Sestets is the nineteenth book from one of the country's most acclaimed poets, a masterpiece of formal rigor and a profound meditation on nature and mortality. It is yet another virtuosic showcase for Charles Wright's acclaimed descriptive powers, and also an inquiry into the nature of description itself, both seductive and dangerous: "a virtual world/ Unfit for the virtuous." Like his previous books, Sestets is seeded with the lyrics of old love songs and spirituals, and "there is always room to connect his highly polished poems to the world where most of us lead mundane lives" ( Miami Herald ). Soaring and earthy, lyrical and direct, Charles Wright is an American treasure, and his search for a truth that transcends change and death settles finally on the beauties of nature and language: "Time is a graceless enemy, but purls as it comes and goes."
Charles Wright is an American poet. He shared the National Book Award in 1983 for Country Music: Selected Early Poems and won the Pulitzer Prize in 1998 for Black Zodiac.
From 2014 to 2015, he served as the 20th Poet Laureate of the United States. Charles Wright is often ranked as one of the best American poets of his generation. He attended Davidson College and the Iowa Writers’ Workshop; he also served four years in the U.S. Army, and it was while stationed in Italy that Wright began to read and write poetry. He is the author of over 20 books of poetry.
Charles Wright is a Chancellor of The Academy of American Poets and the Souder Family Professor of English at the University of Virginia in Charlottesville. His many collections of poetry and numerous awards—including the Pulitzer Prize, the Griffin International Poetry Prize, and a Ruth Lilly Poetry Prize—have proven that he is, as Jay Parini once said, “among the best poets” of his generation. Yet Wright remains stoic about such achievements: it is not the poet, but the poems, as he concluded to Genoways. “One wants one’s work to be paid attention to, but I hate personal attention. I just want everyone to read the poems. I want my poetry to get all the attention in the world, but I want to be the anonymous author.”
I very much enjoyed these poems, also because they were all of six lines, but mostly because Charles Wright wrote them. I don’t think this collection as a whole was as stunning as some of his other books, but it was still excellent. Very gracefully written. I dogeared many pages - things I loved and things I argued with.
I also enjoyed the titles, such as “As the Train Rolls Through, I Remember an Old Poem,” which begins -
Well, here we are again, old friend, Ancient of Days, Eyeball to eyeball.
Other intriguing titles include: “Our Days are Political, but Birds are Something Else” “Time Is a Graceless Enemy, but Purls as It Comes and Goes” “Twilight of the Dogs”
I don’t think Charles Wright pulls off the glib or light-hearted very well, such as when he begins a poems with “A-wop-bob-a-loo-lop a-lop-bam-boo.” I felt a resistance, too, to his using phrases like “haul ass” and “herky-jerky.” It just didn’t seem appropriate for a poet so grave and meditative to grab at chattiness.
I also felt some of the poems didn’t have the punch intended. For example, in the poem “When the Horses Gallop Away from Us, It’s a Good Thing,” I don’t get the feeling anything is being revealed to me. No, in fact it seems kind of banal, alas:
I always find it strange - though I shouldn’t - how creatures don’t care for us the way we care for them. Horses, for instance, and chipmunks, and any bird you’d name. Empathy’s only a one-way street.
But when he’s on, he’s very on, as in the poem “Bitter Herbs to Eat, and Dipped in Honey,” which begins - We lay out our own dark end, / guilt, and the happiness of guilt.
Here’s a link to some of the poems from Blackbird. They are all in the collection except for “Down in the Mines” (at least I do not find this title). http://www.blackbird.vcu.edu/v6n2/poe...
This little book was my introduction to Charles Wright. I'll almost certainly be reading more of his work. I understand his poetry can sometimes be journal-like with multiple themes. The compact gems of Sestets aren't at all like that. These 6-line poems have a Zen feel to them, but their modest look on the page is deceptive. The page's emptiness seems to emphasize vacancies while at the same time the words insist there's a balance between what is and what isn't so that a change here affects the fact of there. A vacancy creates a fullness somewhere else, like in the reader's mind, as if energy is being transformed, as if at the entrance to the mind thought can be both pecan-sized and horizon-sized. One poem is called a meditation. Reading that it occurred to me that's what these sestets are, meditations on nature, the nature of our place on earth and in the larger nature outside our world. They're as beautiful as haiku and they illuminate in the same way. This is a brilliant little book. Each of these gems has only 6 carefully fashioned facets, but their glint is lustrous.
These 6-line poems are exquisite in phrasing and imagery, almost too beautiful to talk about. Each of these 69 sestets (notice the repetition and upside-down repetition of "6") is a marvel of poise: sound and silence; text and white space; the pain of longing and the peace of acceptance; the here and the not-here. And they are poised also between the sestet and the missing companion of the sonnet's sestet, the octave. That is, many of the 6 poetic lines are stepped-down into 8 or 9 typographical lines. A superb book by a superb poet.
Bought and read this today. The labor behind these poems is clearly expressed, and Wright's explanations for the universe are beautiful and accurate as always.
published in The Brooklyn Rail: Charles Wright, Sestets (Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, 2009)
These are poems of dusk, not aubades or paeans to the noonday sun. They are adieus feeling their way past the “blank page of sundown sky.” At 70, Charles Wright is among our most august poets. His poetry comes “as close as we can come / To divinity, the language that circles the earth / and which we can never speak.”
Descriptions of his beloved Southland set the stage for sage, six-line meditations. Using verbal luminescence, Wright limns his companions: grass, clouds, tamarack, kingfishers, the graduating light moving from “gold to bronze to charcoal.” The author invites us to imagine eternity from the “cyclotron eyes” of a “Great blue on a dead limb.”
Wright’s voice, green glass, chimes with echoes of the Bible, Classicism, songs, and silence. His words put a “bell jar over our ills” so we can hear the “unknown music” of trees. A persistently keen search for “a footbridge or boat over Lethe” is sought throughout. Preparing for Charon to ferry him to the underworld, Wright places himself “With Horace, Sitting on the Platform, Waiting for the Robert E. Lee.”
In “Timetable,” a cosmic blend of tight and easy reaches a surreal plateau as “similes sift through my hands. / Bone-dusted coffins drift downriver.” And “Darkness, the great enveloper, envelops nothing.”
Addressing oblivion with sublimely lyric imagery, Wright democratically submits, “everyone’s name will be inscribed on the flyleaf in the Book of Snow.” Surely oblivion listens to words this good.
This is the first Charles Wright collection I have read. All I have to say is "Wow!" As I understand it, this collections is a departure from his more standard (longer) poetry, but it definitely didn't lack power. I thoroughly enjoyed this collection and I think it would be a great place for any poetry fan to start if they want to check out Wright's work. Highly recommended.
The old coot's still got it. First two-thirds of SESTETS seems stronger than the finish, as if Wright slips out of consciousness with nightfall on the mountainside.
Originally assigned to me in college as a prelude to an exercise (in which, you guessed it, we had to write six-line poems), I decided to revisit this largely to see if I should keep it on my shelves.
For the first third, I wondered why I had kept it. The first poem ("Tomorrow") was striking, but I was less impressed with the abstractions. Luckily, I was committed to reading the entire collection.
There are stunning lines like, "It is the hour of transmutation" or "The older I become, the more the landscape resembles me" both followed by beautiful, natural imagery. When the poems are grounded, nature-based, that's when these poems shine.
When they try to be more irreverent (all of "Tutti Frutti," a jarring poem on Little Richard, or "What's up, grand architect of the universe?"), it falls short. A lot of the abstraction happens early on, but the later poems have clear, quiet images of wildlife, forests, water. So, keeping this on the shelf to revisit again.
The more of Charles Wright I read the more I like his work. I get a sense from it as I read his poems - evidenced of many in Sestets - that they will be worth returning to. Like glimpsing a far off light, you know something is there, you get a flash of it, and then that light grows as your journey takes you closer to it. I look forward to walking through his other tomes and eventually back to Sestets to see how close I am to that flash of light.
I admire poets who can pull off short poems, period. But a whole book of them, like with Charles Wright's SESTETS? Wow. In sixty-nine six-line poems, he demonstrates his mastery of concision, meditating on nature and the meaning of life while choosing his words with such care and playing with structure as if to give form to the grace of his language.
(YES. I just wrote this review as a sestet! *fist pump*)
File this one under "thinking about death while staring at nature," which is truly as close to universally relatable as you can get. My favorite poem was probably "When the Horses Gallop Away from Us, It's a Good Thing."
Sestets continues the spiritual journeys that Charles Wrights poetry embodies. Rich language coupled with an intense layering of insights opens the mind to connections that lead to new ways of seeing, hearing and sensing the world we temporarily inhabit.
ehhh. maybe a 2.5??? the prose might be fine but it is so hard to parse any real meaning or takeaway because of the density of the same form over and over. same reason i really struggled with "frank: sonnets". i could appreciate all of these i am sure if they were presented in a different way.
Wright is a professor at UVA. His poems are short and there is one on each page. Like many other poets he writes about nature in many poems. He also uses many Biblical and classical literature references.
What's not to like about Charles Wright--nothing. Though the six line form gets old after awhile and emphasizes, perhaps, the limiting nature of having a voice that's gone unchanged for twenty-five years no matter how beautiful it is.