Upon her awareness of “Christian fatigue syndrome” (9) overtaking her life, Ruth Haley Barton began searching for more balance in her life, especially her spiritual life. She recounts the anxiety felt over internal and external expectations of who she should be and what she should do as a Christian. The added stress of the intense busyness of her life (doing some very good things) nearly crippled her spiritually and she intuitively felt there must be a better way to go about living the Christian life. Her desire for a different way intensified from a sense of emptiness in her spiritual life, especially when considering Jesus’ promise that He came to give full life to His followers (cf., John 10.10, 15.11). Barton considered much of her Christian journey to that point a façade – going through the motions, doing and saying all the right things, but without the supposed (and promised) rewards. This book is a distillation of what she discovered as the remedy for her spiritual brokenness.
In the book Barton describes eight spiritual practices, or disciplines, that revolutionized and revitalized her spiritually and seeks to help the reader better understand each practice and to encourage implementation in the reader’s own spiritual life. Each chapter is well organized and follows a similar pattern. She begins with a description of the spiritual, physical and/or emotional issue(s) that result from a lack of exercising the particular discipline featured in the chapter. She then provides personal examples and anecdotes to help the reader understand the practical implications of a life void of the particular discipline. Barton’s transparency and authenticity in sharing her personal struggle(s) is a real strength of the book. Finally, each chapter ends with a section labeled “Practice” with practical instructions on how to develop the discipline and implement it into the reader’s own experience. The value of this section is that the suggestions and recommendations are measured and reasonable without the need for additional instruction or reading on the matter.
While there are many good suggestions for Christians, e.g., reading Scripture more slowly for transformation not just information, seeking solitude for communion with God, fasting from technology and recovering the biblical principle of “Sabbath”, I disagree with most of Barton’s conclusions and suggestions for practice. Phrases like “opening up”, “touching the soul” and “consciously aware of God’s presence with you” pepper the book leaving the reader to wonder if this is a book about orthodox Christian practices or some syncretistic New Age, Eastern mysticism, heterodoxical amalgam. Barton seems to recognize the boundary with which she is flirting when describing ‘breathing prayers’ because she attempts a defense of why that particular type of prayer is not “magical or mystical” nor is it the “same thing as mantra of Eastern meditation practice” (71). However, her apology does little to change the perspective and further underscores the concern when she describes ‘breathing prayer’ as something that “arises from deep within our being” and that they are “to the spiritual life what oxygen and the pulmonary system are to life in the body, a way for us to breathe rhythmically and reflexively with the Spirit—the very breath of God” and that we do not “think our way into [our] breath prayer; [we] discover it by listening to [our] deepest longings and desires” (71). If it walks like a duck and talks like a duck, it is probably shod through with Eastern transcendental principles.
Another weakness of the book is Barton’s penchant for emotionally embellishing (almost reading in to) the text of Scripture. For example, in retelling the account of Bartimaeus from Mark 10 (cf., Matt 20; Luke 18) she speculates that when “Bartimaeus heard that Jesus was passing by . . . he had a sense of new spiritual possibility” (23) . . . or he had a sense of new physical possibility, i.e., he knew Jesus could physically heal and restore sight. The latter is plainer in the text. She goes on to say that the “honesty, the desperation, the humanness of the cry was completely arresting” and that Jesus had no choice than to stop and seek out the one brave enough to release such a “soul cry” (23-4). I understand that what the author wants to communicate is what Augustine communicated much more succinctly 16 centuries earlier in his Confessions when he famously uttered, “You have made us for yourself, and our hearts are restless, until they find rest in you” (Book 1, 1.9). Give me Augustine – for the win!
In the end, I would not personally recommend this book to anyone seeking guidance in spiritual formation or spiritual disciplines. I think the author does a fine job identifying a far too common ailment of contemporary Christians, i.e., the “Christian Fatigue Syndrome”, but her offer of a remedy is impotent. There are far better options available today and to spend valuable time in this resource may only serve to muddy what could otherwise be crystal clear waters. Any value the book may contain is negated by its syncretistic tendencies in practice and the hyperbolic conjecture and poetic license of the author in dealing with Scripture.