The purpose of this book is to broadly trace the pagan, Jewish and Christian sources of ascetic theory and practice up through the mid-fifth century CE. In so doing, the reader is made aware of how various and radically contextualized such self-disciplinary practices were. Thus, while a Cynic might engage in public masturbation or fornication in order to overcome subservience to public opinion, and a Jew might enforce conjugal sex as a duty, a Christian might eschew such behavior, even the very thought of it, by means of castration. Yet, during the same periods and in the same places, some pagans, such as certain professed “Pythagoreans”, endorsed continence; some Jews, such as the more observant Essenes, did likewise; and some Christians, such as some of the “Gnostics”, engaged in shameless Edenic eroticism. While such extremes are mentioned, the author's focus, apparently based on the evidences of mainstream values and practices, is on the “voluntary abstention for religious reasons from food and drink, sleep, wealth, or sexual activity”--in other words, on what became common forms of asceticism under the Christian hegemony developed towards the end of the period under consideration. Indeed, this, the late antique development of Christian asceticism, its roots and expressions, is the focus of his study.
Despite the emphasis on Christianity which occupies two-thirds of the text, Finn does do some justice to the complexity of the ancient Mediterranean world. For him there is no normative Christianity, nor Judaism, nor paganism. Each was complex. Each, often along multiple streams, shifted course, merging and dividing. Each interacted, both internally with its variants, and externally with the others, these interactions taking various forms in different places and at different times. Thus Philo, Clement or Origen could be at once influenced by pagan philosophy and by their own ostensible religious confessions; thus Augustine could migrate through the worlds of Neoplatonism and Manichaeism to end as a North African bishop of a, regionally considered, minority Christian sect.
Our view of antique asceticism is, of course, restricted by our sources. First, the very ability to read and write, to have access both to literature and to literary audiences, tends already towards a distorting cosmopolitanism. We don't know much directly, and certainly not objectively by any modern standards, of actual popular practices and beliefs. Second, the filters of language, of cultural prejudice, and of political history have favored some testimonies, some texts, over others. Barring the rare archaeological find, for instance, what we know about “Gnosticism” was, until recently, almost exclusively through its most interested opponents. Third, given the constraints of the author's own expertise and avowedly limited purposes, very little attention is paid to the contributions made from outside the Graeco-Roman world.
The limitation of sources result also in the limitations of this study. Finn's is a literary approach, his book filled with textual references and notes. He is weak on pertinent archaeological, geographical and environmental evidences; pays scant attention to psychology, no attention to ethnobotany; and avoids most inferences which may be intelligently made about relevant sociological and economic factors in those areas of the ancient world he discusses.
All of this notwithstanding, Asceticism in the Graeco-Roman World will serve as an introduction to the topic accessible to advanced undergraduate religion majors and seminarians.