Two things instigate me to read this book: 1. I had little knowledge on the South America, a huge continent whose history is little known and whose influence on the international arena like a bantam player amounts to almost nothing; 2. Unlike its counterpart in North America, the independence of South America didn’t produce a strong nation, but a score of nations fighting each other and dividing from within for years. Robert Harvey, using his detailed, inviting, carefully selected materials, depicts some vivid figures, such as Miranda, Bolivar, San Martin, Pedro, etc. On top of that, some sophisticated military tactics, exotic personal scenarios and spectacular war scenes are well written. From different sources the author provides, readers can dig deeply into the “Liberators’” blueprint in establishing independent countries and their thoughts on society, freedom, democracy…The South American colonies, influenced by the example of North America and what was rumbling in Europe, produced their own key actors as did in North America: Bolivar, San Martin are the Washington and Jefferson in the southern part. However, they were more like liberators than nation-builders. In a word, they were soldiers. Bolivar, for one, liberated Venezuela, Columbia, Ecuador almost on his own. He seemed tireless in moving from one country to another. To fight is what they were good at, but to build was what they were not. When we speak Junta, we almost at once think of those Spanish-speaking “Banana Republics” and South American. This is the tradition they left: when no agreement is reached, military actions are to be used and the Constitution is only paid lip service to. But those South American founding fathers were not dictators at all, although people sometimes bestowed this title to them. They upheld independence, equality, revocation of slavery, which were no less prominent than were their northern counterparts. However, they could not conciliate themselves with aristocrats who on one hand wanted independence, but on the other hand clung so much to the slavery system that they can’t wean themselves from it and refused to give freedom to their slaves and to treat the Indians as their equals. In essence, the liberators were facing two devils: the remote Spanish monarch and the entrenched “caste” at hand. They defeated the first one but they gave in the second. Their northern neighbors knew better. They left the slavery issue intact and found a solid common ground to oust the agents of British royal family first. Of course, the unpaid cost has to be paid and the not-yet-shed-blood must be shed. But in 1860, 70 years after independence, the social fabric of the US was strong enough to withhold a civil war while in 1810-1830s when the South America independent movements were in the thick of fighting, no such a common ground had been found and as such the blood-letting lingered on, long after the Spanish monarchs set loose their grip. The prospect of building a “United States of South America” was out of reach. One evident loophole of this book is the wanting of narration on the other side of the story: What was the international situation Spain was faced? What was Napoleon’s France role in the independent movements? How did the Spanish court interreact with its colonies? Without answering these questions, this book is only half written.