the Roses” in her dialogue although this was not used to describe the Lancaster/York battles until the nineteenth century. Not a major issue, but one a history buff will notice.
Although not an in-depth look at Elizabeth of York as the title would suggest; The Tudor Rose is still a solid slice of historical fiction presenting an overview of Elizabeth Woodville, Richard III, the princes in the tower, the heir pretenders, etc. Although I am not usually a fan of older books (The Tudor Rose was published in 1953), I rather enjoyed this one.
The Tudor Rose has somewhat of a slow start. Not the pace of the story per se; but the actual plot itself. This did pick up as the novel progressed but the kick-start didn’t begin until approximately page 40. Although the novel’s claim main character is Elizabeth of York, she hardly appears to have a voice in the beginning events and is weak in her presentation. Margaret Campbell Barnes fails to enclose the reader with Elizabeth’s rapport or insight into her deepest thoughts. Simply, the other characters are much stronger than Elizabeth, leaving something to be desired in her character development. Speaking of characters, Elizabeth’s siblings are portrayed as weaklings and almost immature children while her mother (Elizabeth Woodville) is depicted as the “Wicked Witch of the West” to use a description we know well. The roles are much too stereotypical and lack much depth.
The first few chapters of The Tudor Rose are each from a varying character’s viewpoint of the events during Richard III’s reign (such as the princes in the tower) which lead up to the Battle of Bosworth. This strategy certainly keeps the story fresh but adds to the missing aspect of the novel truly being about Elizabeth of York. However, Elizabeth’s personal emotional debate and struggle regarding her Uncle Richard III’s affections and possible marriage proposal was portrayed with passion and sentiment. Her difficulties with balancing her love for her brothers (possibly murdered in the tower) and her mother and father; while searching for love to replace these empty voids is strong, engaging, and one which many female readers can relate to. Elizabeth’s depth in the novel increased at this point double fold. In fact, as the novel progressed, it became more singularly about Elizabeth, although it still told more of her reactions to events versus an in-depth character study.
The novel would, at times, skip sections and opportunities for value-adding descriptions. Meaning, Barnes would describe an event forthcoming and then skip to its outcome. For example, Elizabeth would be complaining of the lack of her wedding ceremonies to Henry VII and then suddenly the wedding ceremony was taking place in the next sentence. This would temporarily throw off the pace.
On the upside, for the knowledgeable reader, Barnes doesn’t engage in over-tedious descriptions of who characters are and their relations, nor over-analyzes events. This is positive for the reader who knows the topics well, as it increases the pace; but could be confusing for the average reader. Although some of the pages were filled with pure fiction (Elizabeth dressing as a boy, Elizabeth’s pity for heir pretender Lambert Simnel); they are not over-used and the novel is rather historically accurate.
I couldn’t decide whether I was annoyed or enthralled by the storyline of Henry’s loveless (but not hateful) marriage to Elizabeth. Regardless, it made for a dramatic reading. I also didn’t feel on-par with the relationship between Elizabeth and Margaret Beaufort which depicted Beaufort as the “awesome” (so to speak) mother-in-law (when she is usually over-zealous in her piety and overbearing) while Elizabeth viewed her own mother in the novel with pity, annoyance, and some contempt.
As a grammarian, I found annoying faults with Barnes’s extensive habit of beginning sentences with, “And…” This occurred several times throughout and begs for an editor. Another bothersome aspect? Elizabeth used the term, “Wars of the Roses” in her dialogue although this was not used to describe the Lancaster/York battles until the nineteenth century. Not a major issue, but one a history buff will notice.
Although not an in-depth look at Elizabeth of York as the title would suggest; The Tudor Rose is still a solid slice of historical fiction presenting an overview of Elizabeth Woodville, Richard III, the princes in the tower, the heir pretenders, etc. Although I am not usually a fan of older books (The Tudor Rose was published in 1953), I rather enjoyed this one.
November 11, 2013
There are few books about Elizabeth of York, so I was excited to find this one. I thought this might be fluffy, like so many new Tudor books (so imagine my surprise when I got to the end and realized it was originally published in 1953.) That explains a lot. The author covered lots of details and historical moments, but she didn't go into great detail, so knowing the history helps. The only part she made sure to cover completely was The Battle of Bosworth (which was a conversation between Elizabeth and her court after the fact.) The story starts with Elizabeth's marriage preparations to the French Prince, followed by her father's death, her time in sanctuary, Richard's court and her life with Henry. It's all here... Lambert Simnel, Perkin Warbeck and Catherine of Aragon. My only issues were name changes (which the author mentioned in the beginning to help with confusion) but since I know the characters and seeing Henry Stafford called Thomas Stafford kept throwing me off. Also she had the 2nd Duke of Buckingham being old during the Richard III rebellion. I don't believe he was even 30? What I did like was how she wasn't biased over the historical mysteries. She covered both sides. Elizabeth wasn't in love with Richard and naive, but the author covers feelings in a realistic way. It was refreshing to see her always trying to find out the truth about her brothers. I enjoyed that she and Margaret Beaufort were close (not arch enemies) which is trending. Henry VII was not a loving husband, but due to his childhood, emotions had no place. He was a determined King to make England prosper. No romance fluff here.
October 4, 2009
Campbell Barnes begins the story of Elizabeth of York from 1483, when the French King breaks the betrothal contract between Elizabeth and his son Charles. Through Elizabeth's eyes, we see history develop as she takes us through her father, Edward IV's death and its dire consequences. The imprisonment of the two princes in the Tower (Elizabeth's brothers) by Richard of Gloucester's and later when he ceases the crown and becomes Richard III, the attempts on his life and eventual death at the hands of Henry of Richmond. Through it all Elizabeth is a pawn between these two men. Henry VII, the first Tudor King needs her to secure the crown as much as Richard did. She marries him and gives birth to the great Tudor dynasty. The book takes us right before her death.
There were a couple of instances where creative license was taken, but for the most part Campbell Barnes uses known history accurately and beautifully. The writer weaves history and fiction almost seamlessly.I love the way she develops and explores the characters in this book. She specifically explores the duality in their personalities and lets the reader be the judge. Richard III's character is particularly fascinating in his duality and tended to take over the pages. Henry VII's characterization was more subtle although no less effective.
There were a couple of instances where creative license was taken, but for the most part Campbell Barnes uses known history accurately and beautifully. The writer weaves history and fiction almost seamlessly.I love the way she develops and explores the characters in this book. She specifically explores the duality in their personalities and lets the reader be the judge. Richard III's character is particularly fascinating in his duality and tended to take over the pages. Henry VII's characterization was more subtle although no less effective.
January 23, 2011
Elizabeth Plantagenet, daughter of Edward IV was also the sister of the two murdered princes in the
Tower. Although she grieved for them all her life and was very curious about the impostors that turned up to disturb the peace of the first Tudor reign, she gave birth to four children who lived Arthur, who died soon after marrying Katherine Of Aragon, Margaret who was married the the King Of Scots, the future Henry VIII and Mary, who after marrying the aged French King then married for love.
In this book as in all the other books I have read about her, Henry Tudor pays little attention to her.In others, I read she didn't love him. I keep wondering how do they know? Is it because the couple left no love letters or we persist in seeing her state marriage as a loveless one? I do not see how any writer knows what actually went on in privacy between a married couple. They didn't even have the press pursuing them in those days. The first Tudor Queen Elizabeth died in childbed in 1509. The last Tudor Queen, another Elizabeth refused to marry or have children and died in 1603. The throne then went to James IV Of Scotland through her father's sister, Margaret.
This book of course ends long before that with Elizabeth of York's love for her remaining son, who was to become Henry VIII
Tower. Although she grieved for them all her life and was very curious about the impostors that turned up to disturb the peace of the first Tudor reign, she gave birth to four children who lived Arthur, who died soon after marrying Katherine Of Aragon, Margaret who was married the the King Of Scots, the future Henry VIII and Mary, who after marrying the aged French King then married for love.
In this book as in all the other books I have read about her, Henry Tudor pays little attention to her.In others, I read she didn't love him. I keep wondering how do they know? Is it because the couple left no love letters or we persist in seeing her state marriage as a loveless one? I do not see how any writer knows what actually went on in privacy between a married couple. They didn't even have the press pursuing them in those days. The first Tudor Queen Elizabeth died in childbed in 1509. The last Tudor Queen, another Elizabeth refused to marry or have children and died in 1603. The throne then went to James IV Of Scotland through her father's sister, Margaret.
This book of course ends long before that with Elizabeth of York's love for her remaining son, who was to become Henry VIII
June 25, 2013
Possibly the worst book I've ever read? No, that's too harsh. But dull dull dull dull dull. The topic is exciting. The history is exciting. The novel made me want to put my head through the wall. The characters were badly written. The dialogue was badly written. The plot was badly paced. Was there a plot? I fell asleep.
October 2, 2018
The story is well written and historical information well documented. I enjoyed this book and would recommend it as an easy read.
October 11, 2009
I didn't get too excited while I was reading this. Tho based on an interesting woman in Tudor history, Elizabeth of York, the one that literally started a dynasty and gave birth to the scandalous Henry the Eighth, it fell flat. Tho the premise, story, and historical accuracy is all well and good, the writing style is what ruined it for me. Everything is told thru people's convsersations. There is very little actual action. Battles, happenings, scandals, rumors, and major historical details are related to the reader by Elizabeth and another person talking about it, not doing or being there themselves. This being told in third person, I fail to see why it was done this way.
The story begins with Elizabeth in sanctuary with her mother, Elizabeth Woodville, and her siblings. Her father, King Edward, has died and his son, another Edward is to follow him on the throne, but a greedy uncle Richard imprisons both him and Elizabeth's other brother in the tower and takes the throne for himself. The princes, Elizabeth's brothers, disappear, presumed to be murdered by Uncle Richard the king. To top that off, King Richard wants to marry Elizabeth despite the fact that she is his niece. Elizabeth encourages Henry Tudor to take the throne and her hand in marriage. During her marriage and her child bearing, two imposters claim to be one of her dead brothers. Each time, Elizabeth is both hopeful and worried that it may indeed be her dead brother. The novel ends with Henry the Eighth marrying Katharine of Aragon.
The part I enjoyed most was when Elizabeth was plotting against her uncle Richard and dressing as a boy. Unfortuneately, that was a very small part of the book.
The story begins with Elizabeth in sanctuary with her mother, Elizabeth Woodville, and her siblings. Her father, King Edward, has died and his son, another Edward is to follow him on the throne, but a greedy uncle Richard imprisons both him and Elizabeth's other brother in the tower and takes the throne for himself. The princes, Elizabeth's brothers, disappear, presumed to be murdered by Uncle Richard the king. To top that off, King Richard wants to marry Elizabeth despite the fact that she is his niece. Elizabeth encourages Henry Tudor to take the throne and her hand in marriage. During her marriage and her child bearing, two imposters claim to be one of her dead brothers. Each time, Elizabeth is both hopeful and worried that it may indeed be her dead brother. The novel ends with Henry the Eighth marrying Katharine of Aragon.
The part I enjoyed most was when Elizabeth was plotting against her uncle Richard and dressing as a boy. Unfortuneately, that was a very small part of the book.
April 7, 2018
This book was made more enjoyable by being in England while I read it and visiting key locations mentioned throughout. Also tied some aspects of British history together for me.
September 25, 2015
A Tudor Rose, what a delightful book. Ms. Campbell jogs one's memory of history and in a delightful style, she tells the reader of the story of "The Tudor Rose". Of how the War of the Roses, (one white and one red) tore the English country apart. It is the story of an arranged marriage which joined the two houses together to become the house of Tudor. Very sad story, as English history is bloody and the story is of the life of Elizabeth, Queen of England, mother of Henry VIII. The story starts out with Elizabeth as a princess, the death of her father, the grabbing of the throne by her Uncle and the killing of the two young princes in the tower. Then the fight for the crown with the return of Henry VII from France to take the crown, marrying Elizabeth to join together two powerful Royal families. This is a story of many arranged marriages and of power,and betrayal. Lives that are lost, and always the fight for power, and then there are always the pretenders to the throne, trying to usurp whoever happens to be King at the time.
May 29, 2013
This book is awful. I didn't realize when I first picked it up that it's so dated, and maybe that's where some of the awfulness comes from, but still. Awful.
You can write a history textbook, or you can write a novel, but when you try to write both it all just muddles together and neither aspect is very good. Mostly, the characters stand around spouting exposition that reads like 20th century interpretations of 15th century events, or saying things like "Boy, building this dynasty sure is hard work."
There are much, much better nonfiction books about the Wars of the Roses, the Plantagenets and Tudors, the princes killed in the tower, and Perkin Warbeck out there. And I am sure there are much, much better novels about the same.
You can write a history textbook, or you can write a novel, but when you try to write both it all just muddles together and neither aspect is very good. Mostly, the characters stand around spouting exposition that reads like 20th century interpretations of 15th century events, or saying things like "Boy, building this dynasty sure is hard work."
There are much, much better nonfiction books about the Wars of the Roses, the Plantagenets and Tudors, the princes killed in the tower, and Perkin Warbeck out there. And I am sure there are much, much better novels about the same.
September 12, 2010
So this is my interpretation of Elizabeth's obvious character change after reading this book...That marriage to an unloving and business-minded man like Henry squashed her Plantagenent spirit slowly and simply over the years. Eventually she accepted the kind of woman and queen she needed to be for Henry, and became that person, as her personal sacrifice for the peace and prosperity of her country. But I think she always held a glimmer of hope that things might change between her and Henry, and only after the death of her son Arthur and Henry's quick distraction from grief by thoughts of losing Katherine's dowry, did Elizabeth finally accept that her hope was all in vain.
February 11, 2016
This is one of the areas of history I love to read books around. Margaret weaves a fantastic story around a very turbulent point in English History. All the characters were compelling and a joy to read. I would recommend to anyone who enjoys books around the Plantagenet's and the Tudor's. Elizabeth of York is a compelling character to create a story around as so much dramatic change happened in her life of which she is often at the centre. Margaret creates a relatable and likable version of her that had me eagerly reading to see where she would end in Elizabeth's story.
October 21, 2018
I was looking forward to this book, but I came away disappointed. There are several other more recently written fiction and non-fiction that are much better. With the recent research that has been done, it shows the HenryVII and Elizabeth had a loving relationship. Yes, Henry was very involved in the "business" of running of the counrty, but after 30 years of war this had to be important. I would recommend other books for more historical accuracy.
July 3, 2009
This is the new Sourcebooks edition due out in September 2009. Once again, you'll find my reading guide in the back. While still in the vein of Tudor-related topics, this takes us away from the focus of Henry VIII and his myriad wives, with an intimate and compassionate look at his mother. MCB is at the top of her game yet again!
February 24, 2012
This is the fictionalized story of Elizabeth of York, wife of Henry VII and mother of Henry VIII.
I didn't find this book to be very exciting; a lot happened around Elizabeth but she wasn't really part of most of it. Not too much action, and the story is almost all dialogue. It's an "ok" book but not a great one. I felt at times as if I were reading a play and not a novel.
I didn't find this book to be very exciting; a lot happened around Elizabeth but she wasn't really part of most of it. Not too much action, and the story is almost all dialogue. It's an "ok" book but not a great one. I felt at times as if I were reading a play and not a novel.
October 22, 2012
excellent fictionalized story of the War of the Roses and tge parents of Henry XIII. .... page turner
August 13, 2013
I have now read three books on Elizabeth of York, all different. Makes you wonder! None of the authors allowed truth to get in the way of a good story.
July 1, 2012
A good read that kept me moving but very predictable. I felt I could predict the next storyline.
February 8, 2019
The beginning of the Tudor Dynasty was full of action and drama. Richard III and Henry Tudor met on the battlefield at Bosworth on August 22, 1485 to determine who would be the King of England. Richard III fell and Henry Tudor triumph, becoming Henry VII. However, there was another person whose fate was determined on that battlefield; Elizabeth of York, daughter of Edward IV and Elizabeth Woodville. It was at this battle that Elizabeth knew that she would marry Henry Tudor and become queen of England. But what was it like for her to live through this time of change? From the death of her father to the case of her missing brothers. From to Richard III’s short reign to her relationship with her husband Henry VII and her children. How did she feel during the most difficult times in her life? Margaret Campbell Barnes explores this question in her novel, “The Tudor Rose”.
“The Tudor Rose” starts off in the middle of Elizabeth of York’s childhood when the French decided to back away from the marriage arrangement between her and the Dauphin. Elizabeth, clearly distress, goes to his loving father Edward IV for comfort. When Edward IV died, we see how Elizabeth and her family reacted. It is Barnes theory that the family was quite close, especially Elizabeth and her younger brother Richard. Elizabeth’s brother is made Edward V and both boys are placed in the Tower of London for their protection by their uncle Richard Duke of Gloucester. Barnes writes Richard as a villain, similar to the way Shakespeare described him, and it feels as though Elizabeth is disgusted by him. Its Elizabeth’s mother Elizabeth Woodville who decides to get back at Richard by arranging a marriage between Elizabeth and the son of Margaret Beaufort, the future Henry VII.
After Bosworth, Henry is made king and marries Elizabeth of York. Even though Elizabeth was from the York and Henry was a Lancastrian supporter, history books tell us that they loved each other. Barnes takes a different approach to their relationship. She writes Henry as a miserly king who never had real feelings towards Elizabeth. Elizabeth, according to Barnes, had more love towards her children than she did towards husband. It’s a darker look at Henry VII, but one that is not uncommon in literature.
A common theme during Henry VII’s reign was the constant threat of people who pretended to be Elizabeth of York’s brothers. Elizabeth is not known to have met with any of the pretenders, but in this book, Elizabeth met with both Lambert Simnel and Perkin Warbeck. The interactions are quite unique and makes the reader wonder if Warbeck especially could have been one of Elizabeth’s long lost brothers. Barnes explains the importance of these pretenders to both Henry and Elizabeth:
It was like a cloud above the Tudors’ lives. At first it had been just something which they joked about. But gradually, as the years went on and more and yet more people believed -or, for their own ends, pretended to believe- that a son of Edward’s still lived, it began to darken their world- and perhaps even to cloud their own certainty. Because it affected them both it brought Henry and Elizabeth closer together. But it affected them differently. To Henry, with his poor claim to the throne, the whole affair stood for affront and fear; whereas to Elizabeth- although it brought fear for her family- it never really ceased to hold a shining element of hope. A hope which she wore herself out trying to extinguish, knowing it for the crazy thing it was. (Barnes, 236).
I had read this book before I really started researching the Wars of the Roses and I really enjoyed the interactions between Elizabeth and her family. This was probably the first book that I read about Elizabeth of York that I really enjoyed and it was the book that got me interested in researching her life. Its been a few years since I have read this book and now that I have done a little research on Elizabeth of York’s life, I found myself questioning how certain characters were portrayed. If you want a book to help you get into the Wars of the Roses and the life of Elizabeth of York, I would recommend “The Tudor Rose” by Margaret Campbell Barnes. It gives a different perspective on the life of Elizabeth of York, the first Tudor queen.
“The Tudor Rose” starts off in the middle of Elizabeth of York’s childhood when the French decided to back away from the marriage arrangement between her and the Dauphin. Elizabeth, clearly distress, goes to his loving father Edward IV for comfort. When Edward IV died, we see how Elizabeth and her family reacted. It is Barnes theory that the family was quite close, especially Elizabeth and her younger brother Richard. Elizabeth’s brother is made Edward V and both boys are placed in the Tower of London for their protection by their uncle Richard Duke of Gloucester. Barnes writes Richard as a villain, similar to the way Shakespeare described him, and it feels as though Elizabeth is disgusted by him. Its Elizabeth’s mother Elizabeth Woodville who decides to get back at Richard by arranging a marriage between Elizabeth and the son of Margaret Beaufort, the future Henry VII.
After Bosworth, Henry is made king and marries Elizabeth of York. Even though Elizabeth was from the York and Henry was a Lancastrian supporter, history books tell us that they loved each other. Barnes takes a different approach to their relationship. She writes Henry as a miserly king who never had real feelings towards Elizabeth. Elizabeth, according to Barnes, had more love towards her children than she did towards husband. It’s a darker look at Henry VII, but one that is not uncommon in literature.
A common theme during Henry VII’s reign was the constant threat of people who pretended to be Elizabeth of York’s brothers. Elizabeth is not known to have met with any of the pretenders, but in this book, Elizabeth met with both Lambert Simnel and Perkin Warbeck. The interactions are quite unique and makes the reader wonder if Warbeck especially could have been one of Elizabeth’s long lost brothers. Barnes explains the importance of these pretenders to both Henry and Elizabeth:
It was like a cloud above the Tudors’ lives. At first it had been just something which they joked about. But gradually, as the years went on and more and yet more people believed -or, for their own ends, pretended to believe- that a son of Edward’s still lived, it began to darken their world- and perhaps even to cloud their own certainty. Because it affected them both it brought Henry and Elizabeth closer together. But it affected them differently. To Henry, with his poor claim to the throne, the whole affair stood for affront and fear; whereas to Elizabeth- although it brought fear for her family- it never really ceased to hold a shining element of hope. A hope which she wore herself out trying to extinguish, knowing it for the crazy thing it was. (Barnes, 236).
I had read this book before I really started researching the Wars of the Roses and I really enjoyed the interactions between Elizabeth and her family. This was probably the first book that I read about Elizabeth of York that I really enjoyed and it was the book that got me interested in researching her life. Its been a few years since I have read this book and now that I have done a little research on Elizabeth of York’s life, I found myself questioning how certain characters were portrayed. If you want a book to help you get into the Wars of the Roses and the life of Elizabeth of York, I would recommend “The Tudor Rose” by Margaret Campbell Barnes. It gives a different perspective on the life of Elizabeth of York, the first Tudor queen.
July 16, 2017
Tudor Rose follows the tumultuous events of the life of Elizabeth of York, one of the Plantagenet and the rightful heir to the throne after her father dies and her uncle Richard has her two brothers murdered. Once a young girl with high hopes of being married off to French royalty, dreams that are never realized as the nature of political alliance complicates happiness, Elizabeth (Bess) is thrown into drama and intrigue when, just as her young brother Edward is to be crowned King, he is sent to the Tower of London. Not soon after, so too is her brother Richard. With both sons out of the way, presumed and then verified dead, her father's brother, the noble Richard rises to the thrown. She is caught in the middle of an uncle she fears is a murderer and may soon either murder or wish to marry her, and a political alliance with one of the Tudor family in exile. In a plot to rid herself of her uncle, she promises young Henry that she will marry him and give him the crown if he kills her uncle. Yet it is no happily ever after for them as Elizabeth soon finds that their marriage will not be one of love. After a lifetime of disappointment and fear, she must now endure a husband who is not only ambitious, but entirely awkward at ways of love. His brand of affection is vexing for her indeed. Feeling unloved, Elizabeth must find reasons and things within her life to bring her pleasure. And, as she hopes, to make the husband she gave her crown and the power over all of England to love her finally. Amidst disappointment, fear, and grief, the two of them I very much enjoyed Tudor Rose, as it is one of my first forays into the realm of Tudor fiction, which is apparently all the rage. Not knowing much about the time period or the family itself, I cannot attest to the historical accuracy of the novel besides saying that the author has taken great pains to bring life and complexity into each and every character. Whether the personalities are true to the people, I liked that each and every one was distinct and evolving, not superficial. Though of course the "everyone loves Bess, she's perfect and no one can resist her charms and adores her" was a little bit annoying. It took it to that "romance novel" level of perfect lead female characters that I just cannot stand. She was your typical tragic female character who is perfect despite all and suffers through misfortune that only makes her ever more adored by those around her. Not my type of character. I was also a bit put off by how quickly certain events moved. It seemed throughout the novel that the author was setting us up for something big and climactic, but then it would all come to an end in the beginning of the first chapter with a few sentences to explain it was taken care of. It felt rather disappointing to be set up for so much drama, only to not get to witness it being played out. This was more common in the beginning on the novel, which I suppose is understandable because to cover everything would have made the book of considerable length. There was enough to fill up the pages, and not everything was brushed over anti-climactic.
May 21, 2018
As most anyone who knows me knows, I’m a student of history. My primary interest is in American History, but I’ve always had a great admiration for Queen Elizabeth I of England. That was the reason that I chose this historical fiction novel initially because with the title The Rose of Tudor and reading the synopsis on the dust jacket, I naturally assumed it was about Elizabeth I. Although, it is in fact, based on the life of her grandmother, Elizabeth of York, it is no less fascinating. Elizabeth of York, like her granddaughter after her is a strong woman with a fierce love of her family and country. The novel chronicles Elizabeth’s life from the time she is a young girl of 17 until just before her death.
At 17, the beautiful young princess Elizabeth is engaged to be married to the Dauphin of France. The novel opens with her trying on her wedding finery, but then her father tells her that the French have changed their mind. It is the first of many tragic losses that Elizabeth will overcome in her life. Shortly, thereafter, her father dies, plunging the futures of Elizabeth and her siblings into question. Her eldest brother and rightful heir to the throne, Edward, is away at school and her mother sends some of her relatives to fetch him home to London. On their way they are intercepted by Elizabeth’s uncle and brother of her late father, Richard. Under the guise of being the Lord Protectorate of the young king, Richard usurps the throne for himself. Shortly thereafter, both young princes disappear from the Tower, and are feared murdered.
Elizabeth has history thrust upon her as she must decide whether to be a loyal Yorkist and support her uncle or whether she will defy him and pledge herself as wife to Henry Tudor, of the Lancastrian line if he will return to England from his exile and defeat her uncle. The choice she makes will affect the history of England the lives of all her people. She alone can end the civil wars that have plagued her nation for years. She can forge a new union between the Yorkist and Lancastrian factions that have been battling to rule the nation. She can forge the white rose and the red rose into a new Tudor rose, so that The War of the Roses is no more. Elizabeth faces up to the decision with poise and courage, and continues to do so throughout her life as she raises her family and does her best to care for her people.
I really enjoyed this novel and would encourage all my fellow lovers of history to give it a read to because Elizabeth of York is every bit as intriguing, courageous, and strong figure as her namesake granddaughter, and the times in which she lived are filled with all the strivings for power and passions of the heart that have kept readers hooked for centuries.
At 17, the beautiful young princess Elizabeth is engaged to be married to the Dauphin of France. The novel opens with her trying on her wedding finery, but then her father tells her that the French have changed their mind. It is the first of many tragic losses that Elizabeth will overcome in her life. Shortly, thereafter, her father dies, plunging the futures of Elizabeth and her siblings into question. Her eldest brother and rightful heir to the throne, Edward, is away at school and her mother sends some of her relatives to fetch him home to London. On their way they are intercepted by Elizabeth’s uncle and brother of her late father, Richard. Under the guise of being the Lord Protectorate of the young king, Richard usurps the throne for himself. Shortly thereafter, both young princes disappear from the Tower, and are feared murdered.
Elizabeth has history thrust upon her as she must decide whether to be a loyal Yorkist and support her uncle or whether she will defy him and pledge herself as wife to Henry Tudor, of the Lancastrian line if he will return to England from his exile and defeat her uncle. The choice she makes will affect the history of England the lives of all her people. She alone can end the civil wars that have plagued her nation for years. She can forge a new union between the Yorkist and Lancastrian factions that have been battling to rule the nation. She can forge the white rose and the red rose into a new Tudor rose, so that The War of the Roses is no more. Elizabeth faces up to the decision with poise and courage, and continues to do so throughout her life as she raises her family and does her best to care for her people.
I really enjoyed this novel and would encourage all my fellow lovers of history to give it a read to because Elizabeth of York is every bit as intriguing, courageous, and strong figure as her namesake granddaughter, and the times in which she lived are filled with all the strivings for power and passions of the heart that have kept readers hooked for centuries.
January 5, 2025
The first Tudor queen tends to be overshadowed by the drama of her descendents, but she lived quite a wild life herself. Though this is a work of fiction, Barnes had clearly studied her history - though the reader must keep in mind the publication year. Our understanding of the Tudor period has evolved since the 1950s, so some of the character depictions are jarring (Margaret Beaufort and Elizabeth Woodville in particular were painful to read at parts.)
Following Elizabeth of York from childhood to just before her death does not lead to a long book, but there's plenty to deal with. I found her early life the most interesting part. Even knowing how the story goes, Barnes was able to maintain the tension; Elizabeth's swinging emotions as she struggles to reconcile her childhood safety with the realities of court as a young adult feel real and believable.
But honesty, the best character in the book is Richard III. Barnes fleshes him out from his usual flatly evil characterization. The loving uncle and the ruthless soldier are equally true and the way he changes with circumstances feels natural. Elizabeth is at her best when she has him to react to.
Once Henry Tudor shows up, the pace of the book slows and Elizabeth loses most of her spark. It is interesting that Barnes gave them such an antagonistic relationship. Most Tudor works call them a love match, but this polite ambivalence feels more right for these characters - especially as this Elizabeth is so proud of her place as her father's eldest daughter. Unfortunately, Henry Tudor doesn't get the focus the Plantangents received early in the book, so he remains a cipher to both Elizabeth and the reader.
My other complaint is that once Elizabeth is crowned, Barnes skips over multiple years at a time. The early years feel real and interesting that is lost in the second half of the book. I understand from a historical point of view we don't have much of what Elizabeth was doing, but this is fiction. Even just seeing more interactions with the court would have helped flesh everything out and let Elizabeth continue to shine as a main character.
Following Elizabeth of York from childhood to just before her death does not lead to a long book, but there's plenty to deal with. I found her early life the most interesting part. Even knowing how the story goes, Barnes was able to maintain the tension; Elizabeth's swinging emotions as she struggles to reconcile her childhood safety with the realities of court as a young adult feel real and believable.
But honesty, the best character in the book is Richard III. Barnes fleshes him out from his usual flatly evil characterization. The loving uncle and the ruthless soldier are equally true and the way he changes with circumstances feels natural. Elizabeth is at her best when she has him to react to.
Once Henry Tudor shows up, the pace of the book slows and Elizabeth loses most of her spark. It is interesting that Barnes gave them such an antagonistic relationship. Most Tudor works call them a love match, but this polite ambivalence feels more right for these characters - especially as this Elizabeth is so proud of her place as her father's eldest daughter. Unfortunately, Henry Tudor doesn't get the focus the Plantangents received early in the book, so he remains a cipher to both Elizabeth and the reader.
My other complaint is that once Elizabeth is crowned, Barnes skips over multiple years at a time. The early years feel real and interesting that is lost in the second half of the book. I understand from a historical point of view we don't have much of what Elizabeth was doing, but this is fiction. Even just seeing more interactions with the court would have helped flesh everything out and let Elizabeth continue to shine as a main character.
March 5, 2021
Here we have the story of Elizabeth of York, who to her lineage was an eyewitness to a lot of interesting English history, as she saw the end of the Plantagenet dynasty and the beginning of the Tudor dynasty. She is the daughter of Edward the IV and Elizabeth Woodville, the older sister of the mysteriously disappeared 'Princes in the Tower", wife of Henry VII and mother of Henry VIII.
Unfortunately, Elizabeth of York isn't really an interesting historical figure. I personally think we are all tricked into believing she's interesting because of her family and the times that she lived in. In actuality, Elizabeth of York was not involved in politics and didn't stray too far from the Medieval duties of a Queen (meaning she was pious and had many children). This is all to say, I found the story dull. She is a very passive figure with events always occurring around her. The few instances when Elizabeth manages to take direct action are exciting and interesting but, unfortunately, do not last long.
Additionally, I can't help but compare this book with Phillipa Gregory's The White Princess, which is also about Elizabeth of York and thus, follows similar events. The Tudor Rose is an older book with slight historical inaccuracies (which I can forgive since this came out in the 1950s and scholarship and thinking have changed in the nearly 70 years since this book came out). The White Princess has a pulpy style to it (Gregory loves her historical rumors). I would say I liked The Tudor Rose slightly better, but both are dull due to Elizabeth of York's passivity.
So moral of the story: make sure the medieval woman you are reading about had been involved in some sort of foreign dispute, political backstabbing, rebellion, or court scandal because otherwise, you are in for a dull ride.
Unfortunately, Elizabeth of York isn't really an interesting historical figure. I personally think we are all tricked into believing she's interesting because of her family and the times that she lived in. In actuality, Elizabeth of York was not involved in politics and didn't stray too far from the Medieval duties of a Queen (meaning she was pious and had many children). This is all to say, I found the story dull. She is a very passive figure with events always occurring around her. The few instances when Elizabeth manages to take direct action are exciting and interesting but, unfortunately, do not last long.
Additionally, I can't help but compare this book with Phillipa Gregory's The White Princess, which is also about Elizabeth of York and thus, follows similar events. The Tudor Rose is an older book with slight historical inaccuracies (which I can forgive since this came out in the 1950s and scholarship and thinking have changed in the nearly 70 years since this book came out). The White Princess has a pulpy style to it (Gregory loves her historical rumors). I would say I liked The Tudor Rose slightly better, but both are dull due to Elizabeth of York's passivity.
So moral of the story: make sure the medieval woman you are reading about had been involved in some sort of foreign dispute, political backstabbing, rebellion, or court scandal because otherwise, you are in for a dull ride.
March 26, 2017
The story of how Princess Elizabeth of York became the wife of Henry of Lancaster. Elizabeth, Bess, was the eldest daughter of Henry VI and sister to the princes who were imprisoned in the Tower by their uncle Richard after the death of Henry. Bess is haunted by their disappearance her entire life. Because their bodies were never found, she never knows for sure whether one or both could have escaped. When Richard proposes marriage to her, she turns to her aunt Margaret who wants her to marry her son Henry, who is in exile in France. When Henry arrives and conquers Richard, Bess is hoping that Henry will be her knight in shining armor. He is crowned on the battlefield. She is returned to London, but it is two years before he gets around to marrying her, and another two years before she is crowned. She has the better pedigree, and the people have always loved her, so marrying her will improve his popularity. But it is clear that Henry VII is cold and businesslike in EVERYTHING he does. Bess is nothing more than a brood mare as far as he is concerned. He mentions the cost of things at every turn. She has a strict household allowance. In one scene one of her maids-in-waiting wants her to get silver buckles for her shoes in stead of tin, which she declines. Their reign is plagued by pretenders, men posing usually as the younger of the princes from the tower. The last one, Perkin Warbeck, nearly had Bess convinced. But acknowledging him would mean taking away the future of her own son. The book is an interesting retelling of history mainly from Elizabeth's point of view. Barnes clears up some of my confusion of the players in the end of the War of the Roses.
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
August 4, 2020
The Tudor Rose is a wonderful story of the life of Elizabeth of York told as if by her. In this book the author presents Elizabeth as having more of a feisty personality than history often gives her. The author also has Elizabeth having had romantic feelings for a man by the name of Tom Stafford and her Uncle Richard. Throughout the story Elizabeth is trying to come to terms with what happened to her brothers in the Tower, especially Richard or as Elizabeth calls him "Dickon." Elizabeth eventually realizes her uncle Richard has had them murdered and only then does she understand that she must play an important role in the future as the wife of Henry Tudor. While she would have liked to have found love she knows her stronger claim to the throne will heal the years of bloodshed in uniting the red and the white roses. She finds contentment if not happiness as a wife but is then plagued by the pretenders to the throne though she tries to adopt the view of her mother that they are just two of her father's many bastards. But Perkin Warbeck causes her to really wonder....could he be Dickon?
May 24, 2021
What a lovely fantasy story. One always has to remember that with Historical Fiction, that the author is allowed to take some free license with how they see the characters. Honestly I don't know that about one of the first great Elizabeth (Elizabeth of York) mother to King Henry the 8th.
There are many rumours about Elizabeth of York, did she sleep with her Uncle (who "murdered" the Princes). All of which are more than likely false. She does though both in reality and in fiction, a very kind women and a kind Queen.
Neither Elizabeth of York or her husband, King Henry the 7th would live to see the monster that their son King Henry the 8th became. It seems though that both of them were heart broken by the death of their elder son, Arthur. Elizabeth of York because pregnant again after his death, but died due to a post partum infection.
She's seems to have quiet a priviliged life when you really think about it, especially for then. Apart from her brothers being more than likely murdered, which I'm sure affected her throughout the rest of her life. She seems to really have had a lucky life.
There are many rumours about Elizabeth of York, did she sleep with her Uncle (who "murdered" the Princes). All of which are more than likely false. She does though both in reality and in fiction, a very kind women and a kind Queen.
Neither Elizabeth of York or her husband, King Henry the 7th would live to see the monster that their son King Henry the 8th became. It seems though that both of them were heart broken by the death of their elder son, Arthur. Elizabeth of York because pregnant again after his death, but died due to a post partum infection.
She's seems to have quiet a priviliged life when you really think about it, especially for then. Apart from her brothers being more than likely murdered, which I'm sure affected her throughout the rest of her life. She seems to really have had a lucky life.
February 19, 2019
I read this, and the other books by Margaret Campbell Barnes, while I was still in High School. You could say that I devoured them and enjoyed them. A couple decades later I ran across this. Apart from the inaccurate cover, which is out of period for this early Tudor novel (and I do wish they would stop the 'headless women on cover' fad) the book brought back good memories. I bought a copy and sat back to reread.
Barnes wrote well and colorfully. This is historical fiction, so should not be consulted as a source book. With that understood, The Tudor Rose tells a good tale that can keep you interested. It contains an interesting twist at the end, and Ricardians and Henry-ians (if that's the term) would both be either annoyed or satisfied by the way that Mrs. Barnes never actually tells who was responsible for the deaths of the princes in the Tower. If they both died.
I'd give this book to anyone from Junior High school (say, age 12 through 17). It might whet the reader's appetite for the history of that fascinating time.
Barnes wrote well and colorfully. This is historical fiction, so should not be consulted as a source book. With that understood, The Tudor Rose tells a good tale that can keep you interested. It contains an interesting twist at the end, and Ricardians and Henry-ians (if that's the term) would both be either annoyed or satisfied by the way that Mrs. Barnes never actually tells who was responsible for the deaths of the princes in the Tower. If they both died.
I'd give this book to anyone from Junior High school (say, age 12 through 17). It might whet the reader's appetite for the history of that fascinating time.
November 11, 2023
I am not an English citizen and therefore knew very little of the history of English royalty. The novels of Margaret Campbell Barnes have opened this subject a lot for me, particular this one. And I found it very pleasant and entertaining to learn about these things in this way, as it is told so lively and full of character. Most events were new to me (such as the asylum in the abbey, the princes in the tower, the throne pretendents), so to me, when these events were told, accompanied by people's emotions, conversations and activities, it seemed to me they were unfolding in real-time. It's as if every day, you hear the news about the next thing that happened, and you engage in it.
I am just assuming that everything about events and people's characters that can be verified, was verified, and is historically accurate. For the rest, Margaret Campbell Barnes wonderfully fills in the gaps, to make a very colourful story which tells us in a lively way how the events may well have exactly happened.
I am just assuming that everything about events and people's characters that can be verified, was verified, and is historically accurate. For the rest, Margaret Campbell Barnes wonderfully fills in the gaps, to make a very colourful story which tells us in a lively way how the events may well have exactly happened.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 160 reviews