Recommended to me by my wife. As a father of four daughters, I figured it would probably be a good idea and take her advice and read it. The first several chapters on female brain development and biochemistry were particularly eye opening. It is amazing how in just about every conceivable way, male and female brains develop and process information differently. Despite rigorous science backing up the findings he presents, I expect much of what he writes will be considered highly controversial because it touches directly on the American cultural flash point of sex differences and gender roles and contradicts the popular narrative that these differences are the exclusive result of social or environmental factors.
Controversy aside, I read this to better understand my daughters’ development and hopefully make better-informed decisions as a parent. The book offers several useful recommendations for fathers at each stage of a girl’s development. Many of them seem to me like common sense (though that seems to grow less common with each passing year as fewer and fewer parents act like parents). However, some of his recommendations seem counter-intuitive even for the best parents (for example your daughter needs closer parental attachment, not more space, as she navigates the changes her hormones, brain and body undergo during puberty).
In addition to the science-heavy intro, the latter half of the book focuses more on parenting philosophy and practice. Based on his study of over 30 cultures, he argues that a “three family system” has proven the best way to raise well-adjusted and healthy children (nuclear family, extended family, and a third family such as a church or other community where they have close bonds). He also proposes a “womanist” philosophy that takes the freedoms won by feminism, but that doesn’t sacrifice a woman’s nature (her biological need to be a mother). Essentially, that a woman should follow nature and be a mother during that season of her life before committing to career. While I can appreciate what he is trying to do here, I’m not quite sure he successfully threads the needle. Any decision to have and rear children inevitably comes with some trade-offs, either on the parenting side or in a woman’s ability to advance in the workplace. Womanism sounds like a good idea in the abstract, I’m just not sure it is a philosophy that either feminists or those who are more socially conservative will see as much of a middle ground.
Overall, a really great book. If you want to understand women better (be they wife, daughter, or someone else entirely) this book is a great resource. Highly recommended. 4 stars.
What follows are my notes on the book:
The author’s approach to parenting is based on nature (neurobiology and biochemistry), not ideology (xix). The dominant ideology of the past 70 years, feminism, has put forward a number of theories: 1) girls are the way they are because of socialization; nature plays a smaller role, 2) women do best when independent of men, 3) girls are victims of male-dominant society, 4) gender stereotypes leave girls powerless. The author goes out of his way to extol the gains made by feminism, but caveats that it is incomplete. Despite all these gains, in poll after poll, women today report they are not as happy as their mothers or grandmothers, with the number one reported reason being lack of stable relationships. Men and women need to form intimate, long-lasting, and symbiotic relationships in order to feel safe and personally satisfied. He argues that childless couples can experiment with serial dating, divorce, and social independence without structurally harming a society (read Cheap Sex by Regnerus to see why this is also false), but that couples without strong bonds have a higher likelihood of raising troubled children (7-17).
While stereotypes (glamour magazines, etc) can be harmful, they are not the primary cause of developmental issues. The primary issue is our early-adolescent girls do not get enough attachment, bonding, and information from family. For many (most?), during their 3-5 year transition into womanhood, they feel abandoned. For hormonal, neurological, and psychological reasons, girls in this age group are desperate for love. As they navigate puberty, they do so among fading attachments (both parents working, parents divorce, etc) (20).
Despite the social experiment (from 1965-present) of saying the sexes are the same, there are huge neurological, psychological, biochemical, and physiological differences that feminism simply does account for.
The brain is divided into the cerebral cortex (decision making, language, imagination), limbic system (emotion, sensory, and body cycles: temperature, sleep, menstrual), and brain stem (basic life functions and fight/flight response).
The female brain develops in 4 distinct stages: Child (birth-5), Girl (6-10), Adolescent (11-15), Young Woman (16-20 years old). During the child stage, female brains develop faster, which is why they use more words and speak earlier than boys. The female brain secretes more serotonin leading to more impulse control (i.e. girls generally calmer than boys). It also secretes more oxytocin, which triggers play with “care objects” like dolls. Females have accelerated development of occipital lobe for processing sensory data while the male brain is right-hemisphere dominant i.e. less sensory and more spatial oriented (throwing, jumping, walking, etc). In the Girl stage, the hippocampus is larger than a boy’s, leading to more neuron transmissions, fostering a drive to connect with more people emotionally and intellectually. The Adolescent stage is equivalent to a “neurological traumatic crisis.” Her brain is growing as fast as during infancy, fostering new abilities to process abstract ideas , argue, etc, but also produces numerous crashes that we equate to drops in self-esteem (this is normal part of her development). Things she does during this period (12-14), tend to stick with her and she will not be good at things she didn’t practice then. As her brain develops rapidly, she needs increased attachment from parents, teachers, coaches, etc. If she has a stable family life and strong attachments during this stage, she will be stronger, more competent, and less neurotic by age 25. Stage 3 girls’ PET scans show more activity than male brains. Male brains are single task oriented while girls take in multiple factors before making decisions. This tends to lead girls to be malleable, relying on others to make decisions for her (being talked into sex for example). Today’s culture of overstimulation and technology are re-wiring their brains such that they have increased stress without corresponding family safety. Divorce and other issues during stage 3 cause the female brain to release more cortisol, making girls more prone to depression and other disorders than boys. By stage 4 (age 17), the corpus callosum is 25% larger than boys (greater cross-talk between brain hemispheres, better multitasking), frontal lobes are more active (better speakers/writers), occipital lobe is more developed (better at reading emotions and expressions), more data flows thru parietal lobes (more tactile than boys (playing with hair, etc), stronger connections in temporal lobe (better memory and listening), the thalamus processes more (emotional) data than boys, more neurotransmission in her cerebral cortex (more going on in multiple parts of her brain than a boys), prefrontal cortex developed before males (more mature morally, more empathetic) (26-52).
Female brain has 15% more blood flow, and in more areas, meaning it is broadly more active than male brains, even at rest (much harder for a woman to “turn her brain off” than men). Because of this greater flow, the female brain is, by its genetic structure, less prone to attention (ADD, ADHD) problems (56). The Cingulate Gyrus is a group of cells in the female limbic system linked to female (specifically maternal) bonding. The Gyrus carries oxytocin receptors that foster this drive for intimacy (hearing a baby cry raises her oxytocin level). Males have no equivalent hormonal response in their brain (60).
During puberty, numerous hormones take primary control over her emotional, psychological, and mental transformation for several years. Estrogen controls neurotransmitters in charge of mood, thought process, perception, memory, motivation, intimacy, appetite, and sex drive. Progesterone is the opposing hormone that tamps down estrogen to enable reproduction. Females have 20x less testosterone than men. Higher testosterone in both men and women = less depression, more aggression, more libido. These hormones (plus several others in smaller doses) fluctuate during her monthly cycle. During 1st half, estrogen and endorphin levels are high meaning stable and upbeat mood. Mid-cycle, estrogen shoots up, then drops suddenly leading to withdrawal and causing mood swing, anxiety, etc. During ovulation, estrogen rises again along with progesterone attaching to brain receptors, leading to mood stabilization and feeling of wellness. In the final stage, estrogen, progesterone, and endorphins drop (he equates it to trauma) leading to anger, hypersensitivity, irritability, sadness, etc (78-84).
Female biochemistry drives intimacy as the highest personal imperative (unlike feminist theory which elevates traditionally male measures of success (work)). When we compare female to male hormones, they run on different cycles. For men, testosterone (sex and aggression) peak diurnally (daily), not monthly. The abundance of this hormone spikes competitive, not intimate or conciliatory behavior. Males can remain independent/stoic for months on end because they do not have a monthly cycle of hormones drawing them back to the intimacy imperative (91).
In his practice, the author observed in over 30 cultures how well-adjusted children were raised. He advocates for a “three family system”: nuclear family, extended family, and a third family (institutions) like church, neighborhoods (like they used to be), etc (children must have family-like attachments to people in the third family) (94).
He argues for a middle ground between feminism (career first) and the view that women must stay home. Nothing is more important than mothering; once girls know this, it relieves a great deal of psychological confusion. Workplace activity is valuable but secondary. Infant attachment to primary caregiver is one of the primary indicators of later success in life (and absence of eating or cutting disorders) (111). In large day care centers, children rarely bond with stranger charged with caring for them.
Half of all girls are raised without fathers. Without a father bond, girls are more likely to: be sexually abused, experience violence, divorce, get lower grades, display emotional/behavioral problems, live in poverty, work low-paying jobs, have children while still children themselves, commit suicide, do drugs, run away, and end up in jail (160). Fathers should complement all aspects, not just one (like beauty). Girls who enjoy relationships with a father during adolescence, have more self-confidence and achieve more in school. Unfortunately, early adolescence is exactly when most fathers step back.
Focusing on self-esteem directly is ineffective. Four issues drive female self-esteem: 1) helping girls find meaning in their emotional biology; 2) helping girls understand the 3-family system; 3) helping girls take personal responsibility for their emotional life; 4) helping girls focus their emotional development on issues of character, morality, and spirituality (195). In therapy sessions with girls, the best improvement came with improvement in family bonds (family rituals, family time, game nights, camping trips, meals together, family vacations, daddy-daughter dates, etc).
Divorce is 1 of 2 most common reasons for teen professional therapy (the other is abuse). Teen girls will face prolonged emotional crisis during adolescence if you divorce. This can be eased if parents discover emotional equilibrium and do not remain enemies with their ex (223).
These days modesty is not considered a virtue. Today, girls feel driven to do whatever it takes to get the affection of someone who is attaching to them (“if you loved me you’d give me a blowjob”). When girls give up modesty, they risk the loss of self in their “heroine’s journey”. Girls need us to talk to them about sex myths such as “guys will love you if you have sex with them”. Women know intuitively from their biology that female sexuality is a crucial part of female character building and sexual decisions are important (270).